OFFICIAL GENERAL FREE AGENCY/TRADE THREAD
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 1286, 1287, 1288 ... 8558, 8559, 8560  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
LKA
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 06 Oct 2018
Posts: 5181
Location: Sin City

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:09 pm    Post subject:

SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Jesusdelonla wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Would the Blazers look into trading CJ? I think there gonna give this same group another chance and Nurkic will be coming back next year.


I would actually trade Dame before CJ..


4/ingram for Dame


Nah I wouldn’t do it.


Lmao you wouldn't have to do it cuz there's zero chance the Blazers would..


I wouldn't do it either..

Of course there are players worth giving up Ingram/4 for.. Dame isn't one of them in my opinion.


Lol of course you wouldn't.


Of course you would.. Don't respond to me with silliness.


Of course I would because as a logical person I'm aware that Lillard is much better than Ingram. Me and probably 90% of basketball fans would do it if we knew the Blazers were stupid enough to do it.


You left out #4.. I'm not going to go back and forth with you about a scenario that will never happen. I'd also argue there's nothing logical about a poster that's 95% negative when it pertains to one particular player.


#4 in a weak draft. I'm also not going back and forth with someone who wouldn't trade Brandon Ingram for Damian Lillard if the opportunity presented itself.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
SocalDevin
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 May 2016
Posts: 7825
Location: Long Beach

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:10 pm    Post subject:

Jesusdelonla wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Jesusdelonla wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Would the Blazers look into trading CJ? I think there gonna give this same group another chance and Nurkic will be coming back next year.


I would actually trade Dame before CJ..


4/ingram for Dame


Nah I wouldn’t do it.


Lmao you wouldn't have to do it cuz there's zero chance the Blazers would..


I wouldn't do it either..

Of course there are players worth giving up Ingram/4 for.. Dame isn't one of them in my opinion.


Lol of course you wouldn't.


Of course you would.. Don't respond to me with silliness.


Silliness is not knowing Ingram has blood clots and they might come back any time

Don't give me that.. but but he is cleared to play


What's worse? Being silly.. or misinformed, and pontificating as if you are?

Ingram doesn't have blood clots smh..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
CamReddish
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2015
Posts: 7783

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:11 pm    Post subject:

LKA wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Jesusdelonla wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Would the Blazers look into trading CJ? I think there gonna give this same group another chance and Nurkic will be coming back next year.


I would actually trade Dame before CJ..


4/ingram for Dame


Nah I wouldn’t do it.


Lmao you wouldn't have to do it cuz there's zero chance the Blazers would..


I wouldn't do it either..

Of course there are players worth giving up Ingram/4 for.. Dame isn't one of them in my opinion.


Lol of course you wouldn't.


Of course you would.. Don't respond to me with silliness.


Of course I would because as a logical person I'm aware that Lillard is much better than Ingram. Me and probably 90% of basketball fans would do it if we knew the Blazers were stupid enough to do it.


Anyone does that trade except Portland. Wouldn't even think about it. Welcome Dame. Lol. People wouldn't trade Ingram and 4. Lol. Ingram is the one most likely to go anyways because of his cap hold next season and fit in the team. They aren't maxing him.
_________________
Previously LBJ23
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
SocalDevin
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 May 2016
Posts: 7825
Location: Long Beach

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:12 pm    Post subject:

LKA wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Jesusdelonla wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Would the Blazers look into trading CJ? I think there gonna give this same group another chance and Nurkic will be coming back next year.


I would actually trade Dame before CJ..


4/ingram for Dame


Nah I wouldn’t do it.


Lmao you wouldn't have to do it cuz there's zero chance the Blazers would..


I wouldn't do it either..

Of course there are players worth giving up Ingram/4 for.. Dame isn't one of them in my opinion.


Lol of course you wouldn't.


Of course you would.. Don't respond to me with silliness.


Of course I would because as a logical person I'm aware that Lillard is much better than Ingram. Me and probably 90% of basketball fans would do it if we knew the Blazers were stupid enough to do it.


You left out #4.. I'm not going to go back and forth with you about a scenario that will never happen. I'd also argue there's nothing logical about a poster that's 95% negative when it pertains to one particular player.


#4 in a weak draft. I'm also not going back and forth with someone who wouldn't trade Brandon Ingram for Damian Lillard if the opportunity presented itself.


I love how you twist perspectives and argue against a view that wasn't expressed..

We see eye to eye on not going back and forth..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jesusdelonla
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 24 Jan 2018
Posts: 15430

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:12 pm    Post subject:

SocalDevin wrote:
Jesusdelonla wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Jesusdelonla wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Would the Blazers look into trading CJ? I think there gonna give this same group another chance and Nurkic will be coming back next year.


I would actually trade Dame before CJ..


4/ingram for Dame


Nah I wouldn’t do it.


Lmao you wouldn't have to do it cuz there's zero chance the Blazers would..


I wouldn't do it either..

Of course there are players worth giving up Ingram/4 for.. Dame isn't one of them in my opinion.


Lol of course you wouldn't.


Of course you would.. Don't respond to me with silliness.


Silliness is not knowing Ingram has blood clots and they might come back any time

Don't give me that.. but but he is cleared to play


What's worse? Being silly.. or misinformed, and pontificating as if you are?

Ingram doesn't have blood clots smh..


Sure bud now u r a doc supporting the kid you like

Blood clots r unpredictable so don't tell me that nonsense that he doesn't have 1


Last edited by Jesusdelonla on Sat May 18, 2019 8:13 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:12 pm    Post subject:

/throws away popcorn
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
SocalDevin
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 May 2016
Posts: 7825
Location: Long Beach

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:13 pm    Post subject:

You have any idea how silly you sound??? He doesn't have blood clots.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
CamReddish
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2015
Posts: 7783

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:13 pm    Post subject:

SocalDevin wrote:
Jesusdelonla wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Jesusdelonla wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Would the Blazers look into trading CJ? I think there gonna give this same group another chance and Nurkic will be coming back next year.


I would actually trade Dame before CJ..


4/ingram for Dame


Nah I wouldn’t do it.


Lmao you wouldn't have to do it cuz there's zero chance the Blazers would..


I wouldn't do it either..

Of course there are players worth giving up Ingram/4 for.. Dame isn't one of them in my opinion.


Lol of course you wouldn't.


Of course you would.. Don't respond to me with silliness.


Silliness is not knowing Ingram has blood clots and they might come back any time

Don't give me that.. but but he is cleared to play


What's worse? Being silly.. or misinformed, and pontificating as if you are?

Ingram doesn't have blood clots smh..


He did and had it removed. Had a rib removed so it hopefully won't happen again. He 100 percent had a blood clot and it can reoccur. They removed a rib that hopefully fixed the problem
_________________
Previously LBJ23
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
adkindo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 40345
Location: Dirty South

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:14 pm    Post subject:

SocalDevin wrote:
Jesusdelonla wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Jesusdelonla wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Would the Blazers look into trading CJ? I think there gonna give this same group another chance and Nurkic will be coming back next year.


I would actually trade Dame before CJ..


4/ingram for Dame


Nah I wouldn’t do it.


Lmao you wouldn't have to do it cuz there's zero chance the Blazers would..


I wouldn't do it either..

Of course there are players worth giving up Ingram/4 for.. Dame isn't one of them in my opinion.


Lol of course you wouldn't.


Of course you would.. Don't respond to me with silliness.


Silliness is not knowing Ingram has blood clots and they might come back any time

Don't give me that.. but but he is cleared to play


What's worse? Being silly.. or misinformed, and pontificating as if you are?

Ingram doesn't have blood clots smh..


My belief is the NBA has been a little too worried about the Ingram blood clot issue....because of Bosh situation. My reading leads me to believe that Ingrams situation was only fractional as serious as Bosh's, and overwhelming odds are that there should not be an issues going forward.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jesusdelonla
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 24 Jan 2018
Posts: 15430

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:14 pm    Post subject:

SocalDevin wrote:
You have any idea how silly you sound??? He doesn't have blood clots.


Sure if u say it 10more times it will come true.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LKA
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 06 Oct 2018
Posts: 5181
Location: Sin City

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:15 pm    Post subject:

SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Jesusdelonla wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Would the Blazers look into trading CJ? I think there gonna give this same group another chance and Nurkic will be coming back next year.


I would actually trade Dame before CJ..


4/ingram for Dame


Nah I wouldn’t do it.


Lmao you wouldn't have to do it cuz there's zero chance the Blazers would..


I wouldn't do it either..

Of course there are players worth giving up Ingram/4 for.. Dame isn't one of them in my opinion.


Lol of course you wouldn't.


Of course you would.. Don't respond to me with silliness.


Of course I would because as a logical person I'm aware that Lillard is much better than Ingram. Me and probably 90% of basketball fans would do it if we knew the Blazers were stupid enough to do it.


You left out #4.. I'm not going to go back and forth with you about a scenario that will never happen. I'd also argue there's nothing logical about a poster that's 95% negative when it pertains to one particular player.


#4 in a weak draft. I'm also not going back and forth with someone who wouldn't trade Brandon Ingram for Damian Lillard if the opportunity presented itself.


I love how you twist perspectives and argue against a view that wasn't expressed..

We see eye to eye on not going back and forth..


If we see eye to eye on it then why keep responding
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
SocalDevin
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 May 2016
Posts: 7825
Location: Long Beach

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:15 pm    Post subject:

It was related to his rib, not the more serious case of having a blood issue. Which means it's very unlikely to be an issue going forward.

At present he has no blood clot, let alone blood clots.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jesusdelonla
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 24 Jan 2018
Posts: 15430

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:15 pm    Post subject:

adkindo wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
Jesusdelonla wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Jesusdelonla wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Would the Blazers look into trading CJ? I think there gonna give this same group another chance and Nurkic will be coming back next year.


I would actually trade Dame before CJ..


4/ingram for Dame


Nah I wouldn’t do it.


Lmao you wouldn't have to do it cuz there's zero chance the Blazers would..


I wouldn't do it either..

Of course there are players worth giving up Ingram/4 for.. Dame isn't one of them in my opinion.


Lol of course you wouldn't.


Of course you would.. Don't respond to me with silliness.


Silliness is not knowing Ingram has blood clots and they might come back any time

Don't give me that.. but but he is cleared to play


What's worse? Being silly.. or misinformed, and pontificating as if you are?

Ingram doesn't have blood clots smh..


My belief is the NBA has been a little too worried about the Ingram blood clot issue....because of Bosh situation. My reading leads me to believe that Ingrams situation was only fractional as serious as Bosh's, and overwhelming odds are that there should not be an issues going forward.


And nobody can predict when u going to have it next time
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
CamReddish
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2015
Posts: 7783

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:15 pm    Post subject:

adkindo wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
Jesusdelonla wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Jesusdelonla wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Would the Blazers look into trading CJ? I think there gonna give this same group another chance and Nurkic will be coming back next year.


I would actually trade Dame before CJ..


4/ingram for Dame


Nah I wouldn’t do it.


Lmao you wouldn't have to do it cuz there's zero chance the Blazers would..


I wouldn't do it either..

Of course there are players worth giving up Ingram/4 for.. Dame isn't one of them in my opinion.


Lol of course you wouldn't.


Of course you would.. Don't respond to me with silliness.


Silliness is not knowing Ingram has blood clots and they might come back any time

Don't give me that.. but but he is cleared to play


What's worse? Being silly.. or misinformed, and pontificating as if you are?

Ingram doesn't have blood clots smh..


My belief is the NBA has been a little too worried about the Ingram blood clot issue....because of Bosh situation. My reading leads me to believe that Ingrams situation was only fractional as serious as Bosh's, and overwhelming odds are that there should not be an issues going forward.


He did have a blood clot or clots though that was caused by his ribs crowding veins or something so the removed a rib or 2.
_________________
Previously LBJ23
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
SocalDevin
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 May 2016
Posts: 7825
Location: Long Beach

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:15 pm    Post subject:

LKA wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Jesusdelonla wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Would the Blazers look into trading CJ? I think there gonna give this same group another chance and Nurkic will be coming back next year.


I would actually trade Dame before CJ..


4/ingram for Dame


Nah I wouldn’t do it.


Lmao you wouldn't have to do it cuz there's zero chance the Blazers would..


I wouldn't do it either..

Of course there are players worth giving up Ingram/4 for.. Dame isn't one of them in my opinion.


Lol of course you wouldn't.


Of course you would.. Don't respond to me with silliness.


Of course I would because as a logical person I'm aware that Lillard is much better than Ingram. Me and probably 90% of basketball fans would do it if we knew the Blazers were stupid enough to do it.


You left out #4.. I'm not going to go back and forth with you about a scenario that will never happen. I'd also argue there's nothing logical about a poster that's 95% negative when it pertains to one particular player.


#4 in a weak draft. I'm also not going back and forth with someone who wouldn't trade Brandon Ingram for Damian Lillard if the opportunity presented itself.


I love how you twist perspectives and argue against a view that wasn't expressed..

We see eye to eye on not going back and forth..


If we see eye to eye on it then why keep responding


Ask yourself that question..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
CamReddish
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2015
Posts: 7783

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:17 pm    Post subject:

SocalDevin wrote:
It was related to his rib, not the more serious case of having a blood issue. Which means it's very unlikely to be an issue going forward.

At present he has no blood clot, let alone blood clots.


Well he had surgery to remove it and is probably on blood thinners so I hope he doesn't. You make it sound like a non issue.
_________________
Previously LBJ23
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jesusdelonla
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 24 Jan 2018
Posts: 15430

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:18 pm    Post subject:

LBJ23 wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
It was related to his rib, not the more serious case of having a blood issue. Which means it's very unlikely to be an issue going forward.

At present he has no blood clot, let alone blood clots.


Well he had surgery to remove it and is probably on blood thinners so I hope he doesn't. You make it sound like a non issue.


That's a v big issue whether u like it or not
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
SocalDevin
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 26 May 2016
Posts: 7825
Location: Long Beach

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:19 pm    Post subject:

LBJ23 wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
It was related to his rib, not the more serious case of having a blood issue. Which means it's very unlikely to be an issue going forward.

At present he has no blood clot, let alone blood clots.


Well he had surgery to remove it and is probably on blood thinners so I hope he doesn't. You make it sound like a non issue.


What did I say exactly? And what was being said regarding Ingram?

Is it true that he has blood clots???

No it isn't, everything I communicated was accurate.

And yes, it is expected to be a non issue going forward.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LKA
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 06 Oct 2018
Posts: 5181
Location: Sin City

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:19 pm    Post subject:

🤣🤣🤣🤣 aw man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
adkindo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 40345
Location: Dirty South

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:19 pm    Post subject:

Jesusdelonla wrote:
And nobody can predict when u going to have it next time


sure you can...you can claim nobody will know for sure if it will happen again, but the historical study of medicine definitely allows experts to predict and forecast....and like I said, the reading that I have done suggests it is unlikely to be an issue going forward.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jesusdelonla
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 24 Jan 2018
Posts: 15430

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:21 pm    Post subject:

adkindo wrote:
Jesusdelonla wrote:
And nobody can predict when u going to have it next time


sure you can...you can claim nobody will know for sure if it will happen again, but the historical study of medicine definitely allows experts to predict and forecast....and like I said, the reading that I have done suggests it is unlikely to be an issue going forward.


I stand corrected: nobody can predict the next blood clot
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
adkindo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 40345
Location: Dirty South

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:21 pm    Post subject:

LBJ23 wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
It was related to his rib, not the more serious case of having a blood issue. Which means it's very unlikely to be an issue going forward.

At present he has no blood clot, let alone blood clots.


Well he had surgery to remove it and is probably on blood thinners so I hope he doesn't. You make it sound like a non issue.


and the expectation and likely outcome is it will not be an issue once the treatment plan runs its course. If I recall, he should be finished with the blood thinners in June?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jesusdelonla
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 24 Jan 2018
Posts: 15430

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:22 pm    Post subject:

SocalDevin wrote:
LBJ23 wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
It was related to his rib, not the more serious case of having a blood issue. Which means it's very unlikely to be an issue going forward.

At present he has no blood clot, let alone blood clots.


Well he had surgery to remove it and is probably on blood thinners so I hope he doesn't. You make it sound like a non issue.


What did I say exactly? And what was being said regarding Ingram?

Is it true that he has blood clots???

No it isn't, everything I communicated was accurate.

And yes, it is expected to be a non issue going forward.


Objectively speaking u r wrong but who cares
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LKA
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 06 Oct 2018
Posts: 5181
Location: Sin City

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:23 pm    Post subject:

LBJ23 wrote:
LKA wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
LKA wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Jesusdelonla wrote:
SocalDevin wrote:
Inspector Gadget wrote:
Would the Blazers look into trading CJ? I think there gonna give this same group another chance and Nurkic will be coming back next year.


I would actually trade Dame before CJ..


4/ingram for Dame


Nah I wouldn’t do it.


Lmao you wouldn't have to do it cuz there's zero chance the Blazers would..


I wouldn't do it either..

Of course there are players worth giving up Ingram/4 for.. Dame isn't one of them in my opinion.


Lol of course you wouldn't.


Of course you would.. Don't respond to me with silliness.


Of course I would because as a logical person I'm aware that Lillard is much better than Ingram. Me and probably 90% of basketball fans would do it if we knew the Blazers were stupid enough to do it.


Anyone does that trade except Portland. Wouldn't even think about it. Welcome Dame. Lol. People wouldn't trade Ingram and 4. Lol. Ingram is the one most likely to go anyways because of his cap hold next season and fit in the team. They aren't maxing him.


Lol right.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
adkindo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 40345
Location: Dirty South

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 8:24 pm    Post subject:

Jesusdelonla wrote:
adkindo wrote:
Jesusdelonla wrote:
And nobody can predict when u going to have it next time


sure you can...you can claim nobody will know for sure if it will happen again, but the historical study of medicine definitely allows experts to predict and forecast....and like I said, the reading that I have done suggests it is unlikely to be an issue going forward.


I stand corrected: nobody can predict the next blood clot


and again, yes, yes they can predict the odds of another blood clot. They can not guarantee anything, but based on the severity or the clot, the identified cause, and the location of the clot....experts in that area of medicine have definitely given Ingram a solid idea of the likeliness of this happening again.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 1286, 1287, 1288 ... 8558, 8559, 8560  Next
Page 1287 of 8560
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB