LAL are paying a high price for not signing Derek Fisher
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
THE_SHOES
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Apr 2001
Posts: 29556
Location: Taiwan

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:31 am    Post subject:

Sidious wrote:
Yeah D-Fish is just amazing, look at all the success he's brought to the Warriors, oh wait.. I liked the kid too he was a gritty little player but he's not worth 40 million. You guys have quite the short memory, there's a reason why Gary Payton's old ass was brought in, Fisher couldn't defend anymore.


Oh, that's clever... I guess that is why Payton was whining so hard about his playing time...
_________________
"According to ESPN.com's conference projections, the Lakers will finish 12th in the West, which prompted Bryant to tweet earlier this offseason, "12th I see.."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
gng930
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 13 Apr 2001
Posts: 11476

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:43 am    Post subject:

I think what you're missing is that the Warriors already regretted signing Fisher to that ridiculous contract 1 year later. It was widely speculated that he might be waived in order to save them from the lux tax hit.

The only way we could have kept him was to match that price and I'm sure glad we didn't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Scherm
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 12 Apr 2001
Posts: 4155

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:54 am    Post subject:

Remember Point Four Seconds!

That's how long it took every point guard in the league to blow by Dead Fish.

For $6 million a year, that would be a waste of salary cap space.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Fansince88
Sixth Man
Sixth Man


Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Posts: 48

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:54 am    Post subject:

I think they got rid of Mr. 0.04 because they thought they were going away from the Triangle since Phil left at the time, and probably felt Fish wouldn't do so well outside of the Triangle. Now with Phil back, I'm sure they wish they still had Fish. Plus, the money issue was probably a factor.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
orwell
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Apr 2001
Posts: 8203
Location: 90210

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:55 am    Post subject:

kobekillinu2nite wrote:
Let's trade Mitch!!!!!!!!!!!

To the Bobcats for a second round pick!
_________________
A proud member of LakersGround.net for over 10 years [since April 28, 2001]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
NoHarmNoFoul
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 19 Jun 2003
Posts: 1656
Location: Shanghai, China

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 10:10 am    Post subject:

Guy is not worth anything close to the $$ that GSW is paying him -- he is the past, time to focus on the future.
_________________
***************************************
"What will you all do when Mitch has rebuilt this team?

Who will you aim your irrational anger at then?"
-PopcornMachine
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Mike@LG
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 10 Apr 2001
Posts: 65135
Location: Orange County, CA

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 10:32 am    Post subject:

I knew a topic like this would pop up after he had a couple of 20 point games.

While he does have the character the Lakers need, in a sense, that was "replaced" with Turiaf's enthusiasm and heart.

Now we have Parker, who lapses at times, but also has stellar defensive games against Andre Miller and Stephon Marbury. Not bad considering it's his 1st time getting over 30 minutes per game.

You know, there's a reason why GSW signed Baron Davis. 10 game losing streak with Fisher as starting PG was enough for me. The roster, for the most part, has been exactly the same.

Biggest reason why GSW has any kind of success? Baron Davis. Even when Fisher comes off the bench, he's a SG, coming off of picks for jumpshots. Not surprising.
_________________
Resident Car Nut.

https://lakersdraft.substack.com/

I am not an economic advisor nor do I advise economic strategies or plans.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lionel The Laker
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 29 Mar 2004
Posts: 2660

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 10:37 am    Post subject:

Mitchell thought he had The Great Sasha, Marcus Banks and Chucky as his PG's.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lionballer7
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 1684

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 10:47 am    Post subject:

Pathetic...just pathetic
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Sage_10
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Dec 2005
Posts: 6668

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 11:00 am    Post subject:

I still don't regret the Lakers not signing Fish to a 6 year-36mil $ contract. The GSW sure are though.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
wolfpaclaker
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 29 May 2002
Posts: 58343

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 11:07 am    Post subject:

Quote:
Biggest reason why GSW has any kind of success? Baron Davis. Even when Fisher comes off the bench, he's a SG, coming off of picks for jumpshots. Not surprising.

They've won 2-3 games without BD and Fish starting.

There are rumors that Davis is being shopped as of deadline. And Fisher has had 7-9 assist games since becoming a starter.

Yes, Fish is more of a SG - but in certain set up situations he is excellent.

1- Lobs
2- Post entry passing

What Fish can't do is things like penetrate and kick. Play two man games as a point guard. Push the the ball. Those are things a player like Nash or Paul excel at.

But he has some very good passing skills too. Number 1 is the lob pass. Number 2 is his ability to make good post entry passes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
Sage_10
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Dec 2005
Posts: 6668

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 11:32 am    Post subject:

wolfpaclaker wrote:
Quote:
Biggest reason why GSW has any kind of success? Baron Davis. Even when Fisher comes off the bench, he's a SG, coming off of picks for jumpshots. Not surprising.

They've won 2-3 games without BD and Fish starting.

There are rumors that Davis is being shopped as of deadline. And Fisher has had 7-9 assist games since becoming a starter.

Yes, Fish is more of a SG - but in certain set up situations he is excellent.

1- Lobs
2- Post entry passing

What Fish can't do is things like penetrate and kick. Play two man games as a point guard. Push the the ball. Those are things a player like Nash or Paul excel at.

But he has some very good passing skills too. Number 1 is the lob pass. Number 2 is his ability to make good post entry passes.


Agreed. But do you think he's worth his salary right now?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
wolfpaclaker
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 29 May 2002
Posts: 58343

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 11:36 am    Post subject:

^
No
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
lakers1969
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 13 Jan 2006
Posts: 2197
Location: Temecula border of San Diego

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 11:43 am    Post subject:

8750 wrote:
we are paying a very high price for selecting vujacic when duhon was available, cook when josh howard was available, rush when tayshaun prince was available... we are paying a very high price for signing always soft players...


Thank you @#@$% kupcake.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
BigEvil
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 1755
Location: Whittier

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 11:59 am    Post subject:

You think we have cap issues now...

With what Fish was asking for, things would have been worse. People seem to forget that Smush is earning lunch money 'round here. And yet he's still doing a respectible job for someone that was a summer league invite.

Geez, over 10 points, one of the league leaders in steals...

What else do you want from the guy?

I LOVE Fish. I would have taken him over Nick the Brick any day. But Fish had his titles and wanted more security than the Lakers could give. I can't blame him for leaving and taking it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
FloppyDiskz
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 20 Aug 2002
Posts: 1581

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:07 pm    Post subject:

I miss Derek Fishers ability to blow layups. He was pretty good at that.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
THE_SHOES
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Apr 2001
Posts: 29556
Location: Taiwan

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 1:29 pm    Post subject:

Mike@LG wrote:
I knew a topic like this would pop up after he had a couple of 20 point games.

While he does have the character the Lakers need, in a sense, that was "replaced" with Turiaf's enthusiasm and heart.

Now we have Parker, who lapses at times, but also has stellar defensive games against Andre Miller and Stephon Marbury. Not bad considering it's his 1st time getting over 30 minutes per game.

You know, there's a reason why GSW signed Baron Davis. 10 game losing streak with Fisher as starting PG was enough for me. The roster, for the most part, has been exactly the same.

Biggest reason why GSW has any kind of success? Baron Davis. Even when Fisher comes off the bench, he's a SG, coming off of picks for jumpshots. Not surprising.


GS is in the basement Mike with and, without Baron Davis so it would be my guess that the problems in Golden state are and, have been more involved than who starts at the point. Davis could have stayed where he was and, things wouldn't look much different...
_________________
"According to ESPN.com's conference projections, the Lakers will finish 12th in the West, which prompted Bryant to tweet earlier this offseason, "12th I see.."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
tgf5
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 18 Jun 2005
Posts: 11581
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 1:48 pm    Post subject:

Mike@LG wrote:
I knew a topic like this would pop up after he had a couple of 20 point games.

While he does have the character the Lakers need, in a sense, that was "replaced" with Turiaf's enthusiasm and heart.

Now we have Parker, who lapses at times, but also has stellar defensive games against Andre Miller and Stephon Marbury. Not bad considering it's his 1st time getting over 30 minutes per game.

You know, there's a reason why GSW signed Baron Davis. 10 game losing streak with Fisher as starting PG was enough for me. The roster, for the most part, has been exactly the same.

Biggest reason why GSW has any kind of success? Baron Davis. Even when Fisher comes off the bench, he's a SG, coming off of picks for jumpshots. Not surprising.


Marbury is having one of his worst seasons ever. Andre Miller scored 20 in the second game against LA.

I also would have liked to have Horry still.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Mike@LG
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 10 Apr 2001
Posts: 65135
Location: Orange County, CA

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 2:01 pm    Post subject:

THE_SHOES wrote:
Mike@LG wrote:
I knew a topic like this would pop up after he had a couple of 20 point games.

While he does have the character the Lakers need, in a sense, that was "replaced" with Turiaf's enthusiasm and heart.

Now we have Parker, who lapses at times, but also has stellar defensive games against Andre Miller and Stephon Marbury. Not bad considering it's his 1st time getting over 30 minutes per game.

You know, there's a reason why GSW signed Baron Davis. 10 game losing streak with Fisher as starting PG was enough for me. The roster, for the most part, has been exactly the same.

Biggest reason why GSW has any kind of success? Baron Davis. Even when Fisher comes off the bench, he's a SG, coming off of picks for jumpshots. Not surprising.


GS is in the basement Mike with and, without Baron Davis so it would be my guess that the problems in Golden state are and, have been more involved than who starts at the point. Davis could have stayed where he was and, things wouldn't look much different...


I disagree. I still remember why Fisher was sent to the doghouse and BD was acquired, and how much success GSW late last season.

I disagree Fisher has post passing skills.

What bugs me most is, Fisher now in his prime is being compared to Parker who's just finally getting some real legit PT for a change.

Yet, Parker has shown much more this season than Fisher did in 1999.
_________________
Resident Car Nut.

https://lakersdraft.substack.com/

I am not an economic advisor nor do I advise economic strategies or plans.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
THE_SHOES
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Apr 2001
Posts: 29556
Location: Taiwan

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 2:08 pm    Post subject:

Mike@LG wrote:
THE_SHOES wrote:
Mike@LG wrote:
I knew a topic like this would pop up after he had a couple of 20 point games.

While he does have the character the Lakers need, in a sense, that was "replaced" with Turiaf's enthusiasm and heart.

Now we have Parker, who lapses at times, but also has stellar defensive games against Andre Miller and Stephon Marbury. Not bad considering it's his 1st time getting over 30 minutes per game.

You know, there's a reason why GSW signed Baron Davis. 10 game losing streak with Fisher as starting PG was enough for me. The roster, for the most part, has been exactly the same.

Biggest reason why GSW has any kind of success? Baron Davis. Even when Fisher comes off the bench, he's a SG, coming off of picks for jumpshots. Not surprising.


GS is in the basement Mike with and, without Baron Davis so it would be my guess that the problems in Golden state are and, have been more involved than who starts at the point. Davis could have stayed where he was and, things wouldn't look much different...


I disagree. I still remember why Fisher was sent to the doghouse and BD was acquired, and how much success GSW late last season.

I disagree Fisher has post passing skills.

What bugs me most is, Fisher now in his prime is being compared to Parker who's just finally getting some real legit PT for a change.

Yet, Parker has shown much more this season than Fisher did in 1999.


I like Parker and, don't have any issues with him. He'll learn and has skills galore. It isn't fair to compare the two because Fish has seen to much an been through way more. I'm not going there. I do believe that a team of Fish and, Smush would be more efficient than Smush and, Sasha just because they could both learn some valuable things from Fish. When Fish is healthy he can still be very dangerous. This young team would do nothing but benefit with Fish, Kobe and Devean running and, teaching the new kids. If Golden state waives Fisher this summer guess whose coming to dinner in LA?
_________________
"According to ESPN.com's conference projections, the Lakers will finish 12th in the West, which prompted Bryant to tweet earlier this offseason, "12th I see.."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
tgf5
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 18 Jun 2005
Posts: 11581
Location: Canada

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 2:11 pm    Post subject:

Fisher was also one of the best floppers and could hit open shots. He was my favourite player 2001 and before, especially during the Philly Finals.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venicebeach
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 30 May 2005
Posts: 165
Location: Rome, Italy

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 2:33 pm    Post subject:

Fisher is good but his contract is horrible for the Lakers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger Reply with quote
lakers0505
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 10701

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 3:50 pm    Post subject:

kobekillinu2nite wrote:
Let's trade Mitch!!!!!!!!!!!


God , my man i think u are on too something their , who would take him though....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
vakobe
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 29 Mar 2003
Posts: 1392

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:16 pm    Post subject:

Wow! I was on this board a lot when Fisher was actually a Laker and I'd estimate that the anti-Fisher comments outnumbered the pro-Fisher comments by at least 5 to 1. Now everyone wants Mitch's head for letting him go.

I was among the minority who actually liked Fisher when he was here, even before his amazing shot against the Spurs. But there is no way I would have given him the contract that he got from Golden State. It just didn't make sense, and it still doesn't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
thumpinghead
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 17 Nov 2005
Posts: 5657

PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 4:17 pm    Post subject:

wolfpaclaker wrote:
This franchise has ingnored a traditoinal PG since Kobe developped and Phil came along.

1- Phil doesn't like ball dominant PG's.
2- We signed a HOF in Payton - forgot that? - and it didn't work out
3- The chemistry issues with a traditional point and Bryant is always under suspicion
4- Phil's coach and has a huge say on who come's in or not.
5- Baron almost was a Laker last season until they felt that his back wouldn't hold up longterm (coincidentally that was when Phil wasn't coach)


1. yes, agreed upon.

2. yes, agreed upon.

3. WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? Kobe WOULD LOVE to play with an all-star PG? I dont even understand that RUMOR.

4. yes, agreed upon.

5. News to me...sources??
_________________
Kevin Love. 2015.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB