|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Staccatos
Star Player
Joined: 16 Jul 2002
Posts: 2416
|
 Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Would trading Luke for a "big" player count as "firing" Luke? In which case, I vote for both. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scoobs
Star Player
Joined: 19 Aug 2005
Posts: 4746
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Trade, and I dont think anybody on the roster is safe. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
2019
Franchise Player
Joined: 03 Dec 2014
Posts: 10804
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| trade with only Kuzma, BI, and Lonzo being safe. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hellspawn
Starting Rotation
Joined: 26 Nov 2008
Posts: 193
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Based on our solid defense (huge improvement), much improved ball movement/assists, solid rebounding, great transition game, and points in the paint, isn't it really just perimeter shooting and turnovers that are killing us?
Point being, seems to me like Luke has done as much as he possibly can with a group of bad shooters. Seems like even without adding stars, if Hart develops and we add two or three feisty, reliable 3&D guys (don't even really need to be stars), we would look like an entirely different team? Yes or No?
I guess I am just saying, from what I have seen, some of you guys are expecting miracles from Luke with a group of terrible shooters. (Not that Luke doesn't make mistakes... his favoritism with Nance bugs me.) I mean, if Lonzo's shooting percentages were the same as they were in college, we'd probably have 4 or 5 more wins and people would probably be saying Luke is doing great. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
socalsp3
Star Player
Joined: 07 Jul 2016
Posts: 3502
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hellspawn wrote: | Based on our solid defense (huge improvement), much improved ball movement/assists, solid rebounding, great transition game, and points in the paint, isn't it really just perimeter shooting and turnovers that are killing us?
Point being, seems to me like Luke has done as much as he possibly can with a group of bad shooters. Seems like even without adding stars, if Hart develops and we add two or three feisty, reliable 3&D guys (don't even really need to be stars), we would look like an entirely different team? Yes or No?
I guess I am just saying, from what I have seen, some of you guys are expecting miracles from Luke with a group of terrible shooters. (Not that Luke doesn't make mistakes... his favoritism with Nance bugs me.) I mean, if Lonzo's shooting percentages were the same as they were in college, we'd probably have 4 or 5 more wins and people would probably be saying Luke is doing great. |
Luke starting Nance over Kuzma doesnt help. Having little offensive schemes doesnt help your shooters either |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
