KAWHI LEONARD THREAD (Woj: KL to sign with Clippers who get Paul George)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 12, 13, 14 ... 876, 877, 878  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> General Basketball Discussion Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
splashmtn
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 30 Aug 2016
Posts: 3961

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 10:17 am    Post subject:

Inspector Gadget wrote:
Ireland bought up a good point.. if the Spurs give Leonard the super-max the Spurs will be handicapped from improving the roster, even with Leonard coming back I don’t think a super max is warranted unless you have a good chance to make the finals.
there's only 2 players in the nba right now that deserve the super max. thats lebron james and a healthy Kawhi.

both of them shouldnt get it in order to have more funds for each team they are on. but based on what they bring to the table. they are actual true max guys.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
DangeRuss
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Posts: 1418

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 12:18 pm    Post subject:

splashmtn wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Ireland bought up a good point.. if the Spurs give Leonard the super-max the Spurs will be handicapped from improving the roster, even with Leonard coming back I don’t think a super max is warranted unless you have a good chance to make the finals.
there's only 2 players in the nba right now that deserve the super max. thats lebron james and a healthy Kawhi.

both of them shouldnt get it in order to have more funds for each team they are on. but based on what they bring to the table. they are actual true max guys.


Durant, Curry, harden, Westbrook, Davis, Giannis, Kawhi, James. Those are the true max guys imo.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
defense
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jan 2010
Posts: 39400

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 12:21 pm    Post subject:

DangeRuss wrote:
splashmtn wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Ireland bought up a good point.. if the Spurs give Leonard the super-max the Spurs will be handicapped from improving the roster, even with Leonard coming back I don’t think a super max is warranted unless you have a good chance to make the finals.
there's only 2 players in the nba right now that deserve the super max. thats lebron james and a healthy Kawhi.

both of them shouldnt get it in order to have more funds for each team they are on. but based on what they bring to the table. they are actual true max guys.


Durant, Curry, harden, Westbrook, Davis, Giannis, Kawhi, James. Those are the true max guys imo.


I would give it to all those guys except Westbrook
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
999
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 20266

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 12:28 pm    Post subject:

I would give up Lonzo kuz and Ingram for Anthony Davis
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144456
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 1:15 pm    Post subject:

Inspector Gadget wrote:
Ireland bought up a good point.. if the Spurs give Leonard the super-max the Spurs will be handicapped from improving the roster, even with Leonard coming back I don’t think a super max is warranted unless you have a good chance to make the finals.


You should tell Pop, I’m sure he is waiting to hear.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
trablos
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 10 May 2017
Posts: 3020

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 1:17 pm    Post subject:

999 wrote:
I would give up Lonzo kuz and Ingram for Anthony Davis

No need, we can just watch the Pels play now
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kentu_tiro
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 30 Sep 2007
Posts: 2798

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 1:57 pm    Post subject:

trablos wrote:
SGV-Laker fan wrote:
I call this BS just like other stars had used Lakers as bargaining chip.

Like who? I've heard this argument before, but guys can use any team as leverage, why would they always use the Lakers?


Fact - PG13 was one of those who used the Lakers as leverage. Before he signed his last max extension with Indiana years ago, he was on record saying it would be nice to play alongside Kobe his idol. Next thing you know Indy went all in and offered him a max extension which PG13 immediately signed.
_________________
The road back to the top...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
trablos
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 10 May 2017
Posts: 3020

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 2:01 pm    Post subject:

kentu_tiro wrote:
trablos wrote:
SGV-Laker fan wrote:
I call this BS just like other stars had used Lakers as bargaining chip.

Like who? I've heard this argument before, but guys can use any team as leverage, why would they always use the Lakers?


Fact - PG13 was one of those who used the Lakers as leverage. Before he signed his last max extension with Indiana years ago, he was on record saying it would be nice to play alongside Kobe his idol. Next thing you know Indy went all in and offered him a max extension which PG13 immediately signed.

Yeah but he could have easily come up with some other narrative for wanting to play for any other team. So why L.A.?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
DangeRuss
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 10 Feb 2016
Posts: 1418

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 2:04 pm    Post subject:

trablos wrote:
kentu_tiro wrote:
trablos wrote:
SGV-Laker fan wrote:
I call this BS just like other stars had used Lakers as bargaining chip.

Like who? I've heard this argument before, but guys can use any team as leverage, why would they always use the Lakers?


Fact - PG13 was one of those who used the Lakers as leverage. Before he signed his last max extension with Indiana years ago, he was on record saying it would be nice to play alongside Kobe his idol. Next thing you know Indy went all in and offered him a max extension which PG13 immediately signed.

Yeah but he could have easily come up with some other narrative for wanting to play for any other team. So why L.A.?


Cmon man, you really gotta ask that question?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
textbook
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 27 Mar 2015
Posts: 2181

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 2:38 pm    Post subject:

The super max is literally 44 MILLION dollars a year.

IS any player really worth that much??? It hurts building your team. Unless the entire amount doesn't count against your cap?

I don't see it. Unless the cap goes up to 120 then maybe.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
defense
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jan 2010
Posts: 39400

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 2:40 pm    Post subject:

textbook wrote:
The super max is literally 44 MILLION dollars a year.

IS any player really worth that much??? It hurts building your team. Unless the entire amount doesn't count against your cap?

I don't see it. Unless the cap goes up to 120 then maybe.


If you want to build a championship team, paying someone 44 million is probably not the way to go
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
textbook
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 27 Mar 2015
Posts: 2181

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 2:42 pm    Post subject:

defense wrote:
textbook wrote:
The super max is literally 44 MILLION dollars a year.

IS any player really worth that much??? It hurts building your team. Unless the entire amount doesn't count against your cap?

I don't see it. Unless the cap goes up to 120 then maybe.


If you want to build a championship team, paying someone 44 million is probably not the way to go


Has any player got the super max? I think its a bad move for any team.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
999
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 20266

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 3:16 pm    Post subject:

textbook wrote:
defense wrote:
textbook wrote:
The super max is literally 44 MILLION dollars a year.

IS any player really worth that much??? It hurts building your team. Unless the entire amount doesn't count against your cap?

I don't see it. Unless the cap goes up to 120 then maybe.


If you want to build a championship team, paying someone 44 million is probably not the way to go


Has any player got the super max? I think its a bad move for any team.


steph curry
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
AFireInside619
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 11 Dec 2015
Posts: 11447

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 3:27 pm    Post subject:

Lebron James is worth a $100 m, maybe more. And if there weren't small markets arguing, he'd be playing for the Knicks or Lakers right now getting paid what he deserved. You know how much money the NBA, Clothing Companies, TNT, ESPN, YouTube (via illegal use of copyrighted video), and video game makers make off of his name world wide? And that's not saying what he does for Cleveland's economy. It went to (bleep) when he left to go to Miami. So yes, you can say no player is worth $44m, but that's far from the truth. Without a salary cap Steph and Lebron would be making more that $44m per year.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 3:30 pm    Post subject:

999 wrote:
textbook wrote:
defense wrote:
textbook wrote:
The super max is literally 44 MILLION dollars a year.

IS any player really worth that much??? It hurts building your team. Unless the entire amount doesn't count against your cap?

I don't see it. Unless the cap goes up to 120 then maybe.


If you want to build a championship team, paying someone 44 million is probably not the way to go


Has any player got the super max? I think its a bad move for any team.


steph curry


Wall, Westbrook, Curry and Harden.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
trablos
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 10 May 2017
Posts: 3020

PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2018 8:59 pm    Post subject:

AFireInside619 wrote:
Lebron James is worth a $100 m, maybe more. And if there weren't small markets arguing, he'd be playing for the Knicks or Lakers right now getting paid what he deserved. You know how much money the NBA, Clothing Companies, TNT, ESPN, YouTube (via illegal use of copyrighted video), and video game makers make off of his name world wide? And that's not saying what he does for Cleveland's economy. It went to (bleep) when he left to go to Miami. So yes, you can say no player is worth $44m, but that's far from the truth. Without a salary cap Steph and Lebron would be making more that $44m per year.

Yes but the point remains, you have damn near half your cap space tied up on ONE player. As history has taught us, no matter how great you are, nobody wins alone. So how are you supposed to build a decent supporting cast a long with another superstar you'll need to compete when you're handicapped by 50% right out of the gate?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Vanquish
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Posts: 1561
Location: London

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2018 6:13 am    Post subject:

trablos wrote:
AFireInside619 wrote:
Lebron James is worth a $100 m, maybe more. And if there weren't small markets arguing, he'd be playing for the Knicks or Lakers right now getting paid what he deserved. You know how much money the NBA, Clothing Companies, TNT, ESPN, YouTube (via illegal use of copyrighted video), and video game makers make off of his name world wide? And that's not saying what he does for Cleveland's economy. It went to (bleep) when he left to go to Miami. So yes, you can say no player is worth $44m, but that's far from the truth. Without a salary cap Steph and Lebron would be making more that $44m per year.

Yes but the point remains, you have damn near half your cap space tied up on ONE player. As history has taught us, no matter how great you are, nobody wins alone. So how are you supposed to build a decent supporting cast a long with another superstar you'll need to compete when you're handicapped by 50% right out of the gate?


Can you just imagine tying 44 m to one player and then have that player go down to a season ending injury on the first day of the season (like Hayward on a 44 m contract).

The risk alone would make it crazy for any team to give 44 m to a player. If that player goes down, you're going to be playing the rest of the season with essentially a bunch of scrubs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
governator
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 25064

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2018 6:27 am    Post subject:

Vanquish wrote:
trablos wrote:
AFireInside619 wrote:
Lebron James is worth a $100 m, maybe more. And if there weren't small markets arguing, he'd be playing for the Knicks or Lakers right now getting paid what he deserved. You know how much money the NBA, Clothing Companies, TNT, ESPN, YouTube (via illegal use of copyrighted video), and video game makers make off of his name world wide? And that's not saying what he does for Cleveland's economy. It went to (bleep) when he left to go to Miami. So yes, you can say no player is worth $44m, but that's far from the truth. Without a salary cap Steph and Lebron would be making more that $44m per year.

Yes but the point remains, you have damn near half your cap space tied up on ONE player. As history has taught us, no matter how great you are, nobody wins alone. So how are you supposed to build a decent supporting cast a long with another superstar you'll need to compete when you're handicapped by 50% right out of the gate?


Can you just imagine tying 44 m to one player and then have that player go down to a season ending injury on the first day of the season (like Hayward on a 44 m contract).

The risk alone would make it crazy for any team to give 44 m to a player. If that player goes down, you're going to be playing the rest of the season with essentially a bunch of scrubs.


There's about 29 other teams who prob would give that 'player' the supermax if that player's available... it's the market
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
joeblow
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Nov 2008
Posts: 3087

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2018 11:01 am    Post subject:

trablos wrote:
AFireInside619 wrote:
Lebron James is worth a $100 m, maybe more. And if there weren't small markets arguing, he'd be playing for the Knicks or Lakers right now getting paid what he deserved. You know how much money the NBA, Clothing Companies, TNT, ESPN, YouTube (via illegal use of copyrighted video), and video game makers make off of his name world wide? And that's not saying what he does for Cleveland's economy. It went to (bleep) when he left to go to Miami. So yes, you can say no player is worth $44m, but that's far from the truth. Without a salary cap Steph and Lebron would be making more that $44m per year.

Yes but the point remains, you have damn near half your cap space tied up on ONE player. As history has taught us, no matter how great you are, nobody wins alone. So how are you supposed to build a decent supporting cast a long with another superstar you'll need to compete when you're handicapped by 50% right out of the gate?

All four of the super max players made the playoffs. Two of them are in the conference finals. Two other guys still playing deserve it more than the current four who have it.

With a good front office, it can be made to work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2018 11:04 am    Post subject:

He didn't even make all NBA this year!
Hope his rehab goes well... unless he stays a spur?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2018 1:56 pm    Post subject:

Danny Green says KL told him that he would like to stay with the Spurs.
Fun.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
P.K.
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 10 Jul 2003
Posts: 29700

PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2018 2:37 pm    Post subject:

epak wrote:
Danny Green says KL told him that he would like to stay with the Spurs.
Fun.

https://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/kawhi-leonard-trade-rumors-spurs-teammate-danny-green-says-star-wants-to-stay-in-san-antonio/

"@DGreen_14 says Kawhi Leonard has personally told him he wants to stay with the Spurs."
_________________
LBJ + AD = More rings
Never argue with a fool - listeners can't tell you apart
Wilt's unstoppable fadeaway: www.youtube.com/watch?v=8O9MgNfcGJA
NPZ's Magic Johnson mix: www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8Qbo0WqvOI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
cyborgspider
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 21 Sep 2017
Posts: 930

PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2018 4:00 pm    Post subject:

*changes thread title to Jimmy Butler 2019 watch

**Jimmy extends, changes thread to Kris Middleton 2019 Watch

Always thought it was a looongshot for Kawhi. If the options for 2019 dry up for the Lakers (all they players they want get extended), I'd like to check out the middle tier of FA's that are worth maybe half the max and get two players or three players with that max slot.

Anyway, this will all change come July 1st
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jsthornton7
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 05 May 2018
Posts: 231

PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2018 4:06 pm    Post subject:

First Danny Green said he thinks Kawhi wants to stay. The he said he told him that verbally. Maybe he does want to stay, but maybe he wants to play for the Lakers more. We’ll find out soon.

The best move for Kawhi is to just focus on getting healthy and then figure out what he wants to do. Well know the answer when he accepts or declines a super max offer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144456
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2018 11:12 am    Post subject:

textbook wrote:
defense wrote:
textbook wrote:
The super max is literally 44 MILLION dollars a year.

IS any player really worth that much??? It hurts building your team. Unless the entire amount doesn't count against your cap?

I don't see it. Unless the cap goes up to 120 then maybe.


If you want to build a championship team, paying someone 44 million is probably not the way to go


Has any player got the super max? I think its a bad move for any team.


Has any player turned it down? CP3?
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> General Basketball Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 12, 13, 14 ... 876, 877, 878  Next
Page 13 of 878
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB