8 Guards/96 Guard Minutes
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
LaxT
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Sep 2002
Posts: 2536

PostPosted: Wed Aug 21, 2019 7:18 pm    Post subject:

Bard--Thank you.

Value of the DPE is close to nothing.
If the team wants to add a forward later, they need to cut somebody, or find a trade partner.

Dudley committed early, and after Kawhi's decision, Pelinka did not add a single forward among his contingent signings. I guess he made the signings with the assumption that Iggy will get bought out and sign here for the minimum. Instead the teams needs to use that spot for a center now.

If the team does not mind taking back a multi year contract, trading for a forward later might work with a team trying to shed salaries.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
24Legend007
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 05 May 2018
Posts: 1789

PostPosted: Wed Aug 21, 2019 8:10 pm    Post subject:

We maybe should cut someone and add Faried, Sefalosha, and Pachulia
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2019 5:11 am    Post subject:

We have too many one dimensional (and can only functionally defend only guards) guards at the expense of center sized bigs and bigger wing defenders. Something has to give, especially b/c with 8 guards vying for 96 minutes, a bunch won't play.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2019 5:11 am    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
Daniels is the most susceptible to being cut to make room for a backup center/Iggy (if he is waived).

Right now I would sign the backup center, and IF IGGY is released then consider cutting Daniels. He'll still get his full contract paid so he will be fine as he will collect double when he joins another team.


I would cut Cousins and keep a guy who can actually play.


Possibly. But as people pointed out, his 3.5m deal is a good salary ballast to include in a trade.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LaxT
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Sep 2002
Posts: 2536

PostPosted: Thu Aug 22, 2019 10:29 pm    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
Daniels is the most susceptible to being cut to make room for a backup center/Iggy (if he is waived).

Right now I would sign the backup center, and IF IGGY is released then consider cutting Daniels. He'll still get his full contract paid so he will be fine as he will collect double when he joins another team.


I would cut Cousins and keep a guy who can actually play.


Possibly. But as people pointed out, his 3.5m deal is a good salary ballast to include in a trade.


Counsins+Daniel can be traded for 9.8M. That could mean a forward at 2yr/20M. Or Counsins+KCP for 2yr/33M. There will be options as long as the team is willing to pay.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
laker50
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Mar 2014
Posts: 2140

PostPosted: Fri Aug 23, 2019 5:46 am    Post subject:

Yes, this team balance doesn't make a lot of sense.
Have 4 PGs and one center.
8 SGs and one SF.

Sure a lot of shooters.
But again not a lot of balance at CRITICAL positions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144462
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Fri Aug 23, 2019 8:42 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
Daniels is the most susceptible to being cut to make room for a backup center/Iggy (if he is waived).

Right now I would sign the backup center, and IF IGGY is released then consider cutting Daniels. He'll still get his full contract paid so he will be fine as he will collect double when he joins another team.


I would cut Cousins and keep a guy who can actually play.


Possibly. But as people pointed out, his 3.5m deal is a good salary ballast to include in a trade.


That obviously hasn't been a goal of this FO, they have given away potential salary ballast.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 6:37 am    Post subject:

This brings up my 8 guards, 96 minutes issues.

Bradley has averaged about 30mpg the past 2 seasons.
Green has averaged about 26mpg the past 2 seasons.

So pencil them in for say:

Bradley: 25mpg (23 mpg left at SG)
Green: 25mpg (23mpg left at SG)

That leaves 46 minutes for the other 6 players, and none are ideal at SF.

KCP played about 24mpg last season, but doubt he gets that much. But let's assume he takes about 20mpg. That leaves a whopping 3mpg left at SG (or the unpleasant thought of KCP playing SF minutes).

I do see Rondo playing (even if not ideal). He played 30mpg last year for the Lakers. No way he can do that. So even if he takes a hefty reduction in minutes to say 20mpg, that leaves 3 mpg left at PG.

We haven't even accounted for Caruso, Cook (Daniels/THT will play garbage of the garbage time).

You can siphon maybe 10-12mpg out of Green at SF. But still, that means Caruso/Cook are going to have a hard time finding minutes.

This roster construction is lopsided and will probably have to be remedied come 12/15.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Bard207
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 08 Jan 2013
Posts: 7713

PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 6:42 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
This brings up my 8 guards, 96 minutes issues.

Bradley has averaged about 30mpg the past 2 seasons.
Green has averaged about 26mpg the past 2 seasons.

So pencil them in for say:

Bradley: 25mpg (23 mpg left at SG)
Green: 25mpg (23mpg left at SG)

That leaves 46 minutes for the other 6 players, and none are ideal at SF.

KCP played about 24mpg last season, but doubt he gets that much. But let's assume he takes about 20mpg. That leaves a whopping 3mpg left at SG (or the unpleasant thought of KCP playing SF minutes).

I do see Rondo playing (even if not ideal). He played 30mpg last year for the Lakers. No way he can do that. So even if he takes a hefty reduction in minutes to say 20mpg, that leaves 3 mpg left at PG.

We haven't even accounted for Caruso, Cook (Daniels/THT will play garbage of the garbage time).

You can siphon maybe 10-12mpg out of Green at SF. But still, that means Caruso/Cook are going to have a hard time finding minutes.

This roster construction is lopsided and will probably have to be remedied come 12/15.



With Ingram and Ball gone and Green destined to play some SF with Kuzma aching, there won't be much of a size advantage at the two guard positions like there was last season.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 6:50 am    Post subject:

Yeah. Though I think LBJ plays a lion share of the "SF" minutes and Kuz will back some up too. I think the SF will be shared via LBJ/Green/Kuz/Dudley. Hopefully Iggy buyout will happen one day...#FREEIGGY.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
pio2u
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 26 Dec 2012
Posts: 54573

PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 8:33 am    Post subject:

Plenty of trade-package-fodder in that group if needed. js
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
wolfpaclaker
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 29 May 2002
Posts: 58336

PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 9:15 am    Post subject:

Bradley and KCP should start. They are the two most athletic and gifted players at those positions. Danny Green, Rondo should come off the bench as vets.

There will be moments for Caruso, Cook and even Daniels. They will need to step up and take them.

However I would guess our 4 man rotation is Bradley-KCP-Green-Rondo.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 9:22 am    Post subject:

wolfpaclaker wrote:
Bradley and KCP should start. They are the two most athletic and gifted players at those positions. Danny Green, Rondo should come off the bench as vets.

There will be moments for Caruso, Cook and even Daniels. They will need to step up and take them.

However I would guess our 4 man rotation is Bradley-KCP-Green-Rondo.


No way KCP should start over Green.

I like Green with LBJ/AD b/c he knows his role. KCP is too much of a gunner. We didn't drop 15m/year for him to be a bench guy.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
audioaxes
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 12573

PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 9:25 am    Post subject:

wolfpaclaker wrote:
Bradley and KCP should start. They are the two most athletic and gifted players at those positions. Danny Green, Rondo should come off the bench as vets.

There will be moments for Caruso, Cook and even Daniels. They will need to step up and take them.

However I would guess our 4 man rotation is Bradley-KCP-Green-Rondo.

the Lakers didnt pay Green 14mil to come off the bench. And his defense and shooting are clearly better than KCP. And you cant ignore his tendency to do stupid stuff on the court. I'd put Green, Bradley, Caruso, and maybe even Cook on the floor before KCP.
_________________
(bleep) Kawhi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
audioaxes
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 12573

PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 9:28 am    Post subject:

I think we should use are ridiculous guard depth to our advantage by playing them in shorter high energy bursts... have them go 100% full court press defense and send who ever is defending them on endless laps around the court running through screens and such.... we would tire out opposing team's back-courts who do have the depth to keep up.
_________________
(bleep) Kawhi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 9:47 am    Post subject:

Pencil Rondo in for that sweet spot of 18 mpg.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Bard207
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 08 Jan 2013
Posts: 7713

PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 9:47 am    Post subject:

audioaxes wrote:
I think we should use are ridiculous guard depth to our advantage by playing them in shorter high energy bursts... have them go 100% full court press defense and send who ever is defending them on endless laps around the court running through screens and such.... we would tire out opposing team's back-courts who do have the depth to keep up.



Will they be able to press effectively without help from the forwards and center?

Other than Davis and Kuzma, the rest of the front court players are on the older side and might not be into doing that much running on defense.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 9:56 am    Post subject:

epak wrote:
Pencil Rondo in for that sweet spot of 18 mpg.


Even at 18mpg, that means Cook/Caruso (let alone Daniels/THT) are getting minimal minutes.

That's problematic.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 10:01 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
epak wrote:
Pencil Rondo in for that sweet spot of 18 mpg.


Even at 18mpg, that means Cook/Caruso (let alone Daniels/THT) are getting minimal minutes.

That's problematic.


Injuries should take care of that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 10:05 am    Post subject:

epak wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
epak wrote:
Pencil Rondo in for that sweet spot of 18 mpg.


Even at 18mpg, that means Cook/Caruso (let alone Daniels/THT) are getting minimal minutes.

That's problematic.


Injuries should take care of that.

Are you volunteering to do that on behalf of Rajon "Tonya Harding" Rondo?
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
epak
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 30 Aug 2005
Posts: 34147

PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 10:18 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
epak wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
epak wrote:
Pencil Rondo in for that sweet spot of 18 mpg.


Even at 18mpg, that means Cook/Caruso (let alone Daniels/THT) are getting minimal minutes.

That's problematic.


Injuries should take care of that.

Are you volunteering to do that on behalf of Rajon "Tonya Harding" Rondo?


Yikes.
I wouldnt want injury on anyone.
But I feel like they happen. I'd be pleasantly surprised if AB plays over 65 games this year.

With Kuzma out for a bit, one of those smalls will take some backup SF minutes. And I'm hoping Lebron doesn't have to play over 32 mpg for the regular season.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 10:22 am    Post subject:

I think carrying about 6 guards is more ideal than 8. I think either via trade or waiver, we will thin that out to address big wing defense.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
dcarter4kobe
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Posts: 17674

PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 8:37 pm    Post subject:

McGee-22/Dwight-16/AD-10
AD-24/Kuz-16/LeBron-10
LeBron-24/Kuz-14/KCP-10
Green-28/KCP-12/Caruso-8
Bradley-28/Rondo-12/Caruso-8

That leaves Dudley/Daniels/Cook out of rotation.
_________________
"He's a Zen master, so he can speak to you, and he doesn't need a microphone; you can hear him in your head, 'Ron, don't shoot, don't shoot.' Whatever, pow, three. I love the Zen, though."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
PlantedTanks
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 01 Jul 2017
Posts: 3156

PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 9:43 pm    Post subject:

Given match ups I feel Caruso can fill in at SF. He has length, bulk, strength, athleticism and enough height to be effective in limited minutes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
PlantedTanks
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 01 Jul 2017
Posts: 3156

PostPosted: Fri Oct 04, 2019 9:46 pm    Post subject:

dcarter4kobe wrote:
McGee-22/Dwight-16/AD-10
AD-24/Kuz-16/LeBron-10
LeBron-24/Kuz-14/KCP-10
Green-28/KCP-12/Caruso-8
Bradley-28/Rondo-12/Caruso-8

That leaves Dudley/Daniels/Cook out of rotation.


I would hope Green and Bradley play 24 minutes to preserve them for the playoffs. Caruso and Rondo pick up +4 each.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB