Grade the Lakers Offseason
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  

How do you grade the Lakers offseason?
A
47%
 47%  [ 70 ]
B
41%
 41%  [ 61 ]
C
10%
 10%  [ 16 ]
D
0%
 0%  [ 1 ]
F
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Total Votes : 148

Author Message
activeverb
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Posts: 37470

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 12:40 pm    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
Vancouver Fan wrote:
Short term gains is an A. Long term is a C. Therefore a B.


Yeah, it's always tough to grade two sort of distinct criteria.

But 2020 is an eternity away. Very much looking forward to this upcoming season.



Any grade is just a way of passing time until the season starts.

The "grades" will go up and down over the years depending on the performance of the guys we got, and the players and draft picks we drafted.

Getting worked up about the grades is like being worked up over a game of solitaire.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Hanging from Rafters
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 31 Jul 2018
Posts: 4449

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 12:40 pm    Post subject:

It’s ironic that Mitch and Jim got fired after they “learned” what had to be done and was replaced by Magic who did the same mistake...telling fans “it’s ok we’re gonna suck next year but just wait until year after next.” I just couldn’t do that again after doing it 5 years in a row.

It was time for the firings but conceptual they were on to something, if they had signed MozDeng to 3 year contracts or team option for 4th maybe, but they didn’t so it was time to let them go. Was good Magic quit also because he was only interested in the home run instead of building a team. It’s ok to swing for the fences but if you strike out 3/4 times in a row and don’t change
Tactics it’s failure.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Beir32
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 16 Feb 2016
Posts: 1710
Location: Western PA

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 12:46 pm    Post subject:

Sentient Meat wrote:
Beir32 wrote:
Sentient Meat wrote:
Beir32 wrote:

You should really consider adding this to your signature.


I don't think I am negative... I only say it out of consideration for other posters.

Some people wake up every morning and think the world is wonderful... ignoring the fact that three people own more wealth than the bottom 160 million Americans combined. They think it's fine that we've been at perpetual war for years... killing people daily... but choose not to put it on the news... they think that the Earth is doing amazing... and there is no need to do anything to protect our environment.

My point is that sure, no one likes to hear the truth... if you want to be socially acceptable you will just tell people what they want to hear if you want to be liked... but what good is a board where everyone says the exact same thing?

Maybe I'll try that for a week... just be a cheerleader.

You'll all laugh and say Thank God for a week vacation... but it still won't change the reality of the situation.

There's a reason why you only hear about why everything is okay other than a few random criminals on eyewitness news dragging us down from our collective amazingness.

It gets better ratings if you tell everyone we are doing great.

Yeah that's a nice speech and everything but it's disingenuous. You might get (bleep) on too much on this board by not being all sunshine and rainbows but we both know that you say plenty of things that get you criticized that are purely your own opinion.


Almost everything said here is our own opinion... and when I've been factually wrong as I was the other day... I say I'm sorry about it.

My opinion is a minority opinion... that's the main problem with it.

If all I did was make one sentence affirming posts most of you would think I'm doing great.

Exactly. Which is why I took exception to you saying…
Quote:
sure, no one likes to hear the truth...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
J.C. Smith
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 12676

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 12:52 pm    Post subject:

To me it's somewhere in the B+/A- range.

They gave up a lot for AD, but they got him. That acquisition helped them put what I think was the best offer for Kawhi out there, but his heart was elsewhere. I can't fault them for that. I'm glad they went all in. If they land Kawhi they created a superteam. It didn't work out that way but he was worth the risk.

The time that he strung them along could have been crippling but I think they did a decent job at filling out the roster, nonetheless. Cousins on a cheap deal is a steal. While they may have overpaid slightly for Green and KCP, they maintained cap flexibility with two year contracts. Avery Bradley was also a good pickup, as well as bringing back Javele. Cook, Daniels and Dudley may not be exciting additions, but they addressed the Lakers largest need: Shooting.

I know a lot of people here groaned and complained about bringing Rondo back on a two year deal, but he's on a cheap contract and he has shown time and time again that he can elevate his game in big moments. They got him to take less than he had in previous contracts, I personally think it was a good deal even if I'm not a huge fan of his game.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Sentient Meat
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 04 Jul 2014
Posts: 12978

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 1:16 pm    Post subject:

[quote="Beir32"]
Sentient Meat wrote:


Exactly. Which is why I took exception to you saying…
Quote:
sure, no one likes to hear the truth...


The truth and my opinion aren't mutually exclusive. Far from it in fact.

If you called out all the liberties taken with the positive crowd... of which the examples are way more abundant imo, I'd at least respect you trying to preserve the board's integrity.

If you only censure one person's or one point of view's posts... then it ceases to become an editor trying to keep the board's content from going astray... but someone only advocating for their own bias.

Start scolding the "positive" posters for some of their ridiculous Pollyanna takes and then maybe I think you care about my integrity vs. simply going after my point of view.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Beir32
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 16 Feb 2016
Posts: 1710
Location: Western PA

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 1:24 pm    Post subject:

[quote="Sentient Meat"]
Beir32 wrote:
Sentient Meat wrote:


Exactly. Which is why I took exception to you saying…
Quote:
sure, no one likes to hear the truth...


The truth and my opinion aren't mutually exclusive. Far from it in fact.

If you called out all the liberties taken with the positive crowd... of which the examples are way more abundant imo, I'd at least respect you trying to preserve the board's integrity.

If you only censure one person's or one point of view's posts... then it ceases to become an editor trying to keep the board's content from going astray... but someone only advocating for their own bias.

Start scolding the "positive" posters for some of their ridiculous Pollyanna takes and then maybe I think you care about my integrity vs. simply going after my point of view.

Ugh. This strawman again. I don't know why I bother with you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Aeneas Hunter
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jul 2005
Posts: 31763

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 1:30 pm    Post subject:

Hanging from Rafters wrote:
The plan was 2 max plus the young core...the Lakers didn’t event get two and the core. Had to use the young players to get the second and wiffed on the 3rd. With that in mind I feel a fan had to be unaware or intellectually irresponsible to fall short of goal yet still grade an A. Because of the signings and recovery I gave a C but understand those that may give a B. No A tho.


It depends on what you are grading.

If you are grading Magic's two max FA plan, it failed. When George signed with OKC, we had to punt to this summer. We didn't get a second max FA, and we had to burn our young core plus a load of draft rights to get Davis.

If you are grading just this summer, the criteria are different. I gave this offseason a B, but I would give a lower grade if we looked back to the beginning of the Magic-Pelinka regime.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Sentient Meat
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 04 Jul 2014
Posts: 12978

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 1:31 pm    Post subject:

[quote="Beir32"]
Sentient Meat wrote:
Beir32 wrote:
Sentient Meat wrote:


Exactly. Which is why I took exception to you saying…
Quote:
sure, no one likes to hear the truth...


The truth and my opinion aren't mutually exclusive. Far from it in fact.

If you called out all the liberties taken with the positive crowd... of which the examples are way more abundant imo, I'd at least respect you trying to preserve the board's integrity.

If you only censure one person's or one point of view's posts... then it ceases to become an editor trying to keep the board's content from going astray... but someone only advocating for their own bias.

Start scolding the "positive" posters for some of their ridiculous Pollyanna takes and then maybe I think you care about my integrity vs. simply going after my point of view.

Ugh. This strawman again. I don't know why I bother with you.


Where's the straw man?

You only attack one poster on a consistent basis.

Link me to all the "positive" posters that you chose to censure

I agreed with your point that we all were entitled to our opinion... I pointed out that you seemed to only go after one poster or one point of view.

If you show me where I'm wrong, I'll retract my statement.

I already admitted I've made mistakes and apologized for them.

This was a separate point... thus not a straw man.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 1:39 pm    Post subject:

Please don't "Dwight Howard" this thread. Can we move on?
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Boldarblood
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 296

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 1:48 pm    Post subject:

solid recovery, Im happy considering all circumstances.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Beir32
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 16 Feb 2016
Posts: 1710
Location: Western PA

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 1:49 pm    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
Please don't "Dwight Howard" this thread. Can we move on?

We need an "ignore" feature on this board.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
laker50
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Mar 2014
Posts: 2140

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 2:09 pm    Post subject:

Has to be an A.

Going from a surefire lottery team to a contender?
And getting two superstars.
And a good supporting cast.
Danny Green, AB, KCP, Cook. Good shooters and defenders.
Add in Demarcus and McGee.

Getting some great coaches. All experienced and respected.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
defense
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jan 2010
Posts: 39537

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 4:14 pm    Post subject:

Any offseason that puts us in title contention is an A to me

If you feel otherwise, me thinks you are a spoiled fan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ringfinger
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 4:18 pm    Post subject:

B.

Because it could have been better.

An A would suggest a perfect or near perfect offseason.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerLogic
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 27 Mar 2005
Posts: 17886

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 4:41 pm    Post subject:

B. They didn't do anything special. Failed on the 2 MAX plan. I guess it could have been worse.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ringfinger
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 4:42 pm    Post subject:

LakerLogic wrote:
B. They didn't do anything special. Failed on the 2 MAX plan. I guess it could have been worse.


Yup.

They course corrected welll.

But if you had to course correct you can’t get an A. From me anyway.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerLogic
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 27 Mar 2005
Posts: 17886

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 4:48 pm    Post subject:

ringfinger wrote:
LakerLogic wrote:
B. They didn't do anything special. Failed on the 2 MAX plan. I guess it could have been worse.


Yup.

They course corrected welll.

But if you had to course correct you can’t get an A. From me anyway.


It really can't be an A.

They traded young assets or let them walk to get the 2nd max with FA. No PG or KL. That was the primary plan and it failed.

I also think we overpaid on AD.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kwase
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Posts: 3069

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 6:44 pm    Post subject:

If we win the championship this season then it's a B. If not, it's a D. We gave our future away for AD and we could have got him straight up if we waited a year, and all Pelinka did was take what was left after Kawhi told us no.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Annihilator
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 02 Jul 2001
Posts: 4035

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 7:00 pm    Post subject:

kwase wrote:
If we win the championship this season then it's a B. If not, it's a D. We gave our future away for AD and we could have got him straight up if we waited a year, and all Pelinka did was take what was left after Kawhi told us no.
Winning a championship is a B???

There are 30 NBA teams. If teams took turns winning championships, the trophy would come to the Lakers once every 30 years. The Lakers have brought home so many championships, that some fans forget how rare it is for most teams to get one. To trade assets to get a championship this year is definitely an A.
_________________
“When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.”

--Anonymous
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 7:01 pm    Post subject:

kwase wrote:
If we win the championship this season then it's a B. If not, it's a D. We gave our future away for AD and we could have got him straight up if we waited a year, and all Pelinka did was take what was left after Kawhi told us no.


Good lord.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
defense
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 12 Jan 2010
Posts: 39537

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 7:09 pm    Post subject:

Laker fans in a nutshell

"If we win the championship it's a B"

If we 3 peat I'll raise it to a B+

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
HBLaker
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 02 Jul 2018
Posts: 281

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 7:29 pm    Post subject:

defense wrote:
Any offseason that puts us in title contention is an A to me

If you feel otherwise, me thinks you are a spoiled fan


This. Graded on a curve there is no other option than an A.....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LandsbergerRules
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 29 Aug 2004
Posts: 11197
Location: The Other Perspective

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 8:38 pm    Post subject:

kwase wrote:
If we win the championship this season then it's a B. If not, it's a D. We gave our future away for AD and we could have got him straight up if we waited a year, and all Pelinka did was take what was left after Kawhi told us no.


LOFL at winning a (bleep) ring being a B.

Playoffs=B
Get to The Finals=B+
Winning The Chip=A
Multiple Rings=A+
_________________
"Chick lived and breathed Lakers basketball…but he was also fair and objective and called every game the way it was played."
-from Chick: His Unpublished Memoirs and the Memories of Those Who Knew Him
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
toffee
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 02 Feb 2016
Posts: 114

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 8:45 pm    Post subject:

If we got Kyrie i would give us A+ and he's the only max player that i wanted next to Lebron and AD, i couldn't care less about Kawhi.

Even though we didn't get Kyrie, i'm giving us a solid A, we pretty much got all role players that we needed, plus despite all the haters, i love that Rondo and KCP are back.

AD: A+
Green: A
Boogie: A
KCP: A+
Rondo: A+
Dudley: B
Daniels: B
JaVale A
Bradley: A
Cook: A
Caruso: B
THT: B
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Beir32
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 16 Feb 2016
Posts: 1710
Location: Western PA

PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2019 8:53 pm    Post subject:

kwase wrote:
If we win the championship this season then it's a B. If not, it's a D. We gave our future away for AD and we could have got him straight up if we waited a year, and all Pelinka did was take what was left after Kawhi told us no.

Just like Paul George and Kawhi Leonard.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 3 of 7
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB