Give Deng an Extension (No Seriously, Read Within)
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
emplay
Site Staff
Site Staff


Joined: 15 Apr 2001
Posts: 25548

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 2:39 pm    Post subject: Give Deng an Extension (No Seriously, Read Within)

Hey all,

To Make Room for 2 Stars, Lakers Should Give Luol Deng an Extension, Seriously (at @BleacherReport )

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2743657-to-make-room-for-2-stars-lakers-should-give-luol-deng-an-extension-seriously

Cheers,

Eric
_________________
Salary Cap Strategist and Columnist at Bleacher Report and on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/EricPincus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ocho
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 24 May 2005
Posts: 53770

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 2:46 pm    Post subject:

This is great stuff EP.
_________________
14-5-3-12
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Inspector Gadget
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 18 Apr 2016
Posts: 46613

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 2:46 pm    Post subject:

What chance do you give the Lakers at getting 2 max players.. ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ChickenStu
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 25 Apr 2015
Posts: 31904
Location: Anaheim, CA

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 2:47 pm    Post subject:

Really great article, Eric. This is really thought-provoking. I'm just curious, is this something that you became aware of recently, or have you been sitting on it?

It really does make some solid sense, if he's willing to do it. Rather than having to attach 1 or 2 first round picks to get Deng out of here, it's probably best to have the much smaller cap hit spread out over 11 years. I've been a staunch proponent of not wanting to stretch him at the $7+MM hit over 5 years, but at around $3MM, and saving the picks, I think I like this idea very much.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Eindhoven
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 14 Jul 2015
Posts: 1930
Location: Zürich

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 2:57 pm    Post subject:

That's a very good idea.
_________________
....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
TheeChosenLonzo
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 21 Oct 2017
Posts: 216

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 2:58 pm    Post subject:

11 more years at 3.3? i would just pay 2 1st round picks + Zubac and not hear Deng's name again
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ChickenStu
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 25 Apr 2015
Posts: 31904
Location: Anaheim, CA

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:02 pm    Post subject:

TheeChosenLonzo wrote:
11 more years at 3.3? i would just pay 2 1st round picks + Zubac and not hear Deng's name again


I don't agree. I didn't want the $7+MM hit, but at only $3.3MM or so, I'd rather keep the picks. I think we can accomplish what I want to accomplish with summer 2018 free agency if the cap hit is only $3.3MM of our space.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Nash Vegas
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 01 Sep 2012
Posts: 7239

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:09 pm    Post subject:

This should be unstickied to get more hits, because most posters don't read stickied threads.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
RCS926
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 05 Nov 2003
Posts: 16824

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:10 pm    Post subject:

Brilliant idea!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
TheeChosenLonzo
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 21 Oct 2017
Posts: 216

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:14 pm    Post subject:

ChickenStu wrote:
TheeChosenLonzo wrote:
11 more years at 3.3? i would just pay 2 1st round picks + Zubac and not hear Deng's name again


I don't agree. I didn't want the $7+MM hit, but at only $3.3MM or so, I'd rather keep the picks. I think we can accomplish what I want to accomplish with summer 2018 free agency if the cap hit is only $3.3MM of our space.



i guess i like to cut my losses when i know they are losses, pay the price and move.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ChickenStu
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 25 Apr 2015
Posts: 31904
Location: Anaheim, CA

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:16 pm    Post subject:

TheeChosenLonzo wrote:
ChickenStu wrote:
TheeChosenLonzo wrote:
11 more years at 3.3? i would just pay 2 1st round picks + Zubac and not hear Deng's name again


I don't agree. I didn't want the $7+MM hit, but at only $3.3MM or so, I'd rather keep the picks. I think we can accomplish what I want to accomplish with summer 2018 free agency if the cap hit is only $3.3MM of our space.



i guess i like to cut my losses when i know they are losses, pay the price and move.


I agree with the "cutting your losses" angle, but I'd rather pay a price of $3.3MM per year than $7+MM per year. And in 11 years, the salary cap might be $150MM or more, who knows. It would be such a small percentage of the cap.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
TheeChosenLonzo
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 21 Oct 2017
Posts: 216

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:18 pm    Post subject:

ChickenStu wrote:
TheeChosenLonzo wrote:
ChickenStu wrote:
TheeChosenLonzo wrote:
11 more years at 3.3? i would just pay 2 1st round picks + Zubac and not hear Deng's name again


I don't agree. I didn't want the $7+MM hit, but at only $3.3MM or so, I'd rather keep the picks. I think we can accomplish what I want to accomplish with summer 2018 free agency if the cap hit is only $3.3MM of our space.



i guess i like to cut my losses when i know they are losses, pay the price and move.


I agree with the "cutting your losses" angle, but I'd rather pay a price of $3.3MM per year than $7+MM per year. And in 11 years, the salary cap might be $150MM or more, who knows. It would be such a small percentage of the cap.


how are you paying a price of 7m + when you trade him this offseason?

the cost is going to be 2 1st rounders. but he will be on somebody's else's cap number

7M+ is when you stretch him at current price.

i am saying trade him in a package similar to D Carroll (2 1st, carroll's contract fetched 1 1st and 1 2nd)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ChickenStu
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 25 Apr 2015
Posts: 31904
Location: Anaheim, CA

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:23 pm    Post subject:

TheeChosenLonzo wrote:
ChickenStu wrote:
TheeChosenLonzo wrote:
ChickenStu wrote:
TheeChosenLonzo wrote:
11 more years at 3.3? i would just pay 2 1st round picks + Zubac and not hear Deng's name again


I don't agree. I didn't want the $7+MM hit, but at only $3.3MM or so, I'd rather keep the picks. I think we can accomplish what I want to accomplish with summer 2018 free agency if the cap hit is only $3.3MM of our space.



i guess i like to cut my losses when i know they are losses, pay the price and move.


I agree with the "cutting your losses" angle, but I'd rather pay a price of $3.3MM per year than $7+MM per year. And in 11 years, the salary cap might be $150MM or more, who knows. It would be such a small percentage of the cap.


how are you paying a price of 7m + when you trade him this offseason?

the cost is going to be 2 1st rounders. but he will be on somebody's else's cap number

7M+ is when you stretch him at current price.

i am saying trade him in a package similar to D Carroll (2 1st, carroll's contract fetched 1 1st and 1 2nd)


Yes, the $7+MM I'm referring to is if we stretch him after this season, as it stands right now, and I'm saying that a $3.3MM hit is much more palatable. As far as trading him for two 1st's, I'd rather keep the picks if the hit is only $3.3MM a year. I didn't want to take the $7+MM hit but I'm willing to take a $3.3MM hit if the cost is two 1st's. I guess there was a line, at least for me, and Pincus has found it.

I would also suspect that prospective max free agents would prefer a future where they can team up and also have the team's future draft picks all at their disposal. That could make it easier to make other trades in the not-too-distant future.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144456
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:29 pm    Post subject:

It would all depend on how much more salary we would have to guarantee
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
cyborgspider
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 21 Sep 2017
Posts: 930

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:36 pm    Post subject:

Inspector Gadget wrote:
What chance do you give the Lakers at getting 2 max players.. ?


Not the right time or place to ask that, IG. Eric's a busy man, please stay on topic.

---

This is an amazing idea and it's just AN OPTION. MAYBE the Lakers can trade him for just picks, MAYBE the Lakers can trade his contract for two or three lesser terrible contracts. Heck, maybe Deng agrees to give up a ton of salary (not that he should, just saying).

Pelinka talks about have 100 moves and countermoves, this can all be part of his Rubik's cube.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
textbook
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 27 Mar 2015
Posts: 2181

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:41 pm    Post subject:

This is pure GENIUS.


To me, this makes the most sense. It works for all parties involved. And I would not offer more guaranteed money to deng. Here's why. Deng wants out just as bad as we want him gone. Here's a way to get out and still get paid his entire contract. It's not a settled buyout technically. The downside is obviously what he can make in interest/investments over the next three years with the lump sum. But getting the minimum from another team for the next three years on top of the laker 3.1 I'm sure beats any investment he could make with that lump sum over the next three years. Thus, it's a win win for all parties. I knew there had to be some sort of loophole. I'm really interested to see this go through.


Last edited by textbook on Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:46 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Wolverine
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 21 Mar 2004
Posts: 7846
Location: San Jose, CA

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:42 pm    Post subject:

Bombshell!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ChickenStu
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 25 Apr 2015
Posts: 31904
Location: Anaheim, CA

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:48 pm    Post subject:

textbook wrote:
This is pure GENIUS.


To me, this makes the most sense. It works for all parties involved. And I would not offer more guaranteed money to deng. Here's why. Deng wants out just as bad as we want him gone. Here's a way to get out and still get paid his entire contract. It's not a settled buyout technically. The downside is obviously what can he make in interest/investments with the lump sum over the next three years. But the same can be said if he's playing from another team. Getting the minimum for another team I'm sure beats any investment he could make with that money over the next three years. Thus, it's a win win for all parties. I knew there had to be some sort of loophole. I'm really interested to see this go through.


Did you read the very bottom of his article, though? Like Larry Coon said, we probably have to offer him a modest guarantee so that it's not considered a clear circumvention of the rules. And over 11 years, that will have very little impact on the cap hit per year.

Especially in the wake of the Paul George tampering stuff, the Lakers can't afford to not add additional money and just assume that the league will look the other way. Add a small guarantee, everybody's happy, the league can't say it's illegal because he's getting more money, and that's that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
textbook
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 27 Mar 2015
Posts: 2181

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 3:55 pm    Post subject:

ChickenStu wrote:
textbook wrote:
This is pure GENIUS.


To me, this makes the most sense. It works for all parties involved. And I would not offer more guaranteed money to deng. Here's why. Deng wants out just as bad as we want him gone. Here's a way to get out and still get paid his entire contract. It's not a settled buyout technically. The downside is obviously what can he make in interest/investments with the lump sum over the next three years. But the same can be said if he's playing from another team. Getting the minimum for another team I'm sure beats any investment he could make with that money over the next three years. Thus, it's a win win for all parties. I knew there had to be some sort of loophole. I'm really interested to see this go through.


Did you read the very bottom of his article, though? Like Larry Coon said, we probably have to offer him a modest guarantee so that it's not considered a clear circumvention of the rules. And over 11 years, that will have very little impact on the cap hit per year.

Especially in the wake of the Paul George tampering stuff, the Lakers can't afford to not add additional money and just assume that the league will look the other way. Add a small guarantee, everybody's happy, the league can't say it's illegal because he's getting more money, and that's that.


Ahhhh, thanks, no I did not catch that since i was so blown away by the idea. I guess we could do that. But the whole circumvent the rules thing and tampering to me are completely different. Tampering is against the rules. This "contractual investment" is completely well within the rules. The NBA lawyers should have thought of this when drafting the contract. You can't get mad when someone finds a loophole. Further, you can't punish the lakers for following all the rules to their advantage (cough sixers for the last 5 years). All they can do is change the rule after the lakers take advantage of it. I don't see how we are circumventing the rules here? It would be an exception to the rules and very much legal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
emplay
Site Staff
Site Staff


Joined: 15 Apr 2001
Posts: 25548

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 4:03 pm    Post subject:

I've been working on this story for probably 2 weeks - not sure if I would call it "sitting on it" but doing research
_________________
Salary Cap Strategist and Columnist at Bleacher Report and on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/EricPincus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
textbook
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 27 Mar 2015
Posts: 2181

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 4:06 pm    Post subject:

emplay wrote:
I've been working on this story for probably 2 weeks - not sure if I would call it "sitting on it" but doing research


Good stuff. You will be getting a nobel peace prize if they do this and it works.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
PRLakeShow
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 07 Oct 2016
Posts: 10460

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 4:07 pm    Post subject:

OMG, Mr. Pincus you are a genius. Forward this to Maginka ASAP.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ChickenStu
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 25 Apr 2015
Posts: 31904
Location: Anaheim, CA

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 4:11 pm    Post subject:

emplay wrote:
I've been working on this story for probably 2 weeks - not sure if I would call it "sitting on it" but doing research


It's a genuinely fantastic article. BR is lucky to have you writing for them.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Eindhoven
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 14 Jul 2015
Posts: 1930
Location: Zürich

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 4:23 pm    Post subject:

textbook wrote:
emplay wrote:
I've been working on this story for probably 2 weeks - not sure if I would call it "sitting on it" but doing research


Good stuff. You will be getting a nobel peace prize if they do this and it works.


And he will help Deng pay his grandson college tuition in 2028.
_________________
....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 4:23 pm    Post subject:

Wow. Excellent work.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 1 of 7
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB