Do the Lakers win the 2004 Finals if Malone Didn't Get Hurt?
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 10:10 am    Post subject: Do the Lakers win the 2004 Finals if Malone Didn't Get Hurt?

Thoughts?

I've been re-watching Malone clips from that season and man was he good at his age/mileage. I know our depth wasn't the greatest being top heavy and with 2 older guys in Malone/GP, but could we have beaten the Pistons if Malone was healthy?
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
dcastillo
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 20 May 2009
Posts: 2172

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 10:51 am    Post subject:

I like to think we do. Idk after reading Phil’s book though you can see it probably just wasn’t meant to be. Plus 4 finals in 5 years is a lot. Takes a lot out of you and with all the drama those teams had it was draining.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
JUST-MING
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 43986

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 11:10 am    Post subject:

Who would you rather defend Rasheed Wallace; Karl Malone or Luke Walton and Slava Medvedenko?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ThePageDude
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 25 Jul 2002
Posts: 2573

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 11:28 am    Post subject:

Yes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ocho
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 24 May 2005
Posts: 53790

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 11:34 am    Post subject:

I dunno. That team had probably run its course. Would have been less of a blowout with Karl but I don’t think at 40 years old he would swing it back that much the other way. We had other problems.
_________________
14-5-3-12
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
TooMuchMajicBuss
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 17 Sep 2008
Posts: 21075
Location: In a white room, with black curtains near the station

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 11:47 am    Post subject:

I think we'd have kicked their butts.


Note: Biased AF
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ThePageDude
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 25 Jul 2002
Posts: 2573

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 11:54 am    Post subject:

TooMuchMajicBuss wrote:
I think we'd have kicked their butts.


Note: Biased AF


Correction:

Note: Pissed AF
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerSD
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 10 Nov 2016
Posts: 23778

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 11:55 am    Post subject:

I lean towards no. It’s awfully tough to rely on past their prime players and specifically being so top heavy too. Father Time tends to win.

Would be a shame to lose this season with LBJ performing the way he is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ThePageDude
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 25 Jul 2002
Posts: 2573

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 12:04 pm    Post subject:

We'd have won in 6 or 7. Watch what Malone was doing in the Western Conf finals and how many tiers above Medvedenko he was in overall play.
For those who think Malone was washed up, he was still very effective, much like Kareem was in 1988. But that's besides the point - the point is how was Malone relative to Medvedenko in both individual and team play and it's no comparison. Malone took a lot of the season to start fitting in and was finally really clicking in the playoffs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ocho
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 24 May 2005
Posts: 53790

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 12:49 pm    Post subject:

ThePageDude wrote:
We'd have won in 6 or 7. Watch what Malone was doing in the Western Conf finals and how many tiers above Medvedenko he was in overall play.
For those who think Malone was washed up, he was still very effective, much like Kareem was in 1988. But that's besides the point - the point is how was Malone relative to Medvedenko in both individual and team play and it's no comparison. Malone took a lot of the season to start fitting in and was finally really clicking in the playoffs.


It’s not to discount Karl. He was outstanding in those playoffs. His defensive assignments the first 3 rounds were Yao, Duncan, and Garnett. All in their primes. He was great and he would have made it a series. But we got demolished by Detroit. Our stars were a few weeks away from divorce. Malone was about to retire. Just don’t think it was our year. That Detroit team was really great.
_________________
14-5-3-12
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ThePageDude
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 25 Jul 2002
Posts: 2573

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 1:09 pm    Post subject:

ocho wrote:
ThePageDude wrote:
We'd have won in 6 or 7. Watch what Malone was doing in the Western Conf finals and how many tiers above Medvedenko he was in overall play.
For those who think Malone was washed up, he was still very effective, much like Kareem was in 1988. But that's besides the point - the point is how was Malone relative to Medvedenko in both individual and team play and it's no comparison. Malone took a lot of the season to start fitting in and was finally really clicking in the playoffs.


It’s not to discount Karl. He was outstanding in those playoffs. His defensive assignments the first 3 rounds were Yao, Duncan, and Garnett. All in their primes. He was great and he would have made it a series. But we got demolished by Detroit. Our stars were a few weeks away from divorce. Malone was about to retire. Just don’t think it was our year. That Detroit team was really great.


It's a good debate. My view is NBA teams are *really* really closely matched - where just a tiny difference things is the difference between victory and defeat. If we go by series record then Detroit looks like they're a full tier above us - I think that's really misleading, I think Malone's injury put us a tier below them. I think with Malone it would have been a series - and then it's a matter of belief who would have edged whom.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ReaListik
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Posts: 6553

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 1:16 pm    Post subject: Re: Do the Lakers win the 2004 Finals if Malone Didn't Get Hurt?

yinoma2001 wrote:
Thoughts?

I've been re-watching Malone clips from that season and man was he good at his age/mileage. I know our depth wasn't the greatest being top heavy and with 2 older guys in Malone/GP, but could we have beaten the Pistons if Malone was healthy?


Yes - if Malone, who up to that point had been an iron man in terms of health, had not gotten injured we would have beaten the Pistons.
_________________
"We are the goodest." - Shaq ESPN interview
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
x75274
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 03 Nov 2010
Posts: 674

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 1:52 pm    Post subject:

I lean heavily towards no and going into that series I thought like almost everyone, that LA was going to beat the snot out of Detroit especially after we had taken out SAS after being down 0-2 in the WCSF. Mailman was great/awesome in his role for us but he would have had raise his level to such an extent that far exceeded his role for us. Watching that series live and then hearing Kobe talking about the reasons why they lost to the Pistons, it was a fundamental issue of not being able to break the Pistons trap defense and score consistently and efficiently. Truth be told, I feel the Pistons had another gear they could reach that the Lakers could not because of their defense and the Lakers lack of preparation for dealing with the Pistons (with or without Malone). This is weird for me because the Lakers had just dealt with statistically the greatest Spurs version in term of their defense and beat the Spurs decisively, leaving no doubt who was the superior team.

I personally think the bigger what if is if you take the 2010 Lakers motivation and chemistry onto the 2011 Lakers version (especially you Pau Gasol excluding Andrew Bynum and keeping him at his 2011 level since he was better in 2011 than 2010) to go up against the 2011 Mavericks, who would win.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Steve007
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 13221

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 2:07 pm    Post subject:

dcastillo wrote:
I like to think we do. Idk after reading Phil’s book though you can see it probably just wasn’t meant to be. Plus 4 finals in 5 years is a lot. Takes a lot out of you and with all the drama those teams had it was draining.


Phil in his book said he thought the team didn’t take the Pistons seriously enough. I think with Malone it at least goes 6 games, which gets the series back to LA and the team would have taken the Pistons more seriously then being down 3-2.

Even listening to Kobe and Shaq years later, Kobe said they should have won and I got the feeling both he and Shaq still didn’t think much of Detroit.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Steve007
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 21 Jul 2006
Posts: 13221

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 2:11 pm    Post subject:

x75274 wrote:
I lean heavily towards no and going into that series I thought like almost everyone, that LA was going to beat the snot out of Detroit especially after we had taken out SAS after being down 0-2 in the WCSF. Mailman was great/awesome in his role for us but he would have had raise his level to such an extent that far exceeded his role for us. Watching that series live and then hearing Kobe talking about the reasons why they lost to the Pistons, it was a fundamental issue of not being able to break the Pistons trap defense and score consistently and efficiently. Truth be told, I feel the Pistons had another gear they could reach that the Lakers could not because of their defense and the Lakers lack of preparation for dealing with the Pistons (with or without Malone). This is weird for me because the Lakers had just dealt with statistically the greatest Spurs version in term of their defense and beat the Spurs decisively, leaving no doubt who was the superior team.

I personally think the bigger what if is if you take the 2010 Lakers motivation and chemistry onto the 2011 Lakers version (especially you Pau Gasol excluding Andrew Bynum and keeping him at his 2011 level since he was better in 2011 than 2010) to go up against the 2011 Mavericks, who would win.


I think the Spurs would have stomped us too if Malone was as banged up in that series as he was in the Finals. Slave Medvedenko playing against Tim Duncan. Need I say more?

Our team couldn’t defend the Pistons either. With Malone in there the defense/rebounding would be significantly better. Rasheed Wallace had it way too easy in that series.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Startrout
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 06 Aug 2004
Posts: 2143

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 2:22 pm    Post subject:

Yes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
x75274
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 03 Nov 2010
Posts: 674

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 2:23 pm    Post subject:

Steve007 wrote:
x75274 wrote:
I lean heavily towards no and going into that series I thought like almost everyone, that LA was going to beat the snot out of Detroit especially after we had taken out SAS after being down 0-2 in the WCSF. Mailman was great/awesome in his role for us but he would have had raise his level to such an extent that far exceeded his role for us. Watching that series live and then hearing Kobe talking about the reasons why they lost to the Pistons, it was a fundamental issue of not being able to break the Pistons trap defense and score consistently and efficiently. Truth be told, I feel the Pistons had another gear they could reach that the Lakers could not because of their defense and the Lakers lack of preparation for dealing with the Pistons (with or without Malone). This is weird for me because the Lakers had just dealt with statistically the greatest Spurs version in term of their defense and beat the Spurs decisively, leaving no doubt who was the superior team.

I personally think the bigger what if is if you take the 2010 Lakers motivation and chemistry onto the 2011 Lakers version (especially you Pau Gasol excluding Andrew Bynum and keeping him at his 2011 level since he was better in 2011 than 2010) to go up against the 2011 Mavericks, who would win.


I think the Spurs would have stomped us too if Malone was as banged up in that series as he was in the Finals. Slave Medvedenko playing against Tim Duncan. Need I say more?

Our team couldn’t defend the Pistons either. With Malone in there the defense/rebounding would be significantly better. Rasheed Wallace had it way too easy in that series.


There were a couple of weird things that happened.
1. R. Wallace even in game 1 showed an almost disregard and disrespect for Malone and gave off the attitude of 'I know I am better than you' something ironically Garnett and Duncan never did and those 2 are definitely better than Wallace. Was Malone truly banged up in Game 1 or did Wallace make him irrelevant? I'm not sure. It could be because Wallace in his Blazer days had taken out the last real chance for the Jazz to win the title in 1998-1999 and so he feels he is better than Malone, especially a 40 year old Malone.
2. If Malone could score like he did that one playoff game against the Rockets when he scored 30, we could have taken Game 4 and bought it back to LA for Game 6.
3. Personally I think even with Malone giving us that kind of vintage performance, game 6 is where it all ends for us that year unless Shaq goes off like he had been doing and Kobe finally wakes up and puts in a game 2 like performance.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Theseus
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 15 Dec 2007
Posts: 14166

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 2:26 pm    Post subject:

This is one of the storylines that gets ignored. Horace Grant was out too, so we had to go with our 3rd and 4th stringers. This meant they played 4 on 5.

Slava Medvedenko started game 5, and got 8 shots for 10 points and 5 boards.

If Malone is there he may actually have to be guarded, which means their defensive gameplan is stretched thin, and offensively they have a slightly more difficult time as there is a competent defender out there.

It would have been a more competitive series at least.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144461
Location: The Gold Coast

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 2:43 pm    Post subject:

Grant got worn down because of the minutes he had to play with Shaq and Malone missing games. As someone posted above, a 4th Finals in 5 seasons wears on a team.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Mamba81
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 19 Nov 2019
Posts: 2027

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 2:44 pm    Post subject:

No. The team was too old + locker room issues.
_________________
Kobe Forever
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Mamba81
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 19 Nov 2019
Posts: 2027

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 2:47 pm    Post subject:

Theseus wrote:
This is one of the storylines that gets ignored. Horace Grant was out too, so we had to go with our 3rd and 4th stringers. This meant they played 4 on 5.

Slava Medvedenko started game 5, and got 8 shots for 10 points and 5 boards.

If Malone is there he may actually have to be guarded, which means their defensive gameplan is stretched thin, and offensively they have a slightly more difficult time as there is a competent defender out there.

It would have been a more competitive series at least.


Truthfully we played the entire series 2 on 5.
_________________
Kobe Forever
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerLanny
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 24 Oct 2001
Posts: 47580

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:19 pm    Post subject:

Not with the refs fixing the series.

Let me know you see the next time a jump ball violation is called on the opening tip in a playoff game.

It happened in the first four games of the NBA Finals that year, all calls against the Lakers of course.

The series was fixed, flat out.
_________________
Love, Laker Lanny
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
GOODRICH25
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 17 Jun 2017
Posts: 3366

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:27 pm    Post subject:

Game 4, we are down 2-1, score is 46-49. With 7:30 to go in the 3rd, Medvedenko enters for Malone who finished his season there. Thats a series defining moment. Sheed scored 18 of his 26 pts rest of the game and we lose 88-80. I think if we win this, its anyones series as we would have 2 games in LA to fight this one home. Despite our on and off field struggles, Malone going down hurt us more
_________________
48 49 50 52 53 54 72 80 82
85 87 88 00 01 02 09 10 20

17 99 19 22 44 13 25 Mic.
52 33 32 42 34 8 24 16 23 3


Last edited by GOODRICH25 on Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:28 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ducasse
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 05 Sep 2002
Posts: 8140

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:28 pm    Post subject:

Malone was a difference maker. They could have won if Malone was healthy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakersAlldaWay
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 312

PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2020 6:39 pm    Post subject:

It would have been a longer series but a toss up on if we would have won. Always wished the Pacers would have pulled out the ECF. The Tayshaun block on Miller in Game 2 was a defining moment. Never been more wrong about how I felt going into a playoff series. I thought the title was in the bag. Ran into one of the greatest defensive teams of all time. So much happened that season unfortunately but hitting that low made the unimaginable highs in 2009 and 2010 that much sweeter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB