PAUL GEORGE Thread (Scared to "Straddle the Fence" with Lakers and throws Jab at LeBron, pg. 1027)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 790, 791, 792 ... 1026, 1027, 1028  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> General Basketball Discussion Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
LandsbergerRules
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 11197
Location: The Other Perspective

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2018 4:47 pm    Post subject:

Iron Mamba wrote:
Nash Vegas wrote:
SDLakersFan wrote:
Latest news: PG has already made up his mind about staying in OKC

Supposedly he feels that team would’ve done better with a health Andre Roberson. Lmao!


http://dailythunder.com/thunder-notebook-tuesday-may-22/

Hmmmmm
Reporter from OKC News 9 @DeanBlevins


Same reporter, Dean Blevins, claiming that his sources told him Durant was “signing a 5-year deal to stay with OKC” back in summer of 2016:

https://www.thelostogle.com/2016/06/27/dean-blevins-inside-sources-say-kevin-durant-is-going-to-sign-a-five-year-deal/

Not reputable.


LOL at ol' "Nostradamus" Blevins.
_________________
"Chick lived and breathed Lakers basketball…but he was also fair and objective and called every game the way it was played."
-from Chick: His Unpublished Memoirs and the Memories of Those Who Knew Him
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
pio2u
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 26 Dec 2012
Posts: 54570

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2018 5:48 pm    Post subject:

Congrats to PG on making 3rd team All-NBA!

Quote:
Paul George, Thunder (21.9 ppg/5.7 rpg/3.3 rpg/2.04 spg): George ranked second in the NBA in three-pointers made (244) and steals average, setting career highs in both categories.


* http://www.nba.com/article/2018/05/24/2017-18-all-nba-teams-revealed-official-release

* https://twitter.com/howardbeck/status/999714697426489346?s=21
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
activeverb
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 37470

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2018 7:10 pm    Post subject:

Vanquish wrote:

3) Not actually knowing the salary cap rules inside and out. There was a post in LG sometime back, which stated that Mitch agreed to Moz/Deng because he thought there was still an amnesty provision in the current CBA. For a GM, to not know the CBA like the back of his hand, is frankly not good.


LG posts have more factual errors than a Donald Trump tweet, so be careful using them as an information source

Here's the actual story: Deng and Moz were signed in the summer before the 2016-17 season. Mitch expected that the next CBA, which wasn't finalized until December 2016, would have an amnesty provision, as the previous CBA had one. But to a lot of people's surprise, it didn't. Some people have speculated that this expectation was part of the reason he gave those two big contracts, but I don't believe Mitch himself has ever said that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
activeverb
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 37470

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2018 7:12 pm    Post subject:

Vanquish wrote:

3) Not actually knowing the salary cap rules inside and out. There was a post in LG sometime back, which stated that Mitch agreed to Moz/Deng because he thought there was still an amnesty provision in the current CBA. For a GM, to not know the CBA like the back of his hand, is frankly not good.


LG posts have more factual errors than a Donald Trump tweet, so be careful using them as an information source

Here's the actual story: Deng and Moz were signed in the summer before the 2016-17 season. Mitch expected that the next CBA, which wasn't finalized until December 2016, would have an amnesty provision, as the previous CBA had one. But to a lot of people's surprise, it didn't. Some people have speculated that this expectation was part of the reason he gave those two big contracts, but I don't believe Mitch himself has ever said that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Vanquish
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 1561
Location: London

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2018 7:16 pm    Post subject:

activeverb wrote:
Vanquish wrote:

3) Not actually knowing the salary cap rules inside and out. There was a post in LG sometime back, which stated that Mitch agreed to Moz/Deng because he thought there was still an amnesty provision in the current CBA. For a GM, to not know the CBA like the back of his hand, is frankly not good.


LG posts have more factual errors than a Donald Trump tweet, so be careful using them as an information source

Here's the actual story: Deng and Moz were signed in the summer before the 2016-17 season. Mitch expected that the next CBA, which wasn't finalized until December 2016, would have an amnesty provision, as the previous CBA had one. But to a lot of people's surprise, it didn't. Some people have speculated that this expectation was part of the reason he gave those two big contracts, but I don't believe Mitch himself has ever said that.


Cool, I take point 3 back then.

In all fairness to LG, the accuracy of news here is actually pretty good considering its a message board. Credit to all the posters, that if something is posted which is not true (like my point 3), it is usually corrected within a few pages.

That's why I find LG is sometimes better than even the professional news sources like ESPN.


Last edited by Vanquish on Thu May 24, 2018 7:18 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Travis Bickle
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 31 Jul 2001
Posts: 2895

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2018 7:16 pm    Post subject:

activeverb wrote:


...Here's the actual story: Deng and Moz were signed in the summer before the 2016-17 season. Mitch expected that the next CBA, which wasn't finalized until December 2016, would have an amnesty provision, as the previous CBA had one. But to a lot of people's surprise, it didn't. Some people have speculated that this expectation was part of the reason he gave those two big contracts, but I don't believe Mitch himself has ever said that.


That makes it even worse. You make decisions based on know facts not speculations.

I don't see any problems with Mitch/Jim missing out on big time FA. They made fair offers and those guys choose not to take it. Just don't throw money at 30+ year old role players.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
cyborgspider
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 21 Sep 2017
Posts: 930

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2018 7:18 pm    Post subject:

activeverb wrote:

Here's the actual story: Deng and Moz were signed in the summer before the 2016-17 season. Mitch expected that the next CBA, which wasn't finalized until December 2016, would have an amnesty provision, as the previous CBA had one. But to a lot of people's surprise, it didn't. Some people have speculated that this expectation was part of the reason he gave those two big contracts, but I don't believe Mitch himself has ever said that.


https://twitter.com/ericpincus/status/927724275452166144

Straight from the emplay's mouth

"Yes, Lakers expected there to be amnesty - Mitch asked me specifically why there was no amnesty in the new deal"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
activeverb
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 37470

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2018 7:21 pm    Post subject:

Travis Bickle wrote:
activeverb wrote:


...Here's the actual story: Deng and Moz were signed in the summer before the 2016-17 season. Mitch expected that the next CBA, which wasn't finalized until December 2016, would have an amnesty provision, as the previous CBA had one. But to a lot of people's surprise, it didn't. Some people have speculated that this expectation was part of the reason he gave those two big contracts, but I don't believe Mitch himself has ever said that.


That makes it even worse. You make decisions based on know facts not speculations.

I don't see any problems with Mitch/Jim missing out on big time FA. They made fair offers and those guys choose not to take it. Just don't throw money at 30+ year old role players.


Again, all we know is that Mitch expected the CBA to include an amnesty provision. We don't know if the expectation influenced his decision. That is the part that is speculation.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Vanquish
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 1561
Location: London

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2018 7:24 pm    Post subject:

Travis Bickle wrote:
activeverb wrote:


...Here's the actual story: Deng and Moz were signed in the summer before the 2016-17 season. Mitch expected that the next CBA, which wasn't finalized until December 2016, would have an amnesty provision, as the previous CBA had one. But to a lot of people's surprise, it didn't. Some people have speculated that this expectation was part of the reason he gave those two big contracts, but I don't believe Mitch himself has ever said that.


That makes it even worse. You make decisions based on know facts not speculations.

I don't see any problems with Mitch/Jim missing out on big time FA. They made fair offers and those guys choose not to take it. Just don't throw money at 30+ year old role players.


The one difference between Mitch/Jim and the current recruitment exercise is that I remember reading our entire pitch to Lemarcus Aldridge was basically we're the lakers and have 16 championships.

We didn't have an analytics guy at the time and the reports I read seem to indicate that wasn't much talk on the basketball aspects (probably because our team sucked then) if he were to join.

I expect the pitches to Lebron and PG to focus heavily on the basketball aspects, and especially on our young core. A lot of credit has to go to the current FO for drafting well so that we can make that pitch. Getting Ball, and especially Kuzma, dramatically strengthens our case.


Last edited by Vanquish on Thu May 24, 2018 7:26 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
activeverb
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 37470

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2018 7:26 pm    Post subject:

Vanquish wrote:
activeverb wrote:
Vanquish wrote:

3) Not actually knowing the salary cap rules inside and out. There was a post in LG sometime back, which stated that Mitch agreed to Moz/Deng because he thought there was still an amnesty provision in the current CBA. For a GM, to not know the CBA like the back of his hand, is frankly not good.


LG posts have more factual errors than a Donald Trump tweet, so be careful using them as an information source

Here's the actual story: Deng and Moz were signed in the summer before the 2016-17 season. Mitch expected that the next CBA, which wasn't finalized until December 2016, would have an amnesty provision, as the previous CBA had one. But to a lot of people's surprise, it didn't. Some people have speculated that this expectation was part of the reason he gave those two big contracts, but I don't believe Mitch himself has ever said that.


Cool, I take point 3 back then.

In all fairness to LG, the accuracy of news here is actually pretty good considering its a message board. Credit to all the posters, that if something is posted which is not true (like my point 3), it is usually corrected within a few pages.

That's why I find LG is sometimes better than even the professional news sources like ESPN.



I wouldn't go that far. Like any message board, this place is filled with "facts" that people mis-remember, assume or just plain make up. It's pretty common for people to overstate the facts or to misrepresent the facts in an attempt to have better support for their opinion. And that doesn't even include the people who seem genuinely confused about the difference between a fact or an opinion, or who assume that any opinion they hold is a fact because they believe it so much.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
activeverb
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 37470

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2018 7:36 pm    Post subject:

Vanquish wrote:


The one difference between Mitch/Jim and the current recruitment exercise is that I remember reading our entire pitch to Lemarcus Aldridge was basically we're the lakers and have 16 championships.

We didn't have an analytics guy at the time and the reports I read seem to indicate that wasn't much talk on the basketball aspects (probably because our team sucked then) if he were to join. .


The reality is we didn't have much to pitch beyond our legacy and branding opportunity at that point. We didn't talk about basketball, because we couldn't compete with the other suitors based on basketball talent.

According to the LA Times: The Lakers contended that their analytics pitch would have been stronger if they had a better roster last season and privately expressed envy that Houston's presentation could be bolstered by projections and on-court analysis of a team that already had James Harden and Howard.

Analytics is not magic; it's just math.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerLogic
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 27 Mar 2005
Posts: 17886

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2018 7:41 pm    Post subject:

Relying on amnesty just shows how bad those moves were.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Baron Von Humongous
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 02 Jul 2015
Posts: 32979

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2018 7:48 pm    Post subject:

LakerLogic wrote:
Relying on amnesty just shows how bad those moves were.

It seems like Mitch anticipated league owners being smarter than they were with the new CBA. It won't just be the ugly 2016 contracts, the supermax without an amnesty provision is going to cripple so many teams around the league. Chris Paul should go down as an NBPA legend for all the money he's going to help star players earn over the course of this CBA.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Judah
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2015
Posts: 4759

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2018 7:58 pm    Post subject:

LakerLogic wrote:
Relying on amnesty just shows how bad those moves were.

Right. It really doesn't make any sense. You rationalize paying not one, but two guys way above their market by telling yourself that if it doesn't pan out, you'll just amnesty one of them?
_________________
“Christ did not die to forgive sinners who go on treasuring anything above seeing and savoring God. And people who would be happy in heaven if Christ were not there, will not be there."
- John Piper
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
activeverb
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 37470

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2018 8:07 pm    Post subject:

LakerLogic wrote:
Relying on amnesty just shows how bad those moves were.


My sense is a lot of the reasons for the bad moves was the dysfunctional Jim-Jeanie relationship.

Jim made up that ridiculous timeline, and then backed away from it, but Jeanie made a big deal of keeping him to it. That put Jim in the position of throwing the dice on a stupid move, because he knew he'd still be fired if he made no deal.

The only explanation for the ridiculous contracts is the front office being put in a desperate situation where they felt they needed to do a hail mary. I sure don't mind Jim being gone, but I don't put the blame totally on him: The whole organization was screwed up from top to bottom, and Jeanie's stupid act ("I don't know what's going on") while throwing people under the bus didn't help.

All the Buss kids are a bunch of clowns.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Vanquish
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 1561
Location: London

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2018 8:31 pm    Post subject:

activeverb wrote:
Vanquish wrote:


The one difference between Mitch/Jim and the current recruitment exercise is that I remember reading our entire pitch to Lemarcus Aldridge was basically we're the lakers and have 16 championships.

We didn't have an analytics guy at the time and the reports I read seem to indicate that wasn't much talk on the basketball aspects (probably because our team sucked then) if he were to join. .


The reality is we didn't have much to pitch beyond our legacy and branding opportunity at that point. We didn't talk about basketball, because we couldn't compete with the other suitors based on basketball talent.

According to the LA Times: The Lakers contended that their analytics pitch would have been stronger if they had a better roster last season and privately expressed envy that Houston's presentation could be bolstered by projections and on-court analysis of a team that already had James Harden and Howard.

Analytics is not magic; it's just math.


Exactly, which is what we have now with Ball, Ingram, Kuzma and Hart. Also 3 of that enticing young core were drafted just last year, credit to the current FO. All of them are on cheap contracts and there's every opportunity to upgrade further with another max signing.

Even if we strike out, our pitch this summer is a lot stronger than it was in 2016. I am kind of hopeful, we'll get at least one free agent.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Vanquish
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 1561
Location: London

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2018 8:44 pm    Post subject:

activeverb wrote:
LakerLogic wrote:
Relying on amnesty just shows how bad those moves were.


My sense is a lot of the reasons for the bad moves was the dysfunctional Jim-Jeanie relationship.

Jim made up that ridiculous timeline, and then backed away from it, but Jeanie made a big deal of keeping him to it. That put Jim in the position of throwing the dice on a stupid move, because he knew he'd still be fired if he made no deal.

The only explanation for the ridiculous contracts is the front office being put in a desperate situation where they felt they needed to do a hail mary. I sure don't mind Jim being gone, but I don't put the blame totally on him: The whole organization was screwed up from top to bottom, and Jeanie's stupid act ("I don't know what's going on") while throwing people under the bus didn't help.

All the Buss kids are a bunch of clowns.


Actually, I would blame the previous regime for that one too. They have zero idea how to do PR.

As powerful as Jeanie is, she won't move against the fan base. In fact, I think she made the move she did, because she felt she had the fanbase on her side.

Look at the current regime. When our FA prospects for this summer started looking not so great, especially with cousins going down, they subtly changed the narrative from 2 max 2018 to Maxes in either 2018 or 2019. This was AFTER magic proclaimed to the entire universe that it was 2 max or bust in the summer of 2018. While, I have no sauces, I would chalk this, to Rob being a sports agent for so long. He had to know how to change the narrative in order to 'sell' his clients to nba teams.

They rewrote the narrative as the season progressed, and honestly Jim and Mitch should have done that when it became apparent that their timeline wasn't going to work. Instead, the previous regime made a panic move which ended up costing us till this day.


Last edited by Vanquish on Thu May 24, 2018 8:48 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
chantruong
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 Jun 2009
Posts: 8894
Location: SGV

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2018 8:46 pm    Post subject:

pio2u wrote:
Congrats to PG on making 3rd team All-NBA!

Quote:
Paul George, Thunder (21.9 ppg/5.7 rpg/3.3 rpg/2.04 spg): George ranked second in the NBA in three-pointers made (244) and steals average, setting career highs in both categories.


* http://www.nba.com/article/2018/05/24/2017-18-all-nba-teams-revealed-official-release

* https://twitter.com/howardbeck/status/999714697426489346?s=21


PG a top 15 player in the league? Not news to me
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
riqshaw
Rookie
Rookie


Joined: 13 Mar 2018
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2018 11:59 pm    Post subject:

https://twitter.com/joshmaniii/status/998989013678809088?s=12

Hmmm. Does CJ know something?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
trablos
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 10 May 2017
Posts: 3020

PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2018 1:27 am    Post subject:

Vanquish wrote:
activeverb wrote:
LakerLogic wrote:
Relying on amnesty just shows how bad those moves were.


My sense is a lot of the reasons for the bad moves was the dysfunctional Jim-Jeanie relationship.

Jim made up that ridiculous timeline, and then backed away from it, but Jeanie made a big deal of keeping him to it. That put Jim in the position of throwing the dice on a stupid move, because he knew he'd still be fired if he made no deal.

The only explanation for the ridiculous contracts is the front office being put in a desperate situation where they felt they needed to do a hail mary. I sure don't mind Jim being gone, but I don't put the blame totally on him: The whole organization was screwed up from top to bottom, and Jeanie's stupid act ("I don't know what's going on") while throwing people under the bus didn't help.

All the Buss kids are a bunch of clowns.


Actually, I would blame the previous regime for that one too. They have zero idea how to do PR.

As powerful as Jeanie is, she won't move against the fan base. In fact, I think she made the move she did, because she felt she had the fanbase on her side.

Look at the current regime. When our FA prospects for this summer started looking not so great, especially with cousins going down, they subtly changed the narrative from 2 max 2018 to Maxes in either 2018 or 2019. This was AFTER magic proclaimed to the entire universe that it was 2 max or bust in the summer of 2018. While, I have no sauces, I would chalk this, to Rob being a sports agent for so long. He had to know how to change the narrative in order to 'sell' his clients to nba teams.

They rewrote the narrative as the season progressed, and honestly Jim and Mitch should have done that when it became apparent that their timeline wasn't going to work. Instead, the previous regime made a panic move which ended up costing us till this day.

Honestly the FA pitch isn't what's most important to me. After 4 brutal years, we had a stench on this franchise we've never experienced. Jeannie brought in Magic to change the culture and instill a winning mentality and get rid of everyone who doesn't buy into the concept. We are now a team full of high character, hard working guys built around defense and ball movement. The direction of the team is night and day compared to the summer of MozDeng.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
babyskyhook
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 15 Jul 2009
Posts: 18492
Location: The Garden Island

PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2018 3:23 am    Post subject:

activeverb wrote:
Vanquish wrote:

3) Not actually knowing the salary cap rules inside and out. There was a post in LG sometime back, which stated that Mitch agreed to Moz/Deng because he thought there was still an amnesty provision in the current CBA. For a GM, to not know the CBA like the back of his hand, is frankly not good.


LG posts have more factual errors than a Donald Trump tweet, so be careful using them as an information source

Here's the actual story: Deng and Moz were signed in the summer before the 2016-17 season. Mitch expected that the next CBA, which wasn't finalized until December 2016, would have an amnesty provision, as the previous CBA had one. But to a lot of people's surprise, it didn't. Some people have speculated that this expectation was part of the reason he gave those two big contracts, but I don't believe Mitch himself has ever said that.


The fact that they expected the new CBA would have an amnesty clause was FO malpractice. NBA reporters with sources at the league office (like Zach Lowe) were saying a year ahead of time that there would be no amnesty clause in the new CBA because the cap was going to rise so much that there would be no need for it.

The fact that Zach Lowe (and other reporters) knew more about the upcoming CBA than one of the owners and the GM of the most profitable franchise in the league tells you everything to know about the Jim and Mitch era. It was absolutely unforgivable that they were making strategic decisions about the future of the franchise without having information that was easily obtainable.

Mitch was out of touch and behind the times, while Jim was insular and incompetent- their big picture strategy was a disaster time and time again.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
UKUGA
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 19 Feb 2008
Posts: 703
Location: 22033

PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2018 3:52 am    Post subject:

cyborgspider wrote:
activeverb wrote:

Here's the actual story: Deng and Moz were signed in the summer before the 2016-17 season. Mitch expected that the next CBA, which wasn't finalized until December 2016, would have an amnesty provision, as the previous CBA had one. But to a lot of people's surprise, it didn't. Some people have speculated that this expectation was part of the reason he gave those two big contracts, but I don't believe Mitch himself has ever said that.


https://twitter.com/ericpincus/status/927724275452166144

Straight from the emplay's mouth

"Yes, Lakers expected there to be amnesty - Mitch asked me specifically why there was no amnesty in the new deal"


It's dumb to give a contract that you think you may want to amnesty - especially if you don't know that there is going to be a provision in the CBA.

TBH - that is worth getting fired over.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
UKUGA
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 19 Feb 2008
Posts: 703
Location: 22033

PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2018 3:52 am    Post subject:

babyskyhook wrote:
activeverb wrote:
Vanquish wrote:

3) Not actually knowing the salary cap rules inside and out. There was a post in LG sometime back, which stated that Mitch agreed to Moz/Deng because he thought there was still an amnesty provision in the current CBA. For a GM, to not know the CBA like the back of his hand, is frankly not good.


LG posts have more factual errors than a Donald Trump tweet, so be careful using them as an information source

Here's the actual story: Deng and Moz were signed in the summer before the 2016-17 season. Mitch expected that the next CBA, which wasn't finalized until December 2016, would have an amnesty provision, as the previous CBA had one. But to a lot of people's surprise, it didn't. Some people have speculated that this expectation was part of the reason he gave those two big contracts, but I don't believe Mitch himself has ever said that.


The fact that they expected the new CBA would have an amnesty clause was FO malpractice. NBA reporters with sources at the league office (like Zach Lowe) were saying a year ahead of time that there would be no amnesty clause in the new CBA because the cap was going to rise so much that there would be no need for it.

The fact that Zach Lowe (and other reporters) knew more about the upcoming CBA than one of the owners and the GM of the most profitable franchise in the league tells you everything to know about the Jim and Mitch era. It was absolutely unforgivable that they were making strategic decisions about the future of the franchise without having information that was easily obtainable.

Mitch was out of touch and behind the times, while Jim was insular and incompetent- their big picture strategy was a disaster time and time again.


Yes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
UKUGA
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 19 Feb 2008
Posts: 703
Location: 22033

PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2018 3:54 am    Post subject:

activeverb wrote:
Vanquish wrote:


The one difference between Mitch/Jim and the current recruitment exercise is that I remember reading our entire pitch to Lemarcus Aldridge was basically we're the lakers and have 16 championships.

We didn't have an analytics guy at the time and the reports I read seem to indicate that wasn't much talk on the basketball aspects (probably because our team sucked then) if he were to join. .


The reality is we didn't have much to pitch beyond our legacy and branding opportunity at that point. We didn't talk about basketball, because we couldn't compete with the other suitors based on basketball talent.

According to the LA Times: The Lakers contended that their analytics pitch would have been stronger if they had a better roster last season and privately expressed envy that Houston's presentation could be bolstered by projections and on-court analysis of a team that already had James Harden and Howard.

Analytics is not magic; it's just math.



I thought the same thing at the time:

"Hey LMA, here's what you are going to look like playing alongside some scrubs, rookies, and other guys we just grabbed on one-year deals."

It doesn't work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
AirKobe8
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 30 Jan 2005
Posts: 8586

PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2018 4:00 am    Post subject:

UKUGA wrote:
babyskyhook wrote:
activeverb wrote:
Vanquish wrote:

3) Not actually knowing the salary cap rules inside and out. There was a post in LG sometime back, which stated that Mitch agreed to Moz/Deng because he thought there was still an amnesty provision in the current CBA. For a GM, to not know the CBA like the back of his hand, is frankly not good.


LG posts have more factual errors than a Donald Trump tweet, so be careful using them as an information source

Here's the actual story: Deng and Moz were signed in the summer before the 2016-17 season. Mitch expected that the next CBA, which wasn't finalized until December 2016, would have an amnesty provision, as the previous CBA had one. But to a lot of people's surprise, it didn't. Some people have speculated that this expectation was part of the reason he gave those two big contracts, but I don't believe Mitch himself has ever said that.


The fact that they expected the new CBA would have an amnesty clause was FO malpractice. NBA reporters with sources at the league office (like Zach Lowe) were saying a year ahead of time that there would be no amnesty clause in the new CBA because the cap was going to rise so much that there would be no need for it.

The fact that Zach Lowe (and other reporters) knew more about the upcoming CBA than one of the owners and the GM of the most profitable franchise in the league tells you everything to know about the Jim and Mitch era. It was absolutely unforgivable that they were making strategic decisions about the future of the franchise without having information that was easily obtainable.

Mitch was out of touch and behind the times, while Jim was insular and incompetent- their big picture strategy was a disaster time and time again.


Yes.


Also, it says a lot that a FO was giving out contracts planing ahead to amnesty them. WTF is that?
_________________
www.lakersbrasil.com
Fan site made by me and others, dedicated to posting Laker news and articles in portuguese.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> General Basketball Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 790, 791, 792 ... 1026, 1027, 1028  Next
Page 791 of 1028
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB