According to multiple league executives, Dunn’s trade value is low to nonexistent. So a direct trade with the Lakers centered on Dunn and the No. 7 pick doesn’t seem feasible. However, the Bulls could be in position to facilitate a three-team deal in which the Lakers acquire Davis from the Pelicans.
They sure were.
But I wonder how LeBron feels about going even younger
(bleep) LeBron
Such a weird stance to have against a player who can help the team win.
I go back and forth on him. Sometimes he's cool to me but realistically speaking we probably shouldn't have signed him
That was my take about not signing him.
But since he's here, I gotta root for him.
I actually started appreciating his game after watching him more closely for a year.
Joined: 16 Jun 2005 Posts: 40345 Location: Dirty South
Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 6:45 pm Post subject:
BigGameHames wrote:
adkindo wrote:
BigGameHames wrote:
Turns out Garland and Reddish are the guys who will be heavily debated this year. Ironically, I don’t think we’ll take either after all this debate.
based on?
Reddish is the furthest from being ready to contribute of the guys in that range and I think Lebrons timeline is a big factor. Garland for similar reasons, small guards take time to adjust and he may be tough to get on the floor in big games his rookie season because of defense. I think they want an immediate contributor which would be Hunter, Culver, or White. With that said, if Garland kills his workout I can see them taking a risk on him at the expense of LeBron timeline but he’d need to really show out.
I am at a loss how anyone can watch this and claim Cam is not ready to contribute....
Joined: 06 Oct 2018 Posts: 5181 Location: Sin City
Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 6:51 pm Post subject:
adkindo wrote:
BigGameHames wrote:
adkindo wrote:
BigGameHames wrote:
Turns out Garland and Reddish are the guys who will be heavily debated this year. Ironically, I don’t think we’ll take either after all this debate.
based on?
Reddish is the furthest from being ready to contribute of the guys in that range and I think Lebrons timeline is a big factor. Garland for similar reasons, small guards take time to adjust and he may be tough to get on the floor in big games his rookie season because of defense. I think they want an immediate contributor which would be Hunter, Culver, or White. With that said, if Garland kills his workout I can see them taking a risk on him at the expense of LeBron timeline but he’d need to really show out.
I am at a loss how anyone can watch this and claim Cam is not ready to contribute....
He is very talented and looks so good to the eye that I am willing to completely ignore the stats
Joined: 16 Jun 2005 Posts: 40345 Location: Dirty South
Posted: Sun May 19, 2019 6:55 pm Post subject:
LKA wrote:
adkindo wrote:
BigGameHames wrote:
adkindo wrote:
BigGameHames wrote:
Turns out Garland and Reddish are the guys who will be heavily debated this year. Ironically, I don’t think we’ll take either after all this debate.
based on?
Reddish is the furthest from being ready to contribute of the guys in that range and I think Lebrons timeline is a big factor. Garland for similar reasons, small guards take time to adjust and he may be tough to get on the floor in big games his rookie season because of defense. I think they want an immediate contributor which would be Hunter, Culver, or White. With that said, if Garland kills his workout I can see them taking a risk on him at the expense of LeBron timeline but he’d need to really show out.
I am at a loss how anyone can watch this and claim Cam is not ready to contribute....
He is very talented and looks so good to the eye that I am willing to completely ignore the stats
he was not consistent last year....there is no denying that....but people are telling me he can't do things I have seen him do at an extremely high level. He was dominant in that game on both ends of the court...and there were a handful of games last year where Reddish played at that level.
Turns out Garland and Reddish are the guys who will be heavily debated this year. Ironically, I don’t think we’ll take either after all this debate.
based on?
Reddish is the furthest from being ready to contribute of the guys in that range and I think Lebrons timeline is a big factor. Garland for similar reasons, small guards take time to adjust and he may be tough to get on the floor in big games his rookie season because of defense. I think they want an immediate contributor which would be Hunter, Culver, or White. With that said, if Garland kills his workout I can see them taking a risk on him at the expense of LeBron timeline but he’d need to really show out.
I am at a loss how anyone can watch this and claim Cam is not ready to contribute....
He is very talented and looks so good to the eye that I am willing to completely ignore the stats
You guys are falling for the workout warrior syndrome. Looks awesome with no one around him.....freezes up upon action. He is a Jeff Green type. I would pass.
Garland if he shows out in his workouts. or trade down with Phoenix or Cleveland, or Chicago for a lot of assets plus their pick and select Hunter, Culver, Clarke, White
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
