| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ksmgf
Star Player
Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 5058
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chronicle
Retired Number
Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Posts: 31935
Location: Manhattan
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 12:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
for 18 years
_________________
Kobe |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 6:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
So she has 2 kids with Blake, and 1 with Leinart.
That's like signing an 18 year, 3m/year contract. Clear winner in free agency (don't know how much she gets from Leinart).
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Leinart apparently pays $15k/month. Wow. So for 3 kids, getting $273k a month.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
numero-ocho
Franchise Player
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 18203
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 6:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wouldn't surprise me if BG ends up being another financial cautionary tale for former athletes. His endorsements seem to have dried up over the last few years because of all the injuries and playoff failures.
Nor surprised one of the Kardashian clan is mixed up in this. I am surprised someone else beat them to the money. Some day, someone should do a 30 for 30 documentary on the Kardashian effect on professional sports.
_________________
"Suck it up. Don't be a baby. Do your job." - Kobe Bryant |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gimme_the_rock
Franchise Player
Joined: 13 Apr 2001
Posts: 11882
Location: Looking outta the window, watching the asphalt grow ...
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| yinoma2001 wrote: | | Leinart apparently pays $15k/month. Wow. So for 3 kids, getting $273k a month. |
What??
How is he supposed to cover that? Are those things adjustable for when an athlete flops?
_________________
We back. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gimme_the_rock
Franchise Player
Joined: 13 Apr 2001
Posts: 11882
Location: Looking outta the window, watching the asphalt grow ...
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| numero-ocho wrote: | Wouldn't surprise me if BG ends up being another financial cautionary tale for former athletes. His endorsements seem to have dried up over the last few years because of all the injuries and playoff failures.
Nor surprised one of the Kardashian clan is mixed up in this. I am surprised someone else beat them to the money. Some day, someone should do a 30 for 30 documentary on the Kardashian effect on professional sports. |
The dudes that wind up with those "ladies" deserve everything they have coming to them.
_________________
We back. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
non-player zealot
Franchise Player
Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Posts: 21365
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Chronicle wrote: | | for 18 years |
For pain and suffering caused by being left with a red headed child.
_________________
GOAT MAGIC REEL
SEDALE TRIBUTE
EDDIE DONX! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Gimme_the_rock
Franchise Player
Joined: 13 Apr 2001
Posts: 11882
Location: Looking outta the window, watching the asphalt grow ...
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| non-player zealot wrote: | | Chronicle wrote: | | for 18 years |
For pain and suffering caused by being left with a red headed child. |
ROFLMAO!!
_________________
We back. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Gimme_the_rock wrote: | | yinoma2001 wrote: | | Leinart apparently pays $15k/month. Wow. So for 3 kids, getting $273k a month. |
What??
How is he supposed to cover that? Are those things adjustable for when an athlete flops? |
Yes, change of financial circumstances will do that. But that'll be years away when their financial situation has deteriorated.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cutheon
Franchise Player
Joined: 10 Jul 2009
Posts: 12161
Location: Bay Area
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 9:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Would be cheaper just to move some family into his house and fight to keep his kids. Oh well. He’s a piece of (bleep) that thinks being a father is beneath him. Good for Brynn |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ksmgf
Star Player
Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 5058
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 9:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| non-player zealot wrote: | | Chronicle wrote: | | for 18 years |
For pain and suffering caused by being left with a red headed child. |
I don't think his career will last 18 years! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Laker_Town
Retired Number
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 25604
|
| Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Excessive and another casualty of the kartrashians. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PengShow
Starting Rotation
Joined: 01 Jul 2018
Posts: 743
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2018 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
These stars are stupid, go get your sperm frozen and get a vasectomy.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lakersken80
Retired Number
Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Posts: 38780
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2018 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yinoma2001 wrote: | So she has 2 kids with Blake, and 1 with Leinart.
That's like signing an 18 year, 3m/year contract. Clear winner in free agency (don't know how much she gets from Leinart). |
She mastered the system. Unfortunately, these athletes don't learn. After his career is over, he'll still be paying child support. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cathy78
Star Player
Joined: 21 Jan 2013
Posts: 1415
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 3:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lakersken80 wrote: | | yinoma2001 wrote: | So she has 2 kids with Blake, and 1 with Leinart.
That's like signing an 18 year, 3m/year contract. Clear winner in free agency (don't know how much she gets from Leinart). |
She mastered the system. Unfortunately, these athletes don't learn. After his career is over, he'll still be paying child support. |
Isn't his career already over? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aeneas Hunter
Retired Number
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 31763
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lakersken80 wrote: | | yinoma2001 wrote: | So she has 2 kids with Blake, and 1 with Leinart.
That's like signing an 18 year, 3m/year contract. Clear winner in free agency (don't know how much she gets from Leinart). |
She mastered the system. Unfortunately, these athletes don't learn. After his career is over, he'll still be paying child support. |
I don’t understand how this works in California. I can’t imagine how a court could order that much in child support. I understand the high income level, but it’s still child support. How does it take $258k per month to support a child? I suspect that there is more to this story than just court-ordered child support. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Omar Little
Moderator
Joined: 02 May 2005
Posts: 90306
Location: Formerly Known As 24
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
I read somewhere that this is not true, that it is actually 32k per month.
_________________
“We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” ― Elie Wiesel |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jonnybravo
Retired Number
Joined: 21 Sep 2007
Posts: 30680
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
slavavov
Star Player
Joined: 03 Oct 2003
Posts: 8330
Location: Santa Monica
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Even 32k a month for child support is extremely ridiculous.
Shows you how stupid and flawed some celebrities are, Griffin for making bad decisions off the court and maybe thinking he's invincible, and Cameron for being greedy and possibly having an agenda when she hooked up with him.
Money, fame and power is such a double edged sword.
_________________
Lakers 49ers Chargers Dodgers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ksmgf
Star Player
Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 5058
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Omar Little wrote: | | I read somewhere that this is not true, that it is actually 32k per month. |
Yeah the initial report wasn't accurate. 32k per month seems more reasonable. Just wondering if she really spends all the money on the kids. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
adkindo
Retired Number
Joined: 16 Jun 2005
Posts: 40345
Location: Dirty South
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I would just inject that the primary purpose of determining an amount for child support is to protect the child from the economic impact associated with a divorce or separation of parents. Therefore in theory, if the child is use to living a particular lifestyle, and after the separation one parent can continue to provide that lifestyle while the other is unable...the courts will attempt to close that gap in lifestyle as much as possible. So if one parent is earning over $30 Million a year, and the other is earning less than $100K annually.....it is going to take a large number to provide that child a similar lifestyle with the lower income parent. The court is not overly concerned if one parent appears to significantly benefit as long as the child is protected. That is why we see these cases that seem crazy on the surface where a parent learns they are not even the biological parent, but are forced to pay child support. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jonnybravo
Retired Number
Joined: 21 Sep 2007
Posts: 30680
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| slavavov wrote: |
Even 32k a month for child support is extremely ridiculous.
Shows you how stupid and flawed some celebrities are, Griffin for making bad decisions off the court and maybe thinking he's invincible, and Cameron for being greedy and possibly having an agenda when she hooked up with him.
Money, fame and power is such a double edged sword. |
Half a million a year between Blake and Leinart for child support.
_________________
KOBE |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
slavavov
Star Player
Joined: 03 Oct 2003
Posts: 8330
Location: Santa Monica
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 05, 2018 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| adkindo wrote: | | I would just inject that the primary purpose of determining an amount for child support is to protect the child from the economic impact associated with a divorce or separation of parents. Therefore in theory, if the child is use to living a particular lifestyle, and after the separation one parent can continue to provide that lifestyle while the other is unable...the courts will attempt to close that gap in lifestyle as much as possible. So if one parent is earning over $30 Million a year, and the other is earning less than $100K annually.....it is going to take a large number to provide that child a similar lifestyle with the lower income parent. The court is not overly concerned if one parent appears to significantly benefit as long as the child is protected. That is why we see these cases that seem crazy on the surface where a parent learns they are not even the biological parent, but are forced to pay child support. |
Scary how a working class girl can become a groupie, follow these guys around with the agenda of marrying one and then getting a divorce/making him pay child support.
Hey, it's more realistic for them than winning the lottery!
_________________
Lakers 49ers Chargers Dodgers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aeneas Hunter
Retired Number
Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 31763
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2018 4:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| adkindo wrote: | | I would just inject that the primary purpose of determining an amount for child support is to protect the child from the economic impact associated with a divorce or separation of parents. Therefore in theory, if the child is use to living a particular lifestyle, and after the separation one parent can continue to provide that lifestyle while the other is unable...the courts will attempt to close that gap in lifestyle as much as possible. So if one parent is earning over $30 Million a year, and the other is earning less than $100K annually.....it is going to take a large number to provide that child a similar lifestyle with the lower income parent. The court is not overly concerned if one parent appears to significantly benefit as long as the child is protected. That is why we see these cases that seem crazy on the surface where a parent learns they are not even the biological parent, but are forced to pay child support. |
The primary purpose of child support is providing for the needs of the child. Child support is not permissible to subsidize the lifestyle of the lower income parent. Most states have some sort of cap on the amount of child support that can awarded. The courts usually have flexibility to exceed that amount in rare cases, but child support is not alimony. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
