How Many Points Do the Lakers Score Per Game Next Year?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  

How Many Points Do the Lakers Score Per Game Next Year?
90 to 99.9 PPG
5%
 5%  [ 3 ]
100 to 104.9 PPG
15%
 15%  [ 9 ]
105 to 109.9 PPG
40%
 40%  [ 24 ]
110 to 114.9 PPG
30%
 30%  [ 18 ]
115 to 120 PPG
1%
 1%  [ 1 ]
I don't know... the scoreboard can't count that high
8%
 8%  [ 5 ]
Total Votes : 60

Author Message
LakerSanity
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 33474
Location: Long Beach, California

PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 5:02 pm    Post subject: How Many Points Do the Lakers Score Per Game Next Year?

So, last year, the Lakers averaged 104.6 PPG (which ranked us at 17th in the league), while 6th in pace (at 100.8 possessions per game). Golden State led the league with 115.9 PPG while 4th in pace (at 102.2 possession per game).

So, it appears that, while, yes, our pace can still be somewhat better, for our PPG to truly go up any significant amount, our offensive efficiency needs to be much improved. We were 24th in the league in offensive efficiency last season.

So, how many points do the Lakers score per game next year? Here's my thought - 108 PPG:

Lopez: 17 PPG
Randle: 17PPG
Ingram: 16PPG
Clarkson: 13PPG
KPC: 12 PPG
Ball: 11 PPG
Nance: 8PPG
Kuzma: 7PPG
Hart: 7PPG
_________________
LakersGround's Terms of Service

Twitter: @DeleteThisPost
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ringfinger
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418

PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 5:08 pm    Post subject:

I think we'll approach 110, but not confident we'll surpass it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
DangeRuss
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Posts: 1418

PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 5:10 pm    Post subject:

Lopez: 18 ppg
Randle: 18 ppg
Ingram: 17 ppg
KCP: 15 ppg
Ball: 12 ppg
Clarkson: 14 ppg
Nance: 8 ppg
Kuzma: 4 ppg
Hart: 4 ppg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ringfinger
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418

PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 5:15 pm    Post subject:

How come you guys excluded Brewer, Zubac, etc?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Don Draper
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Posts: 28464
Location: LA --> Bay Area

PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 5:17 pm    Post subject:

Lopez: 20 ppg
KCP: 18 ppg
Ball: 16 ppg
Ingram: 16 ppg
Randle: 11 ppg
Kuzma: 11 ppg
Clarkson: 9 ppg
Nance: 7 ppg
Hart: 3 ppg

111 ppg

Not as high on Randle as some, think Clarkson will regress a bit. I think the vets will benefit from Ball a lot, so I except good numbers on good efficiency from Lopez and KCP. I expect Ball to be a better scorer than most expect. I foresee Kuzma eating into Randle and Nance's minutes pretty quickly. Hart is a bit of a wildcard, could average more or average 0. Brewer/Zubac and other guys are odd men out in this rough calculation, since both look to be 3rd stringers or worse on this squad.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
DangeRuss
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Posts: 1418

PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 5:19 pm    Post subject:

Our starting lineup could be one of the more balanced in the league scoring wise. Honestly could see a scenario where 5 points seperates our leading scorer from our low score man in the starting lineup.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerSanity
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 33474
Location: Long Beach, California

PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 5:27 pm    Post subject:

ringfinger wrote:
How come you guys excluded Brewer, Zubac, etc?


My opinion is that they'll be marginalized and receive scraps, so didn't count them in my estimate. I think Ingram and Kuzma get the bulk of the minutes at the 3, with Nance or Randle getting all (or most) of the back up minutes at the 5.

I also think we are going to see some 3 guard lineups here and there with Ball/KCP/Clarkson, moving either Ingram or Kuzma to the 4, and maybe even playing Randle or Nance at the 5 in a super small ball lineup. KCP guards the 1, Clarkson guards the 2 and you have Ball guard the 3.
_________________
LakersGround's Terms of Service

Twitter: @DeleteThisPost


Last edited by LakerSanity on Mon Jul 24, 2017 5:33 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Aeneas Hunter
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 31763

PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 5:28 pm    Post subject:

That's an intriguing question. I'd expect about a two point increase, say 106.5. I'd expect a pretty big standard deviation, with some 80 point games and some 130 point games.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 5:30 pm    Post subject:

Quote:
I don't know... the scoreboard can't count that high


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ringfinger
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418

PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 5:36 pm    Post subject:

LakerSanity wrote:
ringfinger wrote:
How come you guys excluded Brewer, Zubac, etc?


My opinion is that they'll be marginalized and receive scraps, so didn't count them in my estimate. I think Ingram and Kuzma get the bulk of the minutes at the 3, with Nance or Randle getting all (or most) of the back up minutes at the 5.

I also think we are going to see some 3 guard lineups here and there with Ball/KCP/Clarkson, moving either Ingram or Kuzma to the 4, and maybe even playing Randle or Nance at the 5 in a super small ball lineup. KCP guards the 1, Clarkson guards the 2 and you have Ball guard the 3.


Ahh, ok. Then your inclusion of Hart is interesting given we still have JC and I think we will sign a veteran PG also.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerSanity
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 33474
Location: Long Beach, California

PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 5:38 pm    Post subject:

^Yea, I think he plays backup PG/SG as does Clarkson. That analysis changes if we in fact sign a back up PG that would get minutes in front of either Clarkson or Hart. But, I think Hart could also be that guy who we play in a 3 guard lineup, defending either the PG or SG spot.
_________________
LakersGround's Terms of Service

Twitter: @DeleteThisPost
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Omar Little
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 90307
Location: Formerly Known As 24

PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 5:41 pm    Post subject:

Over under should be 108-109
_________________
“We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” ― Elie Wiesel
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Practice
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 14 Apr 2015
Posts: 4551

PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 5:44 pm    Post subject:

I expect us to improve, but I'm not sure how efficient our players will be.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ringfinger
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418

PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 5:47 pm    Post subject:

LakerSanity wrote:
^Yea, I think he plays backup PG/SG as does Clarkson. That analysis changes if we in fact sign a back up PG that would get minutes in front of either Clarkson or Hart. But, I think Hart could also be that guy who we play in a 3 guard lineup, defending either the PG or SG spot.


I sure hope so. Would love to see Hart emerge as a consistent contributor.

As for the team scoring, a team run by a near prime Ball will likely be over 110. But our team next year is lacking a component needed for high scoring on a nightly basis and that is shooting.

Or best deep threat is our center.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerSanity
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 33474
Location: Long Beach, California

PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 6:27 pm    Post subject:

I think there are only four players (Randle/Ingram/Lopez/Ball) maybe five (if you include KCP because of his contract) who will be given a lot of rope and guaranteed minutes next season. Everyone else - Kuzma, Hart, Clarkson, Zubac, Brewer, Deng and Nance - will be viewed as role players, measured by the extent they can provide three things: (1) defense, (2) three point shooting and (3) intangibles. I think Hart has those in spades, which is why I think he'll get minutes.

Other players may be able to give you extra scoring/playmaking, but that's not what you'll need or want from them as role players - you will need/want those three things above from everyone else. That's why a guy like Clarkson may be on the outs. Whereas you used to want him to be a main guy, now the Lakers may just want him to be a role player. That means defense, intangibles and 3pt shooting. Thus, if he doesn't improve his 3pt shooting and defense, he may lose his minutes to Hart and whoever we bring in as the backup PG (assuming that person can give you those three elements). The same adjustment is going to have to be made for Kuzma as well, although he'll have more opportunity to fail as a rookie.
_________________
LakersGround's Terms of Service

Twitter: @DeleteThisPost
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
SGVL1
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 845

PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 6:56 pm    Post subject:

124 with LONZO averaging a rookie record 13apg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
defense
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jan 2010
Posts: 39544

PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 8:40 pm    Post subject:

3.5 new starters yet again makes it so hard to predict these things

I think Brook and KCP will lead the way scoring with the team scoring a few more points per game than last season
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerSanity
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 33474
Location: Long Beach, California

PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 9:56 pm    Post subject:

If the Lakers end up scoring above 110 per game, that will mean they'll just be crazy fun to watch. I think we'll be more efficient than last year PLUS play at a faster pace, so its possible. If we are more efficient offensively, that by itself will help our defense too.
_________________
LakersGround's Terms of Service

Twitter: @DeleteThisPost
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerDynasty6.0
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Posts: 4660

PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 10:22 pm    Post subject:

Looking forward to that compendium poll: How many points per game will the Lakers give up this year?
_________________
Starting Lakers Dynasty6.0! NOW!!
------
....." each year in Lakerland is marked by four seasons: Kobe’s Mad at His Teammates; Kobe’s Shooting Too Much; Kobe Leads the Victory Parade; Kobe Receives His Championship Ring."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
FreakofNature
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Sep 2007
Posts: 9187
Location: Maui ...

PostPosted: Mon Jul 24, 2017 11:04 pm    Post subject:

Ingram 19
Lopez: 17 ppg
KCP: 17 ppg
Ball: 15 ppg with 10 assists
Randle: 15 ppg
Kuzma: 12 ppg
Clarkson:10 ppg
Nance: 7 ppg
Hart: 3 ppg


115 per game.....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
defense
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jan 2010
Posts: 39544

PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2017 12:16 am    Post subject:

So you all think Deng will cease to exist and Zubac will get zero minutes?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Doc JC
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 02 May 2012
Posts: 3123

PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2017 12:43 am    Post subject:

Wouldn't be surprised to see Lopez, Ingram, and KCP all average over 20 per. Lonzo about 14 ppg. The wildcard is likely Randle. I just don't know how many minutes he will get with Kuzma and Nance on the roster. All warrant playing time and should really split minutes to keep them all rested in order to run the court.

110-114 is my guess. Can't imagine them not improving significantly on last season.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerSanity
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 33474
Location: Long Beach, California

PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2017 6:50 am    Post subject:

lakerdynasty5.0 wrote:
Looking forward to that compendium poll: How many points per game will the Lakers give up this year?


Already effectively made it... take a look at the lounge.
_________________
LakersGround's Terms of Service

Twitter: @DeleteThisPost
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
TooMuchMajicBuss
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 17 Sep 2008
Posts: 21080
Location: In a white room, with black curtains near the station

PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2017 7:36 am    Post subject:

Having watched Lonzo in Summer League, I'm pretty optimistic his passing will translate, given targets like KCP, Ingram, Randle in transition, or even Clarkson for that matter. I think the Lakers will be a very high scoring, high pace team, even more so than last year. I think 110 to 115 ppg is a reasonable guess, and that this team will be very fun to watch.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
defense
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jan 2010
Posts: 39544

PostPosted: Tue Jul 25, 2017 8:16 am    Post subject:

One thing to keep in mind is that summer league team had shooting from top to bottom. Our nba team is probably not going to be a good shooting team. We've got one rookie pg, one pretty good shooting center and three guys who we're below average shooters last season.it doesn't get much better when the bench comes in. Consider that our best three point shooter could turn out to be Ball.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB