OFFICIAL Lakers 2019 Draft & Draft Prospects Thread (Lakers Pick #4)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 24, 25, 26 ... 47, 48, 49  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
noahp45
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 6572
Location: Oceanside Ca

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 11:23 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
Mike@LG wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
#StayInYoLane wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
Garland is another Fultz in my OPINION, I wouldn't draft him.


What makes you say that?


Overhyped guy that will get drafted higher then what he rates.

Dude played 5 games last year, no I take that back 4 games.....wow


Methinks you didn't watch. But Ok.


Watch Fultz play or Garland play?


But you said Garland only played 4 games. So what are you basing this on?


Mike said I didn't watch, I was asking who didn't I watch?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 11:24 am    Post subject:

noahp45 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
Mike@LG wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
#StayInYoLane wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
Garland is another Fultz in my OPINION, I wouldn't draft him.


What makes you say that?


Overhyped guy that will get drafted higher then what he rates.

Dude played 5 games last year, no I take that back 4 games.....wow


Methinks you didn't watch. But Ok.


Watch Fultz play or Garland play?


But you said Garland only played 4 games. So what are you basing this on?


Mike said I didn't watch, I was asking who didn't I watch?


Your whole observation on Garland is based on a 4 game sample?
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Mike@LG
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 10 Apr 2001
Posts: 65135
Location: Orange County, CA

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 11:24 am    Post subject:

Quote:
Mike said I didn't watch, I was asking who didn't I watch?


Garland beyond 4 games of an NCAA career.
_________________
Resident Car Nut.

https://lakersdraft.substack.com/

I am not an economic advisor nor do I advise economic strategies or plans.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
noahp45
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 6572
Location: Oceanside Ca

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 11:25 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
Mike@LG wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
#StayInYoLane wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
Garland is another Fultz in my OPINION, I wouldn't draft him.


What makes you say that?


Overhyped guy that will get drafted higher then what he rates.

Dude played 5 games last year, no I take that back 4 games.....wow


Methinks you didn't watch. But Ok.


Watch Fultz play or Garland play?


But you said Garland only played 4 games. So what are you basing this on?


Mike said I didn't watch, I was asking who didn't I watch?


Your whole observation on Garland is based on a 4 game sample?


Exactly he only played 4 games, people are saying he is worth a top 4 pick. His body of work is that of 4 games. In my eyes he is over hyped, how do I make an assessment of someone that only has 4 games as an example?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Mike@LG
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 10 Apr 2001
Posts: 65135
Location: Orange County, CA

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 11:26 am    Post subject:

noahp45 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
Mike@LG wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
#StayInYoLane wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
Garland is another Fultz in my OPINION, I wouldn't draft him.


What makes you say that?


Overhyped guy that will get drafted higher then what he rates.

Dude played 5 games last year, no I take that back 4 games.....wow


Methinks you didn't watch. But Ok.


Watch Fultz play or Garland play?


But you said Garland only played 4 games. So what are you basing this on?


Mike said I didn't watch, I was asking who didn't I watch?


Your whole observation on Garland is based on a 4 game sample?


Exactly he only played 4 games, people are saying he is worth a top 4 pick. His body of work is that of 4 games. In my eyes he is over hyped, how do I make an assessment of someone that only has 4 games as an example?


Was Kyrie overhyped because of 11 games?

But Kobe definitely was overhyped because 0 games.
_________________
Resident Car Nut.

https://lakersdraft.substack.com/

I am not an economic advisor nor do I advise economic strategies or plans.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 11:27 am    Post subject:

Side: how different is this thread from the "Official General 2019 NBA Draft Thread (NOR 1; MEM 2; NYC 3; LAL 4)" thread? My F5 isn't as strong as it used to be for multiple threads.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 11:28 am    Post subject:

Quote:
Exactly he only played 4 games, people are saying he is worth a top 4 pick. His body of work is that of 4 games. In my eyes he is over hyped, how do I make an assessment of someone that only has 4 games as an example?


I think scouts have the talent to look at his other body of work, and will scrutinize him in workouts. There have been other players who were either injured or playing overseas against less than ideal comp that were still scouted without a good amount of NCAA game level scrutiny.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
noahp45
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 6572
Location: Oceanside Ca

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 11:29 am    Post subject:

Mike@LG wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
Mike@LG wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
#StayInYoLane wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
Garland is another Fultz in my OPINION, I wouldn't draft him.


What makes you say that?


Overhyped guy that will get drafted higher then what he rates.

Dude played 5 games last year, no I take that back 4 games.....wow


Methinks you didn't watch. But Ok.


Watch Fultz play or Garland play?


But you said Garland only played 4 games. So what are you basing this on?


Mike said I didn't watch, I was asking who didn't I watch?


Your whole observation on Garland is based on a 4 game sample?


Exactly he only played 4 games, people are saying he is worth a top 4 pick. His body of work is that of 4 games. In my eyes he is over hyped, how do I make an assessment of someone that only has 4 games as an example?


Was Kyrie overhyped because of 11 games?

But Kobe definitely was overhyped because 0 games.


Kyrie was a Duke product and a super star. And he played more games than garland.

Also that draftclass was not as deep as this one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
VicXLakers
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 11823

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 11:31 am    Post subject:

?????????? giving up on Zo already?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
CamReddish
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2015
Posts: 7783

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 11:36 am    Post subject:

Mike@LG wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
Mike@LG wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
#StayInYoLane wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
Garland is another Fultz in my OPINION, I wouldn't draft him.


What makes you say that?


Overhyped guy that will get drafted higher then what he rates.

Dude played 5 games last year, no I take that back 4 games.....wow


Methinks you didn't watch. But Ok.


Watch Fultz play or Garland play?


But you said Garland only played 4 games. So what are you basing this on?


Mike said I didn't watch, I was asking who didn't I watch?


Your whole observation on Garland is based on a 4 game sample?


Exactly he only played 4 games, people are saying he is worth a top 4 pick. His body of work is that of 4 games. In my eyes he is over hyped, how do I make an assessment of someone that only has 4 games as an example?


Was Kyrie overhyped because of 11 games?

But Kobe definitely was overhyped because 0 games.


Cam Reddish 1st 5 games

FG 43.3% 3pt 42.5% FT 93.75% 2 apg 2.2 spg 16.8 ppg
_________________
Previously LBJ23
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KBandKB
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 11 Aug 2005
Posts: 2278

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 11:39 am    Post subject:

Darius Garland a no-show at the combine per SHAMS.

Quote:
Top prospect Darius Garland has left the NBA Draft Combine, fueling belief among some teams that he could have a promise in lottery, sources tell @TheAthleticNBA @Stadium.


Maybe SAS is right and the Knicks want Garland.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
noahp45
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 6572
Location: Oceanside Ca

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 11:40 am    Post subject:

Kobe obviously wasn't too overhyped since he was traded away for an old Vlade Divac
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Don Draper
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Posts: 28422
Location: LA --> Bay Area

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 11:42 am    Post subject:

Zo and Garland would fill completely different roles on this team. Garland could be your prototypical Steph/Dame/Kyrie PG while Zo could do what he did best at UCLA: be the off-ball guard extraordinaire.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
noahp45
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 6572
Location: Oceanside Ca

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 11:43 am    Post subject:

KBandKB wrote:
Darius Garland a no-show at the combine per SHAMS.

Quote:
Top prospect Darius Garland has left the NBA Draft Combine, fueling belief among some teams that he could have a promise in lottery, sources tell @TheAthleticNBA @Stadium.


Maybe SAS is right and the Knicks want Garland.


Great, Maybe someone will save the Lakers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
BigGameHames
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 May 2015
Posts: 7982

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 11:45 am    Post subject:

Don Draper wrote:
Zo and Garland would fill completely different roles on this team. Garland could be your prototypical Steph/Dame/Kyrie PG while Zo could do what he did best at UCLA: be the off-ball guard extraordinaire.


Yep. One of Zos best qualities is his ability to play with pretty much anybody. Either way, I don’t think who we draft starts so if we get Garland, we don’t need a backup PG and he helps scoring issues.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
activeverb
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 37470

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 11:46 am    Post subject: Re: 3 out of 5 Lottery Years and Lakers still looking for their PG of the Future

Nash Vegas wrote:
Next BPA slotted 4th will be another PG, Darius Garland. If we do draft him like most draft experts are saying, that’s 3 out of 5 lottery years we’re still looking for that PG of the future.



I'm not sure if we've been searching for "the point guard of the future." We've been searching for talent, any talent.

In this era of positionless basketball, I wouldn't get too worked up over the idea that Ball and Garland are both officially point guards. They have very different games, and I don't see why they couldn't play together if we do indeed keep the pick and draft Garland.

That's all assuming we keep the pick, draft Garland, and also keep Ball.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 11:49 am    Post subject:

noahp45 wrote:
KBandKB wrote:
Darius Garland a no-show at the combine per SHAMS.

Quote:
Top prospect Darius Garland has left the NBA Draft Combine, fueling belief among some teams that he could have a promise in lottery, sources tell @TheAthleticNBA @Stadium.


Maybe SAS is right and the Knicks want Garland.


Great, Maybe someone will save the Lakers


Maybe they have secret tapes of Garland playing.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
noahp45
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 6572
Location: Oceanside Ca

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 11:51 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
noahp45 wrote:
KBandKB wrote:
Darius Garland a no-show at the combine per SHAMS.

Quote:
Top prospect Darius Garland has left the NBA Draft Combine, fueling belief among some teams that he could have a promise in lottery, sources tell @TheAthleticNBA @Stadium.


Maybe SAS is right and the Knicks want Garland.


Great, Maybe someone will save the Lakers


Maybe they have secret tapes of Garland playing.


BRENTWOOD ACADEMY highlights?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KeepItRealOrElse
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 11 Oct 2012
Posts: 32767

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 1:10 pm    Post subject:

Culver measured very similar to Caris Levert. didn't measure well really.

- Levert a half inch taller probly once we see height w/o shoes

- Levert half inch in ws & reach

- Culver is +3 lbs being 194

6'6 3/4s below avg length for height
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KeepItRealOrElse
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 11 Oct 2012
Posts: 32767

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 1:12 pm    Post subject:

Ryan West said yesterday that now the hard work begins. and I think he was referring to workouts and interviews, the deeper evals. I doubt we promised Garland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
pio2u
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 26 Dec 2012
Posts: 54519

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 1:20 pm    Post subject:

FYI:
Darius Garland's dad is former NBA guard Winston Garland.


Last edited by pio2u on Sat May 18, 2019 1:37 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Runway8
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 19 Apr 2003
Posts: 22734
Location: La Jolla, San Diego

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 1:24 pm    Post subject:

noahp45 wrote:
Kobe obviously wasn't too overhyped since he was traded away for an old Vlade Divac


Wasn't old. Only 28, and at two cigarette packs a day at that time, he was entering his flopping prime. Jokes aside, he was a solid center. And if Shaq backs out, Lakers would have been without a center. It was deemed as a risk because the main goal was to clear salary for Shaq.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
pio2u
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 26 Dec 2012
Posts: 54519

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 1:28 pm    Post subject:

Zo and Garland would become a dynamic back court in a few years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Stumpy25
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 27 Oct 2016
Posts: 1314

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 1:35 pm    Post subject: Re: 3 out of 5 Lottery Years and Lakers still looking for their PG of the Future

Nash Vegas wrote:
Next BPA slotted 4th will be another PG, Darius Garland. If we do draft him like most draft experts are saying, that’s 3 out of 5 lottery years we’re still looking for that PG of the future.

2014: Randle

2015: D’angelo

2016: Ingram

2017: Lonzo

2019: Garland


I think if they draft Garland the search is over.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
panamaniac
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 28 May 2011
Posts: 11238
Location: PTY

PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2019 1:37 pm    Post subject:

Fracture wrote:
Dlo is an all star, they weren't wrong. It takes time. You trade Lonzo to draft another rookie PG, ya'll gonna still be whining because development doesn't happen over night.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 24, 25, 26 ... 47, 48, 49  Next
Page 25 of 49
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB