Lacking a Killer Instinct
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Rhazz
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 13 Mar 2017
Posts: 672

PostPosted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 8:35 am    Post subject:

They chose locker room “chemistry” over actually good proven players. I put “chemistry” in quotes because that good cheer they’re so high on will dissipate quickly once the losses start piling up and they start slipping in the standings. 5-5 in the last ten games is a pretty good indicator of where we seem to be going. Teams seem to have figured them out. Decent teams at least. Barring a magical turn-around in team philosophy, and a jump in ability and game-sense in certain players, rest of the season will be rough.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Nash Vegas
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 01 Sep 2012
Posts: 7239

PostPosted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 8:45 am    Post subject:

LakersRGolden wrote:
There are Kobes and there are Shaqs. We seem to have 2 Shaqs.


Not a bad metaphor actually... ...
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
MJST
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 26309

PostPosted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 9:06 am    Post subject:

The team doesn't have a single dog on this roster.

There's a reason why LBJ needed a Kyrie and a Wade on the team with them, they had that mentality.

AD hasn't really shown to have that mentality, and LeBron's comes and goes, but it's better if he has someone on the team that's willing to have that mentality first.

But this team as it is, doesn't have that. They needed that third star, they needed the Kawhi or the Russell the piece that had a take over the game mentality and dog in them, Ingram had been showing it too but he was moved to get AD. But without THAT, the team lacks something that every other LeBron superteam that won a chip had.

This is why a lot lamented selling the barn for AD instead of going after him in free agency to try to add to what we had. Because LBJ and AD and a bunch of mid levels + Kuzma is likely not gonna get it done when the chips are down.

So they have a good record, but they're soft, and it shows whenever they get punched in the mouth. Just like Dallas a few years ago that seemed unbeatable, but when the Lakers punched them in the mouth, they folded. it wound up telling the story for their playoff prospects as well.

Then Dallas suffered again, when Wade did it to them and they fell short (refs or otherwise), but by the time Dirk faced Miami, he'd felt that pain twice and wasn't going to let it happen again and they had players on that team that had that grit in them when things got rough.

THIS team doesn't have that, and we don't have three failures to bank on. This is an all or nothing year.
_________________
How NBA 2K18 failed the All-Time Lakers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxMBYm3wwxk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
njeezy08
Rookie
Rookie


Joined: 25 Dec 2019
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 9:35 am    Post subject:

MJST wrote:
The team doesn't have a single dog on this roster.

There's a reason why LBJ needed a Kyrie and a Wade on the team with them, they had that mentality.

AD hasn't really shown to have that mentality, and LeBron's comes and goes, but it's better if he has someone on the team that's willing to have that mentality first.

But this team as it is, doesn't have that. They needed that third star, they needed the Kawhi or the Russell the piece that had a take over the game mentality and dog in them, Ingram had been showing it too but he was moved to get AD. But without THAT, the team lacks something that every other LeBron superteam that won a chip had.

This is why a lot lamented selling the barn for AD instead of going after him in free agency to try to add to what we had. Because LBJ and AD and a bunch of mid levels + Kuzma is likely not gonna get it done when the chips are down.

So they have a good record, but they're soft, and it shows whenever they get punched in the mouth. Just like Dallas a few years ago that seemed unbeatable, but when the Lakers punched them in the mouth, they folded. it wound up telling the story for their playoff prospects as well.

Then Dallas suffered again, when Wade did it to them and they fell short (refs or otherwise), but by the time Dirk faced Miami, he'd felt that pain twice and wasn't going to let it happen again and they had players on that team that had that grit in them when things got rough.

THIS team doesn't have that, and we don't have three failures to bank on. This is an all or nothing year.


Wtf has Kyrie done in this league before and after Bron? Honestly its crazy you would even put him and Wade in the same category. Besides that, Wade was a shell of his former self after the Mavs finals. He just was.. people seem to have forgotten that he wasn't but Flash was gone.

The closer for every Lebron team, has always been Lebron. Again, because you shoot the ball a lot DOES NOT MAKE YOU A CLOSER. Stop listening to media driven narratives
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lar9149
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 10 Jul 2010
Posts: 2367

PostPosted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 9:56 am    Post subject:

Rhazz wrote:
They chose locker room “chemistry” over actually good proven players. I put “chemistry” in quotes because that good cheer they’re so high on will dissipate quickly once the losses start piling up and they start slipping in the standings. 5-5 in the last ten games is a pretty good indicator of where we seem to be going. Teams seem to have figured them out. Decent teams at least. Barring a magical turn-around in team philosophy, and a jump in ability and game-sense in certain players, rest of the season will be rough.


It’s so hard to decide how important chemistry is.

Shaq said in an interview one time he didn’t believe much in off court chemistry.

I don’t know which is true?

I for one believe in chemistry off and on the court. The 2012 Lakers were an example of great talent and poor chemistry. But that maybe because in general we are believer in the human spirit over talent. But perhaps that is just good marketing. For example in one of the fast and furious movies Van Diesel was speaking to his enemy and his enemy was talking like he believed in talent while Diesel believed in family. In the end Van Diesel wins of course. But this is the ending everyone wants and believes in. It is hard to say if it’s realIty


It would be interesting to see as the Clippers went for talent over chemistry while the Lakers have good talent, they choose chemistry as more important (as chosen when they decided to keep Green and Kuzma over trading for Morris)

I still think in the long term especially playoffs chemistry wins. But we will see.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
MJST
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 26309

PostPosted: Fri Feb 07, 2020 10:01 am    Post subject:

njeezy08 wrote:
MJST wrote:
The team doesn't have a single dog on this roster.

There's a reason why LBJ needed a Kyrie and a Wade on the team with them, they had that mentality.

AD hasn't really shown to have that mentality, and LeBron's comes and goes, but it's better if he has someone on the team that's willing to have that mentality first.

But this team as it is, doesn't have that. They needed that third star, they needed the Kawhi or the Russell the piece that had a take over the game mentality and dog in them, Ingram had been showing it too but he was moved to get AD. But without THAT, the team lacks something that every other LeBron superteam that won a chip had.

This is why a lot lamented selling the barn for AD instead of going after him in free agency to try to add to what we had. Because LBJ and AD and a bunch of mid levels + Kuzma is likely not gonna get it done when the chips are down.

So they have a good record, but they're soft, and it shows whenever they get punched in the mouth. Just like Dallas a few years ago that seemed unbeatable, but when the Lakers punched them in the mouth, they folded. it wound up telling the story for their playoff prospects as well.

Then Dallas suffered again, when Wade did it to them and they fell short (refs or otherwise), but by the time Dirk faced Miami, he'd felt that pain twice and wasn't going to let it happen again and they had players on that team that had that grit in them when things got rough.

THIS team doesn't have that, and we don't have three failures to bank on. This is an all or nothing year.


Wtf has Kyrie done in this league before and after Bron? Honestly its crazy you would even put him and Wade in the same category.


Congrats on missing the point entirely.

Also Wade was a shell of his former self when LeBron got there?

You obviously never watched Wade the season prior when he averaged 27/6/5 and carried the Heat to the playoffs by himself in arguably an MVP level effort.

Or are you talking about the season LeBron got there where despite playing with two other stars Wade was still the team's leader and put up 25/6/4 on 50% from the field... that the "shell of his former self" Dwyane Wade you're referencing? There's a lot of players that would love for those numbers to be their "shell of their former selves" numbers.

But that's not the point of the post anyway, a point that you missed almost entirely. If you don't think Kyrie was a closer with a killer mentality.. then there's not much more to say.
_________________
How NBA 2K18 failed the All-Time Lakers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxMBYm3wwxk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakurluv
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 17 May 2010
Posts: 2529

PostPosted: Sun Feb 09, 2020 4:53 am    Post subject:

As phenomenal as LBJ is, he's always lacked the killer instinct, however it's not something that should stop a team from winning a championship!

If you're the better team, then that's just it in a nutshell! If you're not, well there you have it.

I've always felt wherever a team lacked in terms of leadership, tenacity, 'Killer Instinct', that it would be the Coaches job to step up in that area and impose his will to win onto his team at any given time...

We've had these type of coaches in our league and they still exist, however I don't feel that Vogel is that type of coach. He's good and done a good job with this team, but he's no Phil Jackson, Greg Popovich, or even Doc Rivers for that matter!

When your team lacks that type of 'Closer' you have to reinforce it in their style of play! Prior to Kawhi coming over to the Clippers, look how they played without a superstar. That had everything to do with Doc Rivers tenacity and 'Killer Instinct' as a coach. If and that's a big IF; LBJ and Davis are unable to reach this type of 'MAMBA MENTALITY' that's needed to win a championship, it's going to be tough. Someone has got to step it up!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
pio2u
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 26 Dec 2012
Posts: 54570

PostPosted: Sun Feb 09, 2020 5:48 am    Post subject:

Morris could have been our "Metta-Lite." We NEED a junkyard dog!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
wolfpaclaker
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 29 May 2002
Posts: 58336

PostPosted: Sun Feb 09, 2020 6:06 am    Post subject:

The Lakers have been through an emotional roller coaster and have had a comfortable lead a top of the West almost all season. You have to factor in how they were playing at season's start with regards to intensity on D.

The season is very long. Anyone seen former NBA players talk about this as the dog days of the season? Now add that Kobe Bean was a huge loss to the franchise and it's players. The emotional impact of that will take.

It will pick up again, their intensity and consistency. Killer instinct. They have it in them.

People talk about Morris as if he was some game changer. It was not like Metta at all. Metta led an average Houston team in the playoffs and was a major impact force in that series. He was the second best player on an EC powerhouse. Morris had zero impact for the Knicks, and he would have been a better role player for us than Kuzma in the short term. However you would have gained in one position and spot (backup 4, wing D) and lost in another (shooting at the 2, D at 2) with Danny Green going out. Not to mention that was overpaying for a role player whose bird rights you would not even have.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
Outspoken
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 11 Feb 2015
Posts: 8450

PostPosted: Sun Feb 09, 2020 7:18 am    Post subject:

epic_ wrote:
I disagree.
I think we are not tough enough mentally and physically!


I don't think we are tough enough neither; except Rondo. Physical is attached to their mental. They just wanna be cool with everyone. They don't want a player to look at them any type of negative way. They are the type to hit you to the ground and at some point, tell them "my bad." They don't have that dog in them where they couldn't care less about their opponents feelings. That is really why Kuz isn't that good nor consistent, because even though he is good in the post, mentally he doesn't feel comfortable backing someone down because he is too nice of a guy. He could shoot and hope that he makes it, and when his long shot isn't falling, he could get down on that elbow or block and back his player down. Draw a double, and pass it out to the open man. Do some work in the post, throw up your hand, demand the ball. Do some mid range work. He doesn't. He does that passive floater all the time. Don't get me wrong, it's good to have in your arsenal, and can be effective, Tony Parker made a career out of it, but Tony Parker was a small dude and Kuz isn't ans does it a lot to avoid contact, not because it is really effective or efficient.

Only Rondo has that consistent dog in him on this team. That is what separates the killers. That's why when people bag on Rondo, I don't because I understand what Rondo is capable of and that's why there is always a "playoff Rondo." He eases up in the regular season and then kicks it up a notch in the playoffs; like Bron and it is seeming like AD is going down that path as well, but rest a sure, Rondo is the only consistent dog on this team. He will do whatever to you and not think twice about it. If he knocks you down, slaps you in the face, elbows you, etc, he couldn't care less and won't ask if you are alright. Bron too, but a player have to really push him to that. He doesn't like nor want to be in that state of mind because his personality is of such a cool, passive dude. He doesn't separate basketball games and real life, he is the same in both. A player like Dame understands that in the game, it's nothing personal. He could turn it off, off of the court.

That is what this team lacks; mental toughness, that translate into physical toughness, outside of Rondo and a pushed Bron. I have seen a little bit in Dwight Howard this year.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Outspoken
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 11 Feb 2015
Posts: 8450

PostPosted: Sun Feb 09, 2020 7:41 am    Post subject:

Nash Vegas wrote:
LakersRGolden wrote:
There are Kobes and there are Shaqs. We seem to have 2 Shaqs.


Not a bad metaphor actually... ...


It is a bad metaphor, considering Shaq was a dog. Even though he used to joke and play around, in the game, he couldn't care less about his opponents feelings. Remember the story Kobe told at his statue ceremony; they played the spurs and Shaq told Kobe, give it to me early, David Robinson wasn't nice to me when I was younger. Shaq just wanted to punish him. He wanted to punish everyone that he went up against. That's where hack a Shaq came from. It wasn't because he couldn't shoot free throws as they do now, it's because they couldn't handle shaq down low.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
governator
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 25076

PostPosted: Sun Feb 09, 2020 8:07 am    Post subject:

hopefully we just coasting, bunch of 30+ vets... but Kuzma and Caruso should be balling
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakerican
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 09 May 2005
Posts: 3786

PostPosted: Sun Feb 09, 2020 8:42 am    Post subject:

LakersRGolden wrote:
There are Kobes and there are Shaqs. We seem to have 2 Shaqs.


There was only Kobe.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144461
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Sun Feb 09, 2020 9:18 am    Post subject:

LakersRGolden wrote:
There are Kobes and there are Shaqs. We seem to have 2 Shaqs.


I doubt that I’ve disagreed with anything more than this. We have no Shaqs.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakersRGolden
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 13 Jan 2002
Posts: 7922
Location: Lake Forest

PostPosted: Sun Feb 09, 2020 12:26 pm    Post subject:

venturalakersfan wrote:
LakersRGolden wrote:
There are Kobes and there are Shaqs. We seem to have 2 Shaqs.


I doubt that I’ve disagreed with anything more than this. We have no Shaqs.


It's always reassuring you're right when this is VLF's response.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Villain6Activated
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 22 Dec 2011
Posts: 6697

PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 1:55 pm    Post subject:

The answer is obviously Jared Dudley but no one wants to admit it.
_________________
“Life is too short. You have to keep it moving.” - Kobe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144461
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 5:53 pm    Post subject:

LakersRGolden wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
LakersRGolden wrote:
There are Kobes and there are Shaqs. We seem to have 2 Shaqs.


I doubt that I’ve disagreed with anything more than this. We have no Shaqs.


It's always reassuring you're right when this is VLF's response.


Did you even watch Shaq play? If so that is a ridiculous statement, one that others took exception to.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
GTL
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 29 Feb 2008
Posts: 9839

PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 5:59 pm    Post subject:

Are some of you actually implying Shaq wasn’t a dog? He posterized everyone he faced and dunked with a force that literally, LITERALLY broke NBA backboards.

How quickly some forget his dominance during our 3 peat.

There was nobody and nothing that could stop him.

We have no Shaq and there are and have not been any equals since.

Although Bynum came close........
......
.....
...
..

_________________
I miss you Kobe. I miss you Gigi.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Reply with quote
M2K
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 20 Feb 2011
Posts: 2432

PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 9:03 pm    Post subject:

ingle wrote:
Lebron and AD ain't closers, that's not their games and not their personalities.


Lebron and AD doesn't have that "dog in them" personalities. Lakers need a closer, someone who wants to punish their opponent in the 4th quarter, especially late in the 4th quarters.

Unfortunately, LAC has several of these type of players.

Lakers need to pick up 1-2 gritty players...starting with Dion Waiters.
_________________
A three headed monster... Jeannie, Pelinka, and Ham... another terrible season.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
hype
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 4372
Location: Lake Nacimiento

PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 10:52 pm    Post subject:

GTL wrote:
Are some of you actually implying Shaq wasn’t a dog? He posterized everyone he faced and dunked with a force that literally, LITERALLY broke NBA backboards.

How quickly some forget his dominance during our 3 peat.

There was nobody and nothing that could stop him.

We have no Shaq and there are and have not been any equals since.

Although Bynum came close........
......
.....
...
..


Yeah man, really making me question if any of these people agreeing to it even watched him as a Laker

He coasted for sure at times in the regular season but when things got serious towards the end of the season and into the Playoffs he was a ***** animal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
TheBlackMamba
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 9057

PostPosted: Mon Feb 10, 2020 10:59 pm    Post subject:

Agree that this latest stretch is highly concerning - Bron is starting to look his age and AD isn't as impactful on offense as he needs to be. But I also acknowledge it's a stretch in the season that's typically wonky and it's not uncommon to see a downgrade in play after teams come firing out of the gate like we did in October to December. These are the dull months of the season leading up to the ASB, after which hopefully we see the team returning to some semblance of their early season form. It's not an excuse, it's just the reality of an 82-game schedule that spans 7 months, leading up the games that actually matter and we need to be healthy/rested for.

So personally, I'm not gonna buy into this narrative that we don't have any closers until you know, they can't close something that actually means something in the postseason.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
vasashi17+
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 13 Dec 2019
Posts: 5611

PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 12:06 pm    Post subject:

Quote:
The Lakers are the only team in the NBA this season who have not lost a game when leading after three quarters:

1️⃣ Lakers 36-0 (1.000)
2️⃣ Bucks 41-1 (.976)
3️⃣ Heat 29-2 (.935)
4️⃣ Nuggets 31-3 (.912)
5️⃣ Magic 19-2 (.905)

https://mobile.twitter.com/statmuse/status/1227321657511096323


Maybe they got a bit of that instinct in em after all?
Haha
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ringfinger
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Posts: 29418

PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 12:11 pm    Post subject:

lar9149 wrote:
Rhazz wrote:
They chose locker room “chemistry” over actually good proven players. I put “chemistry” in quotes because that good cheer they’re so high on will dissipate quickly once the losses start piling up and they start slipping in the standings. 5-5 in the last ten games is a pretty good indicator of where we seem to be going. Teams seem to have figured them out. Decent teams at least. Barring a magical turn-around in team philosophy, and a jump in ability and game-sense in certain players, rest of the season will be rough.


It’s so hard to decide how important chemistry is.

Shaq said in an interview one time he didn’t believe much in off court chemistry.

I don’t know which is true?

I for one believe in chemistry off and on the court. The 2012 Lakers were an example of great talent and poor chemistry. But that maybe because in general we are believer in the human spirit over talent. But perhaps that is just good marketing. For example in one of the fast and furious movies Van Diesel was speaking to his enemy and his enemy was talking like he believed in talent while Diesel believed in family. In the end Van Diesel wins of course. But this is the ending everyone wants and believes in. It is hard to say if it’s realIty


It would be interesting to see as the Clippers went for talent over chemistry while the Lakers have good talent, they choose chemistry as more important (as chosen when they decided to keep Green and Kuzma over trading for Morris)

I still think in the long term especially playoffs chemistry wins. But we will see.


How important chemistry is, depends on your goal.

Short term? Not that much.

Long term? It is everything.
_________________
Clippers are our Daddy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kwase
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 21 Mar 2008
Posts: 3069

PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 12:47 pm    Post subject:

LakersRGolden wrote:
venturalakersfan wrote:
LakersRGolden wrote:
There are Kobes and there are Shaqs. We seem to have 2 Shaqs.


I doubt that I’ve disagreed with anything more than this. We have no Shaqs.


It's always reassuring you're right when this is VLF's response.




As much as it pains me, I have to agree with VLF. Shaq had fight in him and would take things personally to prove a point. He had some "nasty" in him. Nobody on this team equals that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
cencio_999
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 12 Nov 2019
Posts: 264

PostPosted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 12:54 pm    Post subject:

Chemistry is not only about laughing and fooling around togheter.

However my belief is that we are not talented enough as a team for winning while having fun.

We need to stay focused, angry and hungry if we want to win it all.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB