Ingram will be same level as George next year. Blessing in disguise.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
KB824MJ
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 25 Jun 2015
Posts: 1349

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 12:57 am    Post subject:

Sentient Meat wrote:
Brandon Ingram 2nd year vs. Paul George 2nd year

Ingram 16.1 PPG 5.3 RPG 3.9 APG 0.8 STL 0.7 BLK
George 12.1 PPG 5.6 RPG 2.4 APG 1.6 STL 0.6 BLK

Wow... inconceivable that BI can ever be as good as PG...

If you go by age... the difference in BI's favor is even more pronounced.
BI is actually way better than people think, to be honest. He is a late bloomer and plenty of guys explode on their 3rd-5th years. And BI has already outplayed most in their second season. You keep this kid at all costs. He could have averaged 20 points last season, just needs to hit his freethrows and he would have gotten there
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
DShotMaker1824
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 16 Feb 2012
Posts: 8769

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 1:11 am    Post subject:

I wanted both, great perimeter defense is the only way to defeat the Warriors.
Ingram, Kawhi and PG are the only ones who can provide that. We are fine on offense without a guy who can't play off ball in LeBron, and heaven and earth knows LeBron doesn't play consistent defense anymore.
_________________

"Through the legs to the left, through the legs to the right, we don't run them Laker plays, we just Kobe fadeaway..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Sentient Meat
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 04 Jul 2014
Posts: 12978

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 1:14 am    Post subject:

KB824MJ wrote:
Sentient Meat wrote:
Brandon Ingram 2nd year vs. Paul George 2nd year

Ingram 16.1 PPG 5.3 RPG 3.9 APG 0.8 STL 0.7 BLK
George 12.1 PPG 5.6 RPG 2.4 APG 1.6 STL 0.6 BLK

Wow... inconceivable that BI can ever be as good as PG...

If you go by age... the difference in BI's favor is even more pronounced.
BI is actually way better than people think, to be honest. He is a late bloomer and plenty of guys explode on their 3rd-5th years. And BI has already outplayed most in their second season. You keep this kid at all costs. He could have averaged 20 points last season, just needs to hit his freethrows and he would have gotten there


That's the one thing that PG really has him beat... FT%... but if Ingram works hard and raises his percentages... works on his defense... he will be right at his level.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Luminous8
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 Apr 2017
Posts: 2192

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 2:28 am    Post subject:

The thing for me about BI, is that he is already quite the dynamic basketball talent yet somehow manages to still be one the most raw players on the team. It's a very odd situation to be in with a player but it's true for Brandon and a huge reason why I have all the faith in the world in the kid.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kawhileonard
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 15 Jun 2018
Posts: 599

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 3:53 am    Post subject:

I doubt Ingram would do as well as PG13 if he was in OKC.

PG13 was literally the third option behind Russ and HOODY MELO. Also, PG13 didn't become the man until Danny Granger left and this dude carried the pacers against lebron's super Heat teams very well imo.

Ingram has a high ceiling, but dont make it sound like Ingram is there or anywhere near that level yet... PG13 was at a point of time, one of the best players in the NBA
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
non-player zealot
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Posts: 21365

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 3:54 am    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
George said more than no.

He said "ya'll don't even get a meeting"

Like Whiteside did to Jim and Mitch.



This may sound like sour grapes, but it's not. I'll reserve those for something a little more grandiose than Paul George. After what happened with Dwight, if a player/FA is letting the LA Lakers know that they don't wanna be here, believe them and accept it as a gift that they didn't second guess themselves and come here anyway. Not everyone is made for this market and franchise. George is content with small Midwestern franchises and if he isn't risking this market and these expectations, it's for the best long term that he stays wherever he is, at least if and until Brawn admits that PG not signing here made up his own mind not to. Until that's a given thing, we ain't gonna live or die on a decision by Paul George no matter what it is. On its face, not getting Paul George doesn't even feel as bad as coming in 2nd to Orlando for Ho Grant in 94 where he lauded the FO, but didn't think we were set to win anything. It's definitely not as embarrassing as how LMA was completely unimpressed with our pitch and our lack of analytics and entitlement based on winning history. PG didn't necessarily avoid us like the plague based on perception of the FO/mgmnt like Whiteside quite probably did with Jim/Mitch. He might just be happy to take the money and stay in OKC. He's been acclimated to that locale after starting his career in "alt-OKC" (Indianapolis).
_________________
GOAT MAGIC REEL
SEDALE TRIBUTE
EDDIE DONX!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakurluv
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 17 May 2010
Posts: 2529

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 5:10 am    Post subject:

I agree with this... If Ingram can find his focus on the court, he can be just as good as George and truth be told even better defensively!
But he's got to put on some weight/muscle...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
av3773
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 11 Dec 2011
Posts: 3751

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 5:14 am    Post subject:

Lakers are unwilling to move BI for a reason
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
novadolla
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 17 Apr 2011
Posts: 3020

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 5:38 am    Post subject:

Ingram is 20 years old. How old was PG13 when he finally became what yall consider great? BI will be fine lets stop trying to trade this guy away for ever big name yall can think of. This guy is 20!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
PHILosophize
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 10758

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 5:40 am    Post subject:

I really doubt it but I would sure love to be wrong (unless we trade him for Kawhi )
_________________
one dog goes that way the other dog goes the other way
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Raijin
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 08 Feb 2009
Posts: 6576

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 6:03 am    Post subject:

kawhileonard wrote:
I doubt Ingram would do as well as PG13 if he was in OKC.

PG13 was literally the third option behind Russ and HOODY MELO. Also, PG13 didn't become the man until Danny Granger left and this dude carried the pacers against lebron's super Heat teams very well imo.

Ingram has a high ceiling, but dont make it sound like Ingram is there or anywhere near that level yet... PG13 was at a point of time, one of the best players in the NBA

So you're signing with us in 2019, right
_________________
"It was tough," Kobe Bryant said. "But when it got really tough for me, I just checked myself in."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
MJST
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 26383

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 6:04 am    Post subject:

Paul George has signed with the OKC Thunder.

But Playoff P has apparently been an unrestricted free agent since 2016.
_________________
How NBA 2K18 failed the All-Time Lakers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxMBYm3wwxk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
leor_77
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 23 Mar 2012
Posts: 21920

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 6:07 am    Post subject:

The problem is these two weren't mutually exclusive. He and Kawhi are, unless we wait a year.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakers4life78
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 09 Apr 2012
Posts: 1947
Location: Southern California

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 6:09 am    Post subject:

Sentient Meat wrote:
Brandon Ingram 2nd year vs. Paul George 2nd year

Ingram 16.1 PPG 5.3 RPG 3.9 APG 0.8 STL 0.7 BLK
George 12.1 PPG 5.6 RPG 2.4 APG 1.6 STL 0.6 BLK

Wow... inconceivable that BI can ever be as good as PG...

If you go by age... the difference in BI's favor is even more pronounced.


His numbers were also better than Giannis as a second year player. But you know LG, if the guy isn't making the all star team by year 2, ship him out.
_________________
17 time World Champions
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakers4life78
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 09 Apr 2012
Posts: 1947
Location: Southern California

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 6:11 am    Post subject:

I'm sorry someone actually made an argument we should have traded Ingram for George last year because we didn't sign him as an UFA?

Good way to destroy your franchise.
_________________
17 time World Champions
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Aeneas Hunter
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 31763

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 8:06 am    Post subject:

Sentient Meat wrote:
Brandon Ingram 2nd year vs. Paul George 2nd year

Ingram 16.1 PPG 5.3 RPG 3.9 APG 0.8 STL 0.7 BLK
George 12.1 PPG 5.6 RPG 2.4 APG 1.6 STL 0.6 BLK

Wow... inconceivable that BI can ever be as good as PG...

If you go by age... the difference in BI's favor is even more pronounced.


The problem with this sort of argument is that it implicitly assumes that, because one player blossomed, another player will do the same thing. In fact, we could probably find players who were equal to or better than Ingram at the same point, but who never blossomed or even regressed. For example:

Try this one — Ingram vs. Andrew Wiggins

Or this one — Ingram vs. Marvin Williams

So far, Ingram has been sort of the midpoint between Wiggins and Williams. Williams never got close to his ceiling, and Wiggins does not look like he will get there, either. We know Ingram has a high ceiling. The question is whether he will get there, or even close.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
GOODRICH25
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 17 Jun 2017
Posts: 3366

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 10:52 am    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
Really wish this kind of faith in him had been spout before George said no, back when everyone was screaming to trade Ingram for the still injured Kawhi for the past week and a half.


this. and it wasnt just Ingram, but Kuzma + picks as well, while we would waive Randle. thats how much people here valued them
_________________
48 49 50 52 53 54 72 80 82
85 87 88 00 01 02 09 10 20

17 99 19 22 44 13 25 Mic.
52 33 32 42 34 8 24 16 23 3
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
trablos
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 10 May 2017
Posts: 3020

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 2:46 pm    Post subject:

GOODRICH25 wrote:
MJST wrote:
Really wish this kind of faith in him had been spout before George said no, back when everyone was screaming to trade Ingram for the still injured Kawhi for the past week and a half.


this. and it wasnt just Ingram, but Kuzma + picks as well, while we would waive Randle. thats how much people here valued them

It says something that we reluctantly were willing to give up BI for Kawhi, but wouldn't entertain giving up BI for PG.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
SocalDevin
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 May 2016
Posts: 7825
Location: Long Beach

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 2:54 pm    Post subject:

trablos wrote:
GOODRICH25 wrote:
MJST wrote:
Really wish this kind of faith in him had been spout before George said no, back when everyone was screaming to trade Ingram for the still injured Kawhi for the past week and a half.


this. and it wasnt just Ingram, but Kuzma + picks as well, while we would waive Randle. thats how much people here valued them

It says something that we reluctantly were willing to give up BI for Kawhi, but wouldn't entertain giving up BI for PG.


I wouldn't even give up Kuz for PG straight up, so it makes sense to me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
WindyCityLakerFan
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 18 Jul 2002
Posts: 1537
Location: Chicago

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 2:57 pm    Post subject:

lakers4life78 wrote:
I'm sorry someone actually made an argument we should have traded Ingram for George last year because we didn't sign him as an UFA?

Good way to destroy your franchise.


Cough VLF
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LuciusAllen
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 5787

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 3:08 pm    Post subject:

The Lakers are probably approaching kawhi trade talks like the Sixers probably are - by telling the Spurs that the entire roster is available with a few exceptions. And I imagine that Ingram would be one of those exceptions.

If so (and it's all conjecture on my part) ... it's probably likely that SA would say "but Ingram isn't anywhere close to the level of Embiid or Simmons. So we would need BI plus a few other assets." But the Lakers should hold firm, because I think once the season starts, BI will start to show how valuable he really is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
scooterp10
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 04 Oct 2016
Posts: 961

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 3:11 pm    Post subject:

Aeneas Hunter wrote:
Sentient Meat wrote:
Brandon Ingram 2nd year vs. Paul George 2nd year

Ingram 16.1 PPG 5.3 RPG 3.9 APG 0.8 STL 0.7 BLK
George 12.1 PPG 5.6 RPG 2.4 APG 1.6 STL 0.6 BLK

Wow... inconceivable that BI can ever be as good as PG...

If you go by age... the difference in BI's favor is even more pronounced.


The problem with this sort of argument is that it implicitly assumes that, because one player blossomed, another player will do the same thing. In fact, we could probably find players who were equal to or better than Ingram at the same point, but who never blossomed or even regressed. For example:

Try this one — Ingram vs. Andrew Wiggins

Or this one — Ingram vs. Marvin Williams

So far, Ingram has been sort of the midpoint between Wiggins and Williams. Williams never got close to his ceiling, and Wiggins does not look like he will get there, either. We know Ingram has a high ceiling. The question is whether he will get there, or even close.


Ingram looks like a better playmaker then both of those guys.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Fastbreak32
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 11 Oct 2011
Posts: 4746

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 3:21 pm    Post subject:

Sentient Meat wrote:
Brandon Ingram 2nd year vs. Paul George 2nd year

Ingram 16.1 PPG 5.3 RPG 3.9 APG 0.8 STL 0.7 BLK
George 12.1 PPG 5.6 RPG 2.4 APG 1.6 STL 0.6 BLK

Wow... inconceivable that BI can ever be as good as PG...

If you go by age... the difference in BI's favor is even more pronounced.


BPM, DBPM, VROP, and WS tell a different story. Hopefully, Ingram can make a nice leap this coming season, though. We forget how young he is.
_________________
LeBron, AD, & _________. Stay tuned.

"...there was a time when the Israelites were wandering in the desert and all of a sudden, bread came down from heaven,” Pelinka said. “That’s kind of what today feels like for us to have KCP join.”
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Beir32
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 16 Feb 2016
Posts: 1710
Location: Western PA

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 3:29 pm    Post subject:

If the Spurs thought like you then we'd have introduced Kawhi Leonard as a Laker last week.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LuciusAllen
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 5787

PostPosted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 3:32 pm    Post subject:

Fastbreak32 wrote:
Sentient Meat wrote:
Brandon Ingram 2nd year vs. Paul George 2nd year

Ingram 16.1 PPG 5.3 RPG 3.9 APG 0.8 STL 0.7 BLK
George 12.1 PPG 5.6 RPG 2.4 APG 1.6 STL 0.6 BLK

Wow... inconceivable that BI can ever be as good as PG...

If you go by age... the difference in BI's favor is even more pronounced.


BPM, DBPM, VROP, and WS tell a different story. Hopefully, Ingram can make a nice leap this coming season, though. We forget how young he is.

BI was younger than PG during their 2nd seasons.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB