The MLE Is Goin To Either Sam Cassell Or Marcus Banks...Who Will It Be?

Now_I_Know

With websites reporting Banks coming here and Cassell saying he wouldn't mind coming to the Lakers (but wanting to stay in LA), it's pretty evident we will be seeing one of the two in a Laker uniform this coming season...I want Sam Cassell...I honestly think we're getting Marcus Banks though. Which do you guys believe we'll see signed to the Lakers this off-season?
_________________
http://ourworld.cs.com/DEEEEzzzz%20NuTz/lakerslkobej.bmp

Laker_Leo · Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 8:55 pm Post subject:

From all the options we have, Banks looks good enough for me.

KB8SD · Star Player Joined: 01 Nov 2005 Posts: 1385

If geting Sam I am means us being able to make the KG trade this summer then I want Sam I am sigend to the MLE for two years.

Also think about this Cassell only wants two years.Banks on the othe hand you can bet is going to want a long term 4 to 5 year contract just like Antonio Daniels last summer and that right there could be the deal breaker and would increase our chances of geting Sam Cassell.

Ziggy · Franchise Player Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 12722

To be honest, I don't really see Cassell being any better in the triangle then Payton was. Sam has a more reliable jumpshot, but that's about the only difference between he and Payton that year. He can't play much defense at this stage. He has the best blocking front court to cover for him on the Clippers. Sam is your prototypical ball dominant point guard. I actually think the Clippers are the perfect team for him. They need his leadership and decision making with the ball, and they have the right players to cover up his weaknesses.

That being said, I'll take Banks. Personally, I don't even think Banks is worth the full MLE. But if we have to use it on one of these 2 players, I'd use it on Banks rather than Cassell.

Charles · Star Player Joined: 22 Sep 2004 Posts: 4525

I hope for once the Lakers will commit to speed and defense at the 1 and youth with the MLE.

The team isn't winning soon without a blockbuser trade anyway. By the time the team matures enough, they'd need a young gun anyway to replace old man Cassell.

lakeshow03 · Star Player Joined: 19 Jul 2005 Posts: 3085

sam is just trying to get the clips to pay him.while cassels jumper and scoring would be nice,banks is the better long term choice

In the paint · Star Player Joined: 21 Aug 2004 Posts: 1371

I think Cassell is very unlikely and Banks is a reasonable possibility. However, I am not sure these are the only choices. It is more likely that we will find out after the draft. What if the Lakers pickup a good PG in the draft?

Charles · Star Player Joined: 22 Sep 2004 Posts: 4525

BygDaddy · Starting Rotation Joined: 19 Aug 2005 Posts: 556

given a choice between the 2 definitely Sam. He's a proven winner and is clutch. I don't see Banks as an improvement over Smush frankly.

LaLakers999 · Star Player Joined: 10 May 2006 Posts: 1103

banks is cool..... his numbers arnt impressive but i think he has court vision and really good defense... he'll thrive at the triangle

angel · Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 11:46 pm Post subject:

I would rather have Banks if it's going to take a little time. On the other hand, if KG was traded to L.A. and said he wants Sam, I would give him Sam.

_________________
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness. Only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate. Only love can do that." ~~Martin Luther King Jr.~~

rebirth · Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 12:16 am Post subject:

i think it all comes down to the "plan". If were gung ho on the plan then i say Cassell because he only wants two years.. which is what i think will happen. I prefer banks for his defensive skills and youth.. I'm tired of the old experienced injured vet approach.
_________________
“What is 17,505”
“Rest at the end not at the middle”

PassiontoWin · Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 12:27 am Post subject:

Hopefully Banks....

Bol · Star Player Joined: 24 Jun 2005 Posts: 4045

I like Cassell and certainly think he's a much better player than Banks, but it's time for the Lakers to stop donating their MLE to the elderly. Banks is a player who can grow with the team and contribute for years to come. Cassell would be a short term fix and the team would take a big step back after he retired. I'd go for Banks.

he_is_the_one · Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 5:56 am Post subject:

Really either one! I feel there both just as good, also they're both better than Smush!

Anyway, we'll be better in the long run with either.
Although Banks has an advantage because Cassell is one ugly mofo!!

_________________
That was Noiceeeee

limchrc · Franchise Player Joined: 29 Jun 2005 Posts: 11477

Banks... due to his age.

datniggbstyle · Star Player Joined: 11 Apr 2005 Posts: 1465

I have major concerns with both players. Marcus Banks is raw undeveloped talent with a passion for defense but he is young, inexperienced. Meaning that most likely we will have to deal with his pitfalls in the playoffs just like smush this season. He has to learn how to win with teammates in the triangle.

As far as Cassell he is a veteran guard something we need ALOT. however he is too much of a veteran, pushing 40 years of age. He couldl definately help but we need to use the MLE wisely this year.

I believe the happy medium of these players is Mike James. Incredible 3 point shooter, can defend solidly for stretches in games and is quick with the ball in his hands. He has Nba finals experience and could be the number 2 scorer we are looking for. I think he would be the ultimate fit for us at the PG spot. granted people tend to overract to comments by James he played lights out this season and i think he would be a great addition to the roster.

Now_I_Know · Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:13 am Post subject:

Now_I_Know · Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:15 am Post subject:

Now_I_Know · Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:21 am Post subject:

Ziggy · Franchise Player Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 12722

I actually think Banks would (or SHOULD) be willing to take a 2-year MLE with an option for a 3rd year. Banks' agent would probably try to negotiate that 3rd year as a player option, which is fine if he's willing to take a shorter contract. A contract longer than that would be a big risk, considering Banks hasn't even proven he's a full time starter yet (sorry, it takes more than a couple months to prove that).

Then if Banks exceeds expectations, he'd have the ability to negotiate a bigger contract sooner rather than later. I think that would work out for both sides. But for some reason I have a feeling Banks will sign a 4 year contract with an option on the 4th year.

Showtime_Returns · Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:27 am Post subject:

The smart choice and safe bet should be Banks. But seeing as how Mitch is our GM we will probably get Sam.

Now_I_Know · Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:28 am Post subject:

(Some of) these replies need to be merged in here VVV

http://forums.lakersground.net/viewtopic.php?p=584544&highlight=#584544
_________________
http://ourworld.cs.com/DEEEEzzzz%20NuTz/lakerslkobej.bmp

RedRider307 · Starting Rotation Joined: 28 Jun 2005 Posts: 180

Now_I_Know · Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 4:09 pm Post subject:

Cassell said he would take the MLE with the Lakers, correct?
_________________
http://ourworld.cs.com/DEEEEzzzz%20NuTz/lakerslkobej.bmp