Better chance: Lakers fire Luke or the team making a big trade?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3

 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Staccatos
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 16 Jul 2002
Posts: 554

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:18 pm    Post subject:

Would trading Luke for a "big" player count as "firing" Luke? In which case, I vote for both.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
scoobs
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 19 Aug 2005
Posts: 3189

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:21 pm    Post subject:

Trade, and I dont think anybody on the roster is safe.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
2019
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 03 Dec 2014
Posts: 4586

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:30 pm    Post subject:

trade with only Kuzma, BI, and Lonzo being safe.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Hellspawn
Sixth Man
Sixth Man


Joined: 26 Nov 2008
Posts: 86

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:32 pm    Post subject:

Based on our solid defense (huge improvement), much improved ball movement/assists, solid rebounding, great transition game, and points in the paint, isn't it really just perimeter shooting and turnovers that are killing us?

Point being, seems to me like Luke has done as much as he possibly can with a group of bad shooters. Seems like even without adding stars, if Hart develops and we add two or three feisty, reliable 3&D guys (don't even really need to be stars), we would look like an entirely different team? Yes or No?

I guess I am just saying, from what I have seen, some of you guys are expecting miracles from Luke with a group of terrible shooters. (Not that Luke doesn't make mistakes... his favoritism with Nance bugs me.) I mean, if Lonzo's shooting percentages were the same as they were in college, we'd probably have 4 or 5 more wins and people would probably be saying Luke is doing great.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
socalsp3
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Jul 2016
Posts: 1665

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:57 pm    Post subject:

Hellspawn wrote:
Based on our solid defense (huge improvement), much improved ball movement/assists, solid rebounding, great transition game, and points in the paint, isn't it really just perimeter shooting and turnovers that are killing us?

Point being, seems to me like Luke has done as much as he possibly can with a group of bad shooters. Seems like even without adding stars, if Hart develops and we add two or three feisty, reliable 3&D guys (don't even really need to be stars), we would look like an entirely different team? Yes or No?

I guess I am just saying, from what I have seen, some of you guys are expecting miracles from Luke with a group of terrible shooters. (Not that Luke doesn't make mistakes... his favoritism with Nance bugs me.) I mean, if Lonzo's shooting percentages were the same as they were in college, we'd probably have 4 or 5 more wins and people would probably be saying Luke is doing great.


Luke starting Nance over Kuzma doesnt help. Having little offensive schemes doesnt help your shooters either
_________________
Set the Kuz Loose!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2010 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB