View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Goldenwest Star Player
Joined: 28 Nov 2009 Posts: 2801
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Britain as part of the coalition bombs various ares of the Middle East to kingdom come. And we're surprised when these attacks happen. Maybe stopping the bombings is a good place to start. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gatekeeper Star Player
Joined: 11 Jan 2012 Posts: 5103 Location: Southland Native
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
venturalakersfan Retired Number
Joined: 14 Apr 2001 Posts: 144432 Location: The Gold Coast
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 10:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Goldenwest wrote: | Britain as part of the coalition bombs various ares of the Middle East to kingdom come. And we're surprised when these attacks happen. Maybe stopping the bombings is a good place to start. |
Doubtful _________________ RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lakersken80 Retired Number
Joined: 12 Aug 2009 Posts: 38751
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 11:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
venturalakersfan wrote: | Goldenwest wrote: | Britain as part of the coalition bombs various ares of the Middle East to kingdom come. And we're surprised when these attacks happen. Maybe stopping the bombings is a good place to start. |
Doubtful |
Especially when people have been killing each other under the guise of religion for millenniums. They won't stop until humans cease to exist. These battles have been fought under different empires and nations flags ever since the dawn of mankind. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rwongega Franchise Player
Joined: 20 Jul 2005 Posts: 20510 Location: UCLA -> NY
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
lakersken80 wrote: | venturalakersfan wrote: | Goldenwest wrote: | Britain as part of the coalition bombs various ares of the Middle East to kingdom come. And we're surprised when these attacks happen. Maybe stopping the bombings is a good place to start. |
Doubtful |
Especially when people have been killing each other under the guise of religion for millenniums. They won't stop until humans cease to exist. These battles have been fought under different empires and nations flags ever since the dawn of mankind. |
Yep. Stopping the bombings in fact gives the terrorists what they want. They attack us because we exist. Simple as that. _________________ http://media.giphy.com/media/zNyBPu5hEFpu/giphy.gif
http://bartsblackboard.com/files/2009/11/The-Simpsons-05x18-Burns-Heir.jpg
RIP Jonathan Tang
RIP Alex Gruenberg
Free KBCB |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rwongega Franchise Player
Joined: 20 Jul 2005 Posts: 20510 Location: UCLA -> NY
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Omar Little Moderator
Joined: 02 May 2005 Posts: 90299 Location: Formerly Known As 24
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rwongega wrote: | lakersken80 wrote: | venturalakersfan wrote: | Goldenwest wrote: | Britain as part of the coalition bombs various ares of the Middle East to kingdom come. And we're surprised when these attacks happen. Maybe stopping the bombings is a good place to start. |
Doubtful |
Especially when people have been killing each other under the guise of religion for millenniums. They won't stop until humans cease to exist. These battles have been fought under different empires and nations flags ever since the dawn of mankind. |
Yep. Stopping the bombings in fact gives the terrorists what they want. They attack us because we exist. Simple as that. |
That's simple, I will give you that... _________________ “We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” ― Elie Wiesel |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DaMuleRules Retired Number
Joined: 10 Dec 2006 Posts: 52624 Location: Making a safety stop at 15 feet.
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 5:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Omar Little wrote: | rwongega wrote: | lakersken80 wrote: | venturalakersfan wrote: | Goldenwest wrote: | Britain as part of the coalition bombs various ares of the Middle East to kingdom come. And we're surprised when these attacks happen. Maybe stopping the bombings is a good place to start. |
Doubtful |
Especially when people have been killing each other under the guise of religion for millenniums. They won't stop until humans cease to exist. These battles have been fought under different empires and nations flags ever since the dawn of mankind. |
Yep. Stopping the bombings in fact gives the terrorists what they want. They attack us because we exist. Simple as that. |
That's simple, I will give you that... |
Simple or not, he's not wrong.
If anyone thinks that a cessation of bombing is going to suddenly change anything, they are grossly mistaken. What is going on is more than half a century in development. The US and it's allies could ground every bomber and drone tonight and the sentiments that drive anti-western terrorism would not disappear, not over night nor for years.
That's not to say I support the bombings. But saying that stopping the bombings is going to stop terrorism is every bit as dismissive _________________ You thought God was an architect, now you know
He’s something like a pipe bomb ready to blow
And everything you built that’s all for show
goes up in flames
In 24 frames
Jason Isbell
Man, do those lyrics resonate right now |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Omar Little Moderator
Joined: 02 May 2005 Posts: 90299 Location: Formerly Known As 24
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 5:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DaMuleRules wrote: | Omar Little wrote: | rwongega wrote: | lakersken80 wrote: | venturalakersfan wrote: | Goldenwest wrote: | Britain as part of the coalition bombs various ares of the Middle East to kingdom come. And we're surprised when these attacks happen. Maybe stopping the bombings is a good place to start. |
Doubtful |
Especially when people have been killing each other under the guise of religion for millenniums. They won't stop until humans cease to exist. These battles have been fought under different empires and nations flags ever since the dawn of mankind. |
Yep. Stopping the bombings in fact gives the terrorists what they want. They attack us because we exist. Simple as that. |
That's simple, I will give you that... |
Simple or not, he's not wrong.
If anyone thinks that a cessation of bombing is going to suddenly change anything, they are grossly mistaken. What is going on is more than half a century in development. The US and it's allies could ground every bomber and drone tonight and the sentiments that drive anti-western terrorism would not disappear, not over night nor for years.
That's not to say I support the bombings. But saying that stopping the bombings is going to stop terrorism is every bit as dismissive |
Simply stopping bombing won't fix it, any more than us merely existing started it. _________________ “We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” ― Elie Wiesel |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ContagiousInspiration Franchise Player
Joined: 07 May 2014 Posts: 13811 Location: Boulder ;)
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Omar Little wrote: | DaMuleRules wrote: | Omar Little wrote: | rwongega wrote: | lakersken80 wrote: | venturalakersfan wrote: | Goldenwest wrote: | Britain as part of the coalition bombs various ares of the Middle East to kingdom come. And we're surprised when these attacks happen. Maybe stopping the bombings is a good place to start. |
Doubtful |
Especially when people have been killing each other under the guise of religion for millenniums. They won't stop until humans cease to exist. These battles have been fought under different empires and nations flags ever since the dawn of mankind. |
Yep. Stopping the bombings in fact gives the terrorists what they want. They attack us because we exist. Simple as that. |
That's simple, I will give you that... |
Simple or not, he's not wrong.
If anyone thinks that a cessation of bombing is going to suddenly change anything, they are grossly mistaken. What is going on is more than half a century in development. The US and it's allies could ground every bomber and drone tonight and the sentiments that drive anti-western terrorism would not disappear, not over night nor for years.
That's not to say I support the bombings. But saying that stopping the bombings is going to stop terrorism is every bit as dismissive |
Simply stopping bombing won't fix it, any more than us merely existing started it. |
Thank you for saying so much with so few words. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DaMuleRules Retired Number
Joined: 10 Dec 2006 Posts: 52624 Location: Making a safety stop at 15 feet.
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Omar Little wrote: | DaMuleRules wrote: | Omar Little wrote: | rwongega wrote: | lakersken80 wrote: | venturalakersfan wrote: | Goldenwest wrote: | Britain as part of the coalition bombs various ares of the Middle East to kingdom come. And we're surprised when these attacks happen. Maybe stopping the bombings is a good place to start. |
Doubtful |
Especially when people have been killing each other under the guise of religion for millenniums. They won't stop until humans cease to exist. These battles have been fought under different empires and nations flags ever since the dawn of mankind. |
Yep. Stopping the bombings in fact gives the terrorists what they want. They attack us because we exist. Simple as that. |
That's simple, I will give you that... |
Simple or not, he's not wrong.
If anyone thinks that a cessation of bombing is going to suddenly change anything, they are grossly mistaken. What is going on is more than half a century in development. The US and it's allies could ground every bomber and drone tonight and the sentiments that drive anti-western terrorism would not disappear, not over night nor for years.
That's not to say I support the bombings. But saying that stopping the bombings is going to stop terrorism is every bit as dismissive |
Simply stopping bombing won't fix it, any more than us merely existing started it. |
No. But imperialism that reaches back sure did. To the current generations, the distinction is minimal.
That's why we have to find new policies that go beyond simply stopping the bombers. _________________ You thought God was an architect, now you know
He’s something like a pipe bomb ready to blow
And everything you built that’s all for show
goes up in flames
In 24 frames
Jason Isbell
Man, do those lyrics resonate right now |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Omar Little Moderator
Joined: 02 May 2005 Posts: 90299 Location: Formerly Known As 24
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DaMuleRules wrote: | Omar Little wrote: | DaMuleRules wrote: | Omar Little wrote: | rwongega wrote: | lakersken80 wrote: | venturalakersfan wrote: | Goldenwest wrote: | Britain as part of the coalition bombs various ares of the Middle East to kingdom come. And we're surprised when these attacks happen. Maybe stopping the bombings is a good place to start. |
Doubtful |
Especially when people have been killing each other under the guise of religion for millenniums. They won't stop until humans cease to exist. These battles have been fought under different empires and nations flags ever since the dawn of mankind. |
Yep. Stopping the bombings in fact gives the terrorists what they want. They attack us because we exist. Simple as that. |
That's simple, I will give you that... |
Simple or not, he's not wrong.
If anyone thinks that a cessation of bombing is going to suddenly change anything, they are grossly mistaken. What is going on is more than half a century in development. The US and it's allies could ground every bomber and drone tonight and the sentiments that drive anti-western terrorism would not disappear, not over night nor for years.
That's not to say I support the bombings. But saying that stopping the bombings is going to stop terrorism is every bit as dismissive |
Simply stopping bombing won't fix it, any more than us merely existing started it. |
No. But imperialism that reaches back sure did. To the current generations, the distinction is minimal.
That's why we have to find new policies that go beyond simply stopping the bombers. |
I agree. My point above that they don't hate us simply because we exist. That's the simple idea I was getting at. _________________ “We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” ― Elie Wiesel |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Goldenwest Star Player
Joined: 28 Nov 2009 Posts: 2801
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DaMuleRules wrote: | Omar Little wrote: | rwongega wrote: | lakersken80 wrote: | venturalakersfan wrote: | Goldenwest wrote: | Britain as part of the coalition bombs various ares of the Middle East to kingdom come. And we're surprised when these attacks happen. Maybe stopping the bombings is a good place to start. |
Doubtful |
Especially when people have been killing each other under the guise of religion for millenniums. They won't stop until humans cease to exist. These battles have been fought under different empires and nations flags ever since the dawn of mankind. |
Yep. Stopping the bombings in fact gives the terrorists what they want. They attack us because we exist. Simple as that. |
That's simple, I will give you that... |
Simple or not, he's not wrong.
If anyone thinks that a cessation of bombing is going to suddenly change anything, they are grossly mistaken. What is going on is more than half a century in development. The US and it's allies could ground every bomber and drone tonight and the sentiments that drive anti-western terrorism would not disappear, not over night nor for years.
That's not to say I support the bombings. But saying that stopping the bombings is going to stop terrorism is every bit as dismissive |
Its revenge; (bleep)-for-tat. Nothing else, this is not really complicated. Where were the middle eastern terrorist bombings before we got involved in that part of the world? Exactly.
We continue to bomb Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Syria, and the terrorist acts grow in number. you would think maybe backing off on dropping bombs on towns or villages (or wedding ceremonies) in the middle east; and negotiating more might be worth a try. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ContagiousInspiration Franchise Player
Joined: 07 May 2014 Posts: 13811 Location: Boulder ;)
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DaMuleRules wrote: | Omar Little wrote: | DaMuleRules wrote: | Omar Little wrote: | rwongega wrote: | lakersken80 wrote: | venturalakersfan wrote: | Goldenwest wrote: | Britain as part of the coalition bombs various ares of the Middle East to kingdom come. And we're surprised when these attacks happen. Maybe stopping the bombings is a good place to start. |
Doubtful |
Especially when people have been killing each other under the guise of religion for millenniums. They won't stop until humans cease to exist. These battles have been fought under different empires and nations flags ever since the dawn of mankind. |
Yep. Stopping the bombings in fact gives the terrorists what they want. They attack us because we exist. Simple as that. |
That's simple, I will give you that... |
Simple or not, he's not wrong.
If anyone thinks that a cessation of bombing is going to suddenly change anything, they are grossly mistaken. What is going on is more than half a century in development. The US and it's allies could ground every bomber and drone tonight and the sentiments that drive anti-western terrorism would not disappear, not over night nor for years.
That's not to say I support the bombings. But saying that stopping the bombings is going to stop terrorism is every bit as dismissive |
Simply stopping bombing won't fix it, any more than us merely existing started it. |
No. But imperialism that reaches back sure did. To the current generations, the distinction is minimal.
That's why we have to find new policies that go beyond simply stopping the bombers. |
$1,000,000,000,000 dollars spent on communication between the cultures and healing the extremism within?
Our cultures will be here forever on this one planet for which there is no other alternate planet.
A guy I liked a lot once told me
"A man changed of his opinion against his will is of the same opinion still"
https://www.ted.com/talks/megan_phelps_roper_i_grew_up_in_the_westboro_baptist_church_here_s_why_i_left |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lakersken80 Retired Number
Joined: 12 Aug 2009 Posts: 38751
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Goldenwest wrote: | DaMuleRules wrote: | Omar Little wrote: | rwongega wrote: | lakersken80 wrote: | venturalakersfan wrote: | Goldenwest wrote: | Britain as part of the coalition bombs various ares of the Middle East to kingdom come. And we're surprised when these attacks happen. Maybe stopping the bombings is a good place to start. |
Doubtful |
Especially when people have been killing each other under the guise of religion for millenniums. They won't stop until humans cease to exist. These battles have been fought under different empires and nations flags ever since the dawn of mankind. |
Yep. Stopping the bombings in fact gives the terrorists what they want. They attack us because we exist. Simple as that. |
That's simple, I will give you that... |
Simple or not, he's not wrong.
If anyone thinks that a cessation of bombing is going to suddenly change anything, they are grossly mistaken. What is going on is more than half a century in development. The US and it's allies could ground every bomber and drone tonight and the sentiments that drive anti-western terrorism would not disappear, not over night nor for years.
That's not to say I support the bombings. But saying that stopping the bombings is going to stop terrorism is every bit as dismissive |
Its revenge; (bleep)-for-tat. Nothing else, this is not really complicated. Where were the middle eastern terrorist bombings before we got involved in that part of the world? Exactly.
We continue to bomb Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Syria, and the terrorist acts grow in number. you would think maybe backing off on dropping bombs on towns or villages (or wedding ceremonies) in the middle east; and negotiating more might be worth a try. |
Seems like you only paid attention to the last 20 years of history. Terrorism extends far beyond whatever conflicts the US has been involved in. The tactics have from decade to decade. Back then it used to be shootings, kidnappings and hijackings. And the people committing the acts have evolved with it. Heck, a lot of these people committing the acts now aren't even from those countries, they are home grown and been inspired over the internet. A lot of these guys doing the act are barely out of high school and weren't even old enough to understand the specifics of the US involvement in those countries. They just know that if they get rid of some infidels they will go to heaven and out of their miserable existence. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rwongega Franchise Player
Joined: 20 Jul 2005 Posts: 20510 Location: UCLA -> NY
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Omar Little wrote: | DaMuleRules wrote: | Omar Little wrote: | rwongega wrote: | lakersken80 wrote: | venturalakersfan wrote: | Goldenwest wrote: | Britain as part of the coalition bombs various ares of the Middle East to kingdom come. And we're surprised when these attacks happen. Maybe stopping the bombings is a good place to start. |
Doubtful |
Especially when people have been killing each other under the guise of religion for millenniums. They won't stop until humans cease to exist. These battles have been fought under different empires and nations flags ever since the dawn of mankind. |
Yep. Stopping the bombings in fact gives the terrorists what they want. They attack us because we exist. Simple as that. |
That's simple, I will give you that... |
Simple or not, he's not wrong.
If anyone thinks that a cessation of bombing is going to suddenly change anything, they are grossly mistaken. What is going on is more than half a century in development. The US and it's allies could ground every bomber and drone tonight and the sentiments that drive anti-western terrorism would not disappear, not over night nor for years.
That's not to say I support the bombings. But saying that stopping the bombings is going to stop terrorism is every bit as dismissive |
Simply stopping bombing won't fix it, any more than us merely existing started it. |
These are nutjobs who want to force their beliefs on us (see ISIS). That there are people who are different than them exists is all the rationale they have needed to commit acts of terror. It doesn't matter if they're ISIS or the KKK, violence like this occurs when people disagree with your way of life. _________________ http://media.giphy.com/media/zNyBPu5hEFpu/giphy.gif
http://bartsblackboard.com/files/2009/11/The-Simpsons-05x18-Burns-Heir.jpg
RIP Jonathan Tang
RIP Alex Gruenberg
Free KBCB |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Goldenwest Star Player
Joined: 28 Nov 2009 Posts: 2801
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lakersken80 wrote: | Goldenwest wrote: | DaMuleRules wrote: | Omar Little wrote: | rwongega wrote: | lakersken80 wrote: | venturalakersfan wrote: | Goldenwest wrote: | Britain as part of the coalition bombs various ares of the Middle East to kingdom come. And we're surprised when these attacks happen. Maybe stopping the bombings is a good place to start. |
Doubtful |
Especially when people have been killing each other under the guise of religion for millenniums. They won't stop until humans cease to exist. These battles have been fought under different empires and nations flags ever since the dawn of mankind. |
Yep. Stopping the bombings in fact gives the terrorists what they want. They attack us because we exist. Simple as that. |
That's simple, I will give you that... |
Simple or not, he's not wrong.
If anyone thinks that a cessation of bombing is going to suddenly change anything, they are grossly mistaken. What is going on is more than half a century in development. The US and it's allies could ground every bomber and drone tonight and the sentiments that drive anti-western terrorism would not disappear, not over night nor for years.
That's not to say I support the bombings. But saying that stopping the bombings is going to stop terrorism is every bit as dismissive |
Its revenge; (bleep)-for-tat. Nothing else, this is not really complicated. Where were the middle eastern terrorist bombings before we got involved in that part of the world? Exactly.
We continue to bomb Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Syria, and the terrorist acts grow in number. you would think maybe backing off on dropping bombs on towns or villages (or wedding ceremonies) in the middle east; and negotiating more might be worth a try. |
Seems like you only paid attention to the last 20 years of history. Terrorism extends far beyond whatever conflicts the US has been involved in. The tactics have from decade to decade. Back then it used to be shootings, kidnappings and hijackings. And the people committing the acts have evolved with it. Heck, a lot of these people committing the acts now aren't even from those countries, they are home grown and been inspired over the internet. A lot of these guys doing the act are barely out of high school and weren't even old enough to understand the specifics of the US involvement in those countries. They just know that if they get rid of some infidels they will go to heaven and out of their miserable existence. |
I'm gong back to after World War II, Terrorist attacks from the middles east started after we got involved there.
these young people you mentioned are lost kids who are trained and fed information by people who have a hate against the west. you tell me, where does this hate come from? they didn't start taking about the 'evil Crusaders' until we started messing with them again, by invading and bombing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lakersken80 Retired Number
Joined: 12 Aug 2009 Posts: 38751
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ever heard of the Barbary Wars?
Ever heard of the US Marines motto to the shores of Tripoli?
The conflict with the middle east goes back way before World War II. It has been a clash of differing cultures and religions.
This is why I always laugh when certain posters have a defined demarcation point that if didn't get involved in this particular conflict after WW2 everything would be fine and dandy and they would not hate us. Sorry, but a portion of the populace will always hate you because you represent elements which they see at odds with their culture and religion. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Goldenwest Star Player
Joined: 28 Nov 2009 Posts: 2801
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lakersken80 wrote: | Ever heard of the Barbary Wars?
Ever heard of the US Marines motto to the shores of Tripoli?
The conflict with the middle east goes back way before World War II. It has been a clash of differing cultures and religions.
This is why I always laugh when certain posters have a defined demarcation point that if didn't get involved in this particular conflict after WW2 everything would be fine and dandy and they would not hate us. Sorry, but a portion of the populace will always hate you because you represent elements which they see at odds with their culture and religion. |
that's about combating piracy. Did the pirates turn around and suicide-bomb Paris or New York because of the barbary wars? Sorry, but i don't buy the notion that middle eastern/islamic countries have a natural, un-instigated inclination to cause havoc and destruction on the west. Its simply revenge.
if we didn't get involved in the middles east, from over throwing Mousadeh, to Beirut, Iraq, and Syria, (among one or two other issues) we wouldn't have these problems now. If YOU, don't believe that, then maybe you have some inherent disdain for that region. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lakersken80 Retired Number
Joined: 12 Aug 2009 Posts: 38751
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It would be hard to suicide bomb people in the 1700's and 1800's considering the technology wasn't available at the time. Back then they performed kidnappings to achieve their goals.
Quote: | In March 1786, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams went to London to negotiate with Tripoli's envoy, ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman (or Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja). When they enquired "concerning the ground of the pretensions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury", the ambassador replied:
"It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise. He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy's ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once." |
My issue is that we have been in conflict with that region back way prior to World War II. Your assumption is that if we didn't get involved in that region, we wouldn't have these problems. Sorry, I don't buy into that notion. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Huey Lewis & The News Star Player
Joined: 18 Dec 2015 Posts: 5234 Location: So what's the uh...topic of discussion?
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2017 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Goldenwest wrote: | lakersken80 wrote: | Ever heard of the Barbary Wars?
Ever heard of the US Marines motto to the shores of Tripoli?
The conflict with the middle east goes back way before World War II. It has been a clash of differing cultures and religions.
This is why I always laugh when certain posters have a defined demarcation point that if didn't get involved in this particular conflict after WW2 everything would be fine and dandy and they would not hate us. Sorry, but a portion of the populace will always hate you because you represent elements which they see at odds with their culture and religion. |
that's about combating piracy. Did the pirates turn around and suicide-bomb Paris or New York because of the barbary wars? Sorry, but i don't buy the notion that middle eastern/islamic countries have a natural, un-instigated inclination to cause havoc and destruction on the west. Its simply revenge.
if we didn't get involved in the middles east, from over throwing Mousadeh, to Beirut, Iraq, and Syria, (among one or two other issues) we wouldn't have these problems now. If YOU, don't believe that, then maybe you have some inherent disdain for that region. |
But if it's simply revenge against the west then why are the majority of terrorists' murder victims Muslim middle-easterners? _________________ "All wars are civil wars, because all men are brothers."
http://forums.lakersground.net/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&u=13018 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lakersken80 Retired Number
Joined: 12 Aug 2009 Posts: 38751
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 12:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
If it was a problem with just westerners getting involved in the middle east then why do the following countries have a terrorism problem
Thailand
Philippines
India
China
Russia |
|
Back to top |
|
|
governator Franchise Player
Joined: 28 Jan 2006 Posts: 24996
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 4:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
lakersken80 wrote: | If it was a problem with just westerners getting involved in the middle east then why do the following countries have a terrorism problem
Thailand
Philippines
India
China
Russia |
Indonesia |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aeneas Hunter Retired Number
Joined: 12 Jul 2005 Posts: 31763
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
lakersken80 wrote: | It would be hard to suicide bomb people in the 1700's and 1800's considering the technology wasn't available at the time. Back then they performed kidnappings to achieve their goals.
Quote: | In March 1786, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams went to London to negotiate with Tripoli's envoy, ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman (or Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja). When they enquired "concerning the ground of the pretensions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury", the ambassador replied:
"It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise. He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy's ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once." |
My issue is that we have been in conflict with that region back way prior to World War II. Your assumption is that if we didn't get involved in that region, we wouldn't have these problems. Sorry, I don't buy into that notion. |
You're right, of course, as long as you don't take the argument to the opposite extreme. Many of our policies since WW2 (and British policies post-WW1) did a great deal to exacerbate the current situation. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jodeke Retired Number
Joined: 17 Nov 2007 Posts: 67317 Location: In a world where admitting to not knowing something is considered a great way to learn.
|
Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 11:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
I suspect maybe strict gun laws in the UK was partially responsible for the use of a car as a weapon and knives. _________________ Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.
America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|