| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Who's less horrible? |
| Sucky |
|
42% |
[ 9 ] |
| Smushy |
|
57% |
[ 12 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 21 |
|
| Author |
Message |
uberzev
Franchise Player
Joined: 25 Jan 2002
Posts: 19120
Location: SDSU
|
 Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 11:42 pm Post subject: Sucky last year or Smush this year? |
|
|
I do remember Chucky being clutch at times.
_________________
Lakers Gonna Lake |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mike_kb
Starting Rotation
Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 384
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Even Sucky didn't commit an unforced 8sec backcourt violation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CrimsonLaker
Star Player
Joined: 08 Feb 2006
Posts: 2268
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 11:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
chucky because chucky is a veteran, can shoot, gives effort, and looks like an egg head.
Smush sucks. Start Sasha...better defense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kenkoy
Star Player
Joined: 05 Aug 2003
Posts: 1746
Location: SoCal
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| None of the above. They should've signed Juan Dixon during the off-season. The 2007 plan is bogus anyway... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lakers1969
Star Player
Joined: 13 Jan 2006
Posts: 2197
Location: Temecula border of San Diego
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 11:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Even my 10 yr old daughter noticed the defense of Sasha than Smush. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NestT
Star Player
Joined: 05 Jul 2002
Posts: 4327
Location: The Shining City on a Hill
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Chucky is a matador 99% of the time
Smush is a matador 50% of the time.
I prefer Smush about a trillion times over. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KingKobeDubbz
Starting Rotation
Joined: 09 Jun 2005
Posts: 734
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 12:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Smush all the way. Do you guys even no what you are asking?????/I even read somewhere that someone said Chucky was clutch last year at times???????????????????????????You gotta be kidding me. Smush Parker all day. last year at this time we where sinking . At least now where a float. It may be one game a float but where still not wet. Also as I could remember Chucky would get seriously lit the hell up by any point guard in the league. At least Smush could contain most of the points. Brings drivng to the hole and lots of dunks. He also picked Nash like three times in a game. I mean seriously who in the hell even picks Steve Nash???????? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DancingBarry
Editor-in-Chief
Joined: 07 Sep 2001
Posts: 40202
Location: O.C.
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| How about a real starter instead of backups who should come off the bench? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sidious
Starting Rotation
Joined: 28 Apr 2005
Posts: 586
Location: Hunting Beach, CA
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Smush at least plays some defense at times. But does it really matter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tgf5
Franchise Player
Joined: 18 Jun 2005
Posts: 11581
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 12:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Chucky was actually clutch... Chucky is a better shooter, Smush has a better inside game, but that's not really much. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kqiu2210
Starting Rotation
Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 975
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 12:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Once upon a time...sometime during the start of the season, we thought Smush was the one that could consistently contribute and life the team.
But Smush still > Chucky x 2. Can u guys even imagine Sucky in the triangle? He has no IQ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NestT
Star Player
Joined: 05 Jul 2002
Posts: 4327
Location: The Shining City on a Hill
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2006 12:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| DancingBarry wrote: | | How about a real starter instead of backups who should come off the bench? |
How about a fantasy league? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
