OFFICIAL Lakers 2019 Draft & Draft Prospects Thread (Lakers Pick #4)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 40, 41, 42 ... 47, 48, 49  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
noahp45
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 6572
Location: Oceanside Ca

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 12:42 pm    Post subject:

Kobesystem wrote:
Lakers have too many young players though on the roster.

Kuzma, Ingram, Ball, Hart, Wagner, #4 pick......

Team needs to learn how to trade high for once


Thats what they should have. Time to move forward.

Gs had a bunch young dudes they bloomed
Philly, the bucs and Boston. All young teams that bloomed

Why can't Kuz,Ball Hart become a good team?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LKA
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 06 Oct 2018
Posts: 5181
Location: Sin City

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 12:48 pm    Post subject:

noahp45 wrote:
Kobesystem wrote:
Lakers have too many young players though on the roster.

Kuzma, Ingram, Ball, Hart, Wagner, #4 pick......

Team needs to learn how to trade high for once


Thats what they should have. Time to move forward.

Gs had a bunch young dudes they bloomed
Philly, the bucs and Boston. All young teams that bloomed

Why can't Kuz,Ball Hart become a good team?


Because none of them are Giannis, Steph or Embiid. Can't even shoot a respectable % from the freethrow line
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Pidge
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 11 Oct 2012
Posts: 440

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 12:57 pm    Post subject:

I don't expect much more from Kuzma beyond his current level, but that's still a very useful player. Ingram and Ball have every chance to be significant players in playoff contention. Hart needs to settle, we need consistency from him more than anything. No idea about Wagner yet, needs to improve a lot, but I like him. Don't know how moving any of them right now could be interpreted as "trading high" though.

Trading that group away for a short-term max is nuts in my opinion. If we're trading for AD, it's at the deadline, not now.
_________________
"I got Wheaties!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
noahp45
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 6572
Location: Oceanside Ca

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 1:18 pm    Post subject:

LKA wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
Kobesystem wrote:
Lakers have too many young players though on the roster.

Kuzma, Ingram, Ball, Hart, Wagner, #4 pick......

Team needs to learn how to trade high for once


Thats what they should have. Time to move forward.

Gs had a bunch young dudes they bloomed
Philly, the bucs and Boston. All young teams that bloomed

Why can't Kuz,Ball Hart become a good team?


Because none of them are Giannis, Steph or Embiid. Can't even shoot a respectable % from the freethrow line


So they cant fix that? DeAndre Jordan proved that it can be fixed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
noahp45
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 6572
Location: Oceanside Ca

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 1:35 pm    Post subject:

Culver is Butler with out the attitude
Hunter is a more athletic Klay
Morant is a healthy D rose
White is a poor man's Harden
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lakerchaq
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 07 May 2019
Posts: 300

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 1:52 pm    Post subject:

Would you trade lonzo for reddish?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LKA
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 06 Oct 2018
Posts: 5181
Location: Sin City

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 1:53 pm    Post subject:

noahp45 wrote:
Culver is Butler with out the attitude
Hunter is a more athletic Klay
Morant is a healthy D rose
White is a poor man's Harden


Hunter is not Klay Thompson lmao

Keep in mind he's shooting that nice percentage you see on under 3 attempts per.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
noahp45
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 6572
Location: Oceanside Ca

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 1:54 pm    Post subject:

LKA wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
Culver is Butler with out the attitude
Hunter is a more athletic Klay
Morant is a healthy D rose
White is a poor man's Harden


Hunter is not Klay Thompson lmao

Keep in mind he's shooting that nice percentage you see on under 3 attempts per.



True but he can shoot. Beautiful form and can defend
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LKA
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 06 Oct 2018
Posts: 5181
Location: Sin City

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 1:57 pm    Post subject:

noahp45 wrote:
LKA wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
Culver is Butler with out the attitude
Hunter is a more athletic Klay
Morant is a healthy D rose
White is a poor man's Harden


Hunter is not Klay Thompson lmao

Keep in mind he's shooting that nice percentage you see on under 3 attempts per.



True but he can shoot. Beautiful form and can defend


I'm wary .. certain guys don't translate to shooters in the league
Ingram shot over 40% in college
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LKA
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 06 Oct 2018
Posts: 5181
Location: Sin City

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 1:57 pm    Post subject:

My mind keeps flip flopping .. at first I was thinking Reddish or Hunter

Now I'm thinking Reddish or Garland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
audioaxes
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 12573

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 1:58 pm    Post subject:

LKA wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
Culver is Butler with out the attitude
Hunter is a more athletic Klay
Morant is a healthy D rose
White is a poor man's Harden


Hunter is not Klay Thompson lmao

Keep in mind he's shooting that nice percentage you see on under 3 attempts per.

he has a long ways to go to get near Klay's shooting ability but I wouldnt put it out of possibility that his ceiling can reach that of a longer, stronger Klay without the threat of exploding for 40+ point games
another comp could be a Kris Middleton
_________________
(bleep) Kawhi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LKA
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 06 Oct 2018
Posts: 5181
Location: Sin City

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 1:59 pm    Post subject:

audioaxes wrote:
LKA wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
Culver is Butler with out the attitude
Hunter is a more athletic Klay
Morant is a healthy D rose
White is a poor man's Harden


Hunter is not Klay Thompson lmao

Keep in mind he's shooting that nice percentage you see on under 3 attempts per.

he has a long ways to go to get near Klay's shooting ability but I wouldnt put it out of possibility that his ceiling can reach that of a longer, stronger Klay without the threat of exploding for 40+ point games
another comp could be a Kris Middleton


Middleton is a good one ..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LKA
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 06 Oct 2018
Posts: 5181
Location: Sin City

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 2:01 pm    Post subject:

Middleton as his ceiling is good.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakersForever123
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Oct 2012
Posts: 2261

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 2:02 pm    Post subject:

LKA wrote:
My mind keeps flip flopping .. at first I was thinking Reddish or Hunter

Now I'm thinking Reddish or Garland



I do it too. I think both are good. Also, part of me thinks we should go after Sekou Doumbaya.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jack's Room
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 24 Nov 2018
Posts: 316

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 3:20 pm    Post subject:

LKA wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
LKA wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
Culver is Butler with out the attitude
Hunter is a more athletic Klay
Morant is a healthy D rose
White is a poor man's Harden


Hunter is not Klay Thompson lmao

Keep in mind he's shooting that nice percentage you see on under 3 attempts per.



True but he can shoot. Beautiful form and can defend


I'm wary .. certain guys don't translate to shooters in the league
Ingram shot over 40% in college


For the past few years, Nylon Calculus has put forward a prediction formula for how college 3PT shooting translates to the NBA. With a few minor exceptions, they've been completely on the money within 1-3% on most every prospect. It turns out FT% is more correlated to NBA 3PT success than NCAA 3PT%. The reason for that is fairly simple: almost every variable can be controlled for as every player shoots the exact same unguarded shot at the exact same distance.

Ingram shot 68.2% from the line at Duke, which is almost exactly his NBA average: 66.2%. Lonzo shot 67.3% from the line at UCLA and has been even worse in the NBA: 43.7%. Hunter shot 77.3% in two years at Virginia (75.5% frosh/78.3% soph) which bodes well for his NBA future. As of February 10th, Synergy logged Hunter at 13/24 (54.2%) from NBA 3PT range. Obviously a tiny sample size, but it's another positive data point for him. The NBA 3PT numbers for Coby White 31/73 (42.1%) and Jarrett Culver 11/37 (29.7%) are also worth paying attention to as both are players in our drafting range. From the line, White finished the year at 80% while Culver shot 70.7%.

Poor free throw shooting is a giant red flag for me. It's the reason I'm so low on Kevin Porter Jr. despite his aesthetically pleasing game and 41.2% 3PT numbers, he shot an awful 52.2% at the stripe. It's a small sample size in both cases, but it seems likely KPJ is not somehow an excellent long-distance shooter and a poor free throw shooter. The truth lies somewhere in the middle, but it seems like a gamble for a guy who already has character concerns.

All of this to say, the best way to predict 3PT shooting in the NBA is to pay attention to free throw numbers and consistent shooting form. Jayson Tatum was disappointing from 3PT range at Duke (34.2%) but shot an impressive 84.9% from the line. Oddly enough, Cam Reddish is probably being underrated as a shooter for similar reasons: 33.3% 3PT and 77.2% FT. It's entirely possible that Reddish got caught in a bad sample size of shooting as he adjusted to a new team and level of talent. Buddy Hield was miserable as as a freshman at OU and his first 25 games in the NBA (36.8%/29.1%/86.7%). But he adjusted and his shooting numbers leveled out in both cases. Hield is shooting 44.6%/41.9%/87.4% through NBA three seasons. I don't think Reddish is a Hield-caliber shooter, but he's probably much better than what he showed his freshman year.

Private workouts and scrimmages should help weed out the bad shooters. There were well-sourced rumors that Josh Jackson shot miserably at his Lakers workout. Jackson was another poor free throw shooter (56.6%) with decent 3PT numbers (37.8%) but had a noticeably inconsistent and wonky shooting form in college. Despite his athletic gifts, it's no surprise that Jackson's been awful in the NBA through two seasons (41.5%/29.4%/65%). In fact, Nylon Calculus predicted Jackson would shoot 32% from 3PT range in the NBA before he was drafted.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LKA
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 06 Oct 2018
Posts: 5181
Location: Sin City

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 3:25 pm    Post subject:

Jack's Room wrote:
For the past few years, Nylon Calculus has put forward a prediction formula for how college 3PT shooting translates to the NBA. With a few minor exceptions, they've been completely on the money within 1-3% on most every prospect. It turns out FT% is more correlated to NBA 3PT success than NCAA 3PT%. The reason for that is fairly simple: almost every variable can be controlled for as every player shoots the exact same unguarded shot at the exact same distance.

Ingram shot 68.2% from the line at Duke, which is almost exactly his NBA average: 66.2%. Lonzo shot 67.3% from the line at UCLA and has been even worse in the NBA: 43.7%. Hunter shot 77.3% in two years at Virginia (75.5% frosh/78.3% soph) which bodes well for his NBA future. As of February 10th, Synergy logged Hunter at 13/24 (54.2%) from NBA 3PT range. Obviously a tiny sample size, but it's another positive data point for him. The NBA 3PT numbers for Coby White 31/73 (42.1%) and Jarrett Culver 11/37 (29.7%) are also worth paying attention to as both are players in our drafting range. From the line, White finished the year at 80% while Culver shot 70.7%.

Poor free throw shooting is a giant red flag for me. It's the reason I'm so low on Kevin Porter Jr. despite his aesthetically pleasing game and 41.2% 3PT numbers, he shot an awful 52.2% at the stripe. It's a small sample size in both cases, but it seems likely KPJ is not somehow an excellent long-distance shooter and a poor free throw shooter. The truth lies somewhere in the middle, but it seems like a gamble for a guy who already has character concerns.

All of this to say, the best way to predict 3PT shooting in the NBA is to pay attention to free throw numbers and consistent shooting form. Jayson Tatum was disappointing from 3PT range at Duke (34.2%) but shot an impressive 84.9% from the line. Oddly enough, Cam Reddish is probably being underrated as a shooter for similar reasons: 33.3% 3PT and 77.2% FT. It's entirely possible that Reddish got caught in a bad sample size of shooting as he adjusted to a new team and level of talent. Buddy Hield was miserable as as a freshman at OU and his first 25 games in the NBA (36.8%/29.1%/86.7%). But he adjusted and his shooting numbers leveled out in both cases. Hield is shooting 44.6%/41.9%/87.4% through NBA three seasons. I don't think Reddish is a Hield-caliber shooter, but he's probably much better than what he showed his freshman year.

Private workouts and scrimmages should help weed out the bad shooters. There were well-sourced rumors that Josh Jackson shot miserably at his Lakers workout. Jackson was another poor free throw shooter (56.6%) with decent 3PT numbers (37.8%) but had a noticeably inconsistent and wonky shooting form in college. Despite his athletic gifts, it's no surprise that Jackson's been awful in the NBA through two seasons (41.5%/29.4%/65%). In fact, Nylon Calculus predicted Jackson would shoot 32% from 3PT range in the NBA before he was drafted.


This was a great read thanks man. That's very true good shooters are always good freethrow shooters.

I know they're sleeping on Reddish who is my personal favorite prospect. Mainly because I feel his game will take off at the next level ..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LandsbergerRules
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 11197
Location: The Other Perspective

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 3:37 pm    Post subject:

Jack's Room wrote:
Ingram shot 68.2% from the line at Duke, which is almost exactly his NBA average: 66.2%. Lonzo shot 67.3% from the line at UCLA and has been even worse in the NBA: 43.7%. Hunter shot 77.3% in two years at Virginia (75.5% frosh/78.3% soph) which bodes well for his NBA future. As of February 10th, Synergy logged Hunter at 13/24 (54.2%) from NBA 3PT range. Obviously a tiny sample size, but it's another positive data point for him. The NBA 3PT numbers for Coby White 31/73 (42.1%) and Jarrett Culver 11/37 (29.7%) are also worth paying attention to as both are players in our drafting range. From the line, White finished the year at 80% while Culver shot 70.7%.


I wonder how rare Zo's steep dropoff at the line is historically. Seems completely out of the ordinary.
_________________
"Chick lived and breathed Lakers basketball…but he was also fair and objective and called every game the way it was played."
-from Chick: His Unpublished Memoirs and the Memories of Those Who Knew Him
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
joeblow
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Nov 2008
Posts: 3088

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 4:05 pm    Post subject:

Of all the players likely available at #4, I would like to see us snag Hunter if we plan to keep whoever we get. I put a premium on defense, and he has the best offensive upside out of the players predicted to be available for us that can D up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jesusdelonla
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 24 Jan 2018
Posts: 15430

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 4:37 pm    Post subject:

Kyrie played only 11 games for Duke. for whatever its worth
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
PHILosopher
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 14 Jul 2014
Posts: 168

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 4:48 pm    Post subject:

[quote="LKA"]
Jack's Room wrote:
For the past few years, Nylon Calculus has put forward a prediction formula for how college 3PT shooting translates to the NBA. With a few minor exceptions, they've been completely on the money within 1-3% on most every prospect. It turns out FT% is more correlated to NBA 3PT success than NCAA 3PT%. The reason for that is fairly simple: almost every variable can be controlled for as every player shoots the exact same unguarded shot at the exact same distance.

Ingram shot 68.2% from the line at Duke, which is almost exactly his NBA average: 66.2%. Lonzo shot 67.3% from the line at UCLA and has been even worse in the NBA: 43.7%. Hunter shot 77.3% in two years at Virginia (75.5% frosh/78.3% soph) which bodes well for his NBA future. As of February 10th, Synergy logged Hunter at 13/24 (54.2%) from NBA 3PT range. Obviously a tiny sample size, but it's another positive data point for him. The NBA 3PT numbers for Coby White 31/73 (42.1%) and Jarrett Culver 11/37 (29.7%) are also worth paying attention to as both are players in our drafting range. From the line, White finished the year at 80% while Culver shot 70.7%.

Poor free throw shooting is a giant red flag for me. It's the reason I'm so low on Kevin Porter Jr. despite his aesthetically pleasing game and 41.2% 3PT numbers, he shot an awful 52.2% at the stripe. It's a small sample size in both cases, but it seems likely KPJ is not somehow an excellent long-distance shooter and a poor free throw shooter. The truth lies somewhere in the middle, but it seems like a gamble for a guy who already has character concerns.

All of this to say, the best way to predict 3PT shooting in the NBA is to pay attention to free throw numbers and consistent shooting form. Jayson Tatum was disappointing from 3PT range at Duke (34.2%) but shot an impressive 84.9% from the line. Oddly enough, Cam Reddish is probably being underrated as a shooter for similar reasons: 33.3% 3PT and 77.2% FT. It's entirely possible that Reddish got caught in a bad sample size of shooting as he adjusted to a new team and level of talent. Buddy Hield was miserable as as a freshman at OU and his first 25 games in the NBA (36.8%/29.1%/86.7%). But he adjusted and his shooting numbers leveled out in both cases. Hield is shooting 44.6%/41.9%/87.4% through NBA three seasons. I don't think Reddish is a Hield-caliber shooter, but he's probably much better than what he showed his freshman year.

Private workouts and scrimmages should help weed out the bad shooters. There were well-sourced rumors that Josh Jackson shot miserably at his Lakers workout. Jackson was another poor free throw shooter (56.6%) with decent 3PT numbers (37.8%) but had a noticeably inconsistent and wonky shooting form in college. Despite his athletic gifts, it's no surprise that Jackson's been awful in the NBA through two seasons (41.5%/29.4%/65%). In fact, Nylon Calculus predicted Jackson would shoot 32% from 3PT range in the NBA before he was drafted.


I read elsewhere that this is one of the reasons that Tyler Herro could be a sleeper in this draft. He's long, good height, athletic, ds up and his free throw percentages are in the mid 90s although 3p averages are in the mid 30s. I'm not saying we should take him with the 4th pick! But he has potential.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerLogic
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 27 Mar 2005
Posts: 17886

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 4:51 pm    Post subject:

Tyler Herro has a shorter wingspan than his height.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Jack's Room
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 24 Nov 2018
Posts: 316

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 5:01 pm    Post subject:

PHILosopher wrote:
Jack's Room wrote:
For the past few years, Nylon Calculus has put forward a prediction formula for how college 3PT shooting translates to the NBA. With a few minor exceptions, they've been completely on the money within 1-3% on most every prospect. It turns out FT% is more correlated to NBA 3PT success than NCAA 3PT%. The reason for that is fairly simple: almost every variable can be controlled for as every player shoots the exact same unguarded shot at the exact same distance.

Ingram shot 68.2% from the line at Duke, which is almost exactly his NBA average: 66.2%. Lonzo shot 67.3% from the line at UCLA and has been even worse in the NBA: 43.7%. Hunter shot 77.3% in two years at Virginia (75.5% frosh/78.3% soph) which bodes well for his NBA future. As of February 10th, Synergy logged Hunter at 13/24 (54.2%) from NBA 3PT range. Obviously a tiny sample size, but it's another positive data point for him. The NBA 3PT numbers for Coby White 31/73 (42.1%) and Jarrett Culver 11/37 (29.7%) are also worth paying attention to as both are players in our drafting range. From the line, White finished the year at 80% while Culver shot 70.7%.

Poor free throw shooting is a giant red flag for me. It's the reason I'm so low on Kevin Porter Jr. despite his aesthetically pleasing game and 41.2% 3PT numbers, he shot an awful 52.2% at the stripe. It's a small sample size in both cases, but it seems likely KPJ is not somehow an excellent long-distance shooter and a poor free throw shooter. The truth lies somewhere in the middle, but it seems like a gamble for a guy who already has character concerns.

All of this to say, the best way to predict 3PT shooting in the NBA is to pay attention to free throw numbers and consistent shooting form. Jayson Tatum was disappointing from 3PT range at Duke (34.2%) but shot an impressive 84.9% from the line. Oddly enough, Cam Reddish is probably being underrated as a shooter for similar reasons: 33.3% 3PT and 77.2% FT. It's entirely possible that Reddish got caught in a bad sample size of shooting as he adjusted to a new team and level of talent. Buddy Hield was miserable as as a freshman at OU and his first 25 games in the NBA (36.8%/29.1%/86.7%). But he adjusted and his shooting numbers leveled out in both cases. Hield is shooting 44.6%/41.9%/87.4% through NBA three seasons. I don't think Reddish is a Hield-caliber shooter, but he's probably much better than what he showed his freshman year.

Private workouts and scrimmages should help weed out the bad shooters. There were well-sourced rumors that Josh Jackson shot miserably at his Lakers workout. Jackson was another poor free throw shooter (56.6%) with decent 3PT numbers (37.8%) but had a noticeably inconsistent and wonky shooting form in college. Despite his athletic gifts, it's no surprise that Jackson's been awful in the NBA through two seasons (41.5%/29.4%/65%). In fact, Nylon Calculus predicted Jackson would shoot 32% from 3PT range in the NBA before he was drafted.


I read elsewhere that this is one of the reasons that Tyler Herro could be a sleeper in this draft. He's long, good height, athletic, ds up and his free throw percentages are in the mid 90s although 3p averages are in the mid 30s. I'm not saying we should take him with the 4th pick! But he has potential.


Herro actually has a negative length (6'6 in shoes, 6'3.25" wingspan) which isn't a great indicator However, unlike other shooters like Nik Stauskas or Svi Mykhailiuk, Herro did post better defensive numbers in college (steal%, DWS, Drtg, DBPM). He's the kind of guy you pray is a capable team defender, so you can keep his shooting ability on the floor.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
PHILosopher
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 14 Jul 2014
Posts: 168

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 5:03 pm    Post subject:

LakerLogic wrote:
Tyler Herro has a shorter wingspan than his height.


Okay so scratch the long part. Watching him play this year he looked like Kentucky's best perimeter defender. But yeah short wingspan.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lakers_Jester
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 17 Sep 2012
Posts: 5366

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 5:09 pm    Post subject:

What u guys think r the odds we keep the pick?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Runway8
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Posts: 22839
Location: La Jolla, San Diego

PostPosted: Sat May 18, 2019 7:56 pm    Post subject:

Lakers_Jester wrote:
What u guys think r the odds we keep the pick?


Very low if the Lakers had it their way. They wanna be players, movers and shakers, bring "Laker" basketball back to LA, whatever "Laker" basketball means. They are open for business, but the media will have you believe nobody is interested.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 40, 41, 42 ... 47, 48, 49  Next
Page 41 of 49
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB