WIZARDS -at- LAKERS -- 12/17 -- Thoughts and :-(( ratings
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> Thoughts and Ratings Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
wolfpaclaker
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 29 May 2002
Posts: 58336

PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 12:14 pm    Post subject:

Mike@LG wrote:
Quote:
Can't really be mad about the lost we were without Odom. Its difficult for any team to win without one of their 2 best players.


I could care less if Odom isn't playing due to injury. If a game is that close, and the Lakers have a shot to win, and didn't play well enough to actually earn it, especially defensively and still lost, I would be really ticked.

Well you have to realize that the players filling in for Lamar are offense only. Lamar by no means is an elite defender, but he's a good team defender and a solid man defender. There is just no way Lamar blows the amount of assignments, rotations and rebounding oppurtunities that Radmanovic, Cook and Walton do.

That's the whole problem with this team right now defensively. They need to play Turiaf at PF or just play through this (bleep) until Lamar comes back.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
- Sean -
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Apr 2002
Posts: 7339
Location: L.A.

PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 12:21 pm    Post subject:

Wolf - They were pretty weak defensively with Lamar. Now they are just worse. Even when you look at some of their good wins i.e. verse SA...they still gave up over 50% from the field. It's not like LO's return is going to automatically get this team where it needs to be defensively. Improved? Yes. But there is more to it than that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
wolfpaclaker
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 29 May 2002
Posts: 58336

PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 12:33 pm    Post subject:

Ofcourse that is true. They aren't perfect with Lamar, but there is BIG drop off in defense. Not just this season, I saw it last season too when we went into Charlotte and lost without him. We have Charlotte who averages 90 ppg .. 100+ in that loss.

With Lamar you have less oppurtunities for the opposing team because your defensive rebounding is better. You have some sort of rotation and speed at showing on the S&R. Odom would have matched up with Dallas' Nowitzki or Howard and I'm pretty sure that they don't go off for as much as they did. Last night, Odom would have been matched up with Jamison and he doesn't score with as much as ease as he did. Not to mentoin the S&R is just on a new low with Radmanovic/Cook being the guys that have to show .... neither is quick enough to show and then get back inside or just flat out switch on to the perimeter. When you have three players out there who just can not defend at all on a certain night (PG, SF and PF) it's going to hurt you far more than if you have just two.

I wouldn't say this team was "weak" defensively before these past few games, They were giving up 98 ppg at 45%. They had rebounding advantage, shotblocking advantage and were getting 7+ steals. Teams like SA shoot 50% but the Lakers were able to force tons of TO's. Part of forcing TO's as a team is again ... rotating quickly to play the passing lanes. To rotate quickly you need the speed and length and the guys out there right now just don't have it. Walton, Radman and Cook lack any sort of speed, length or defense.

Over the last 2 years the stats have this team being 110 ppg against without Odom. Maybe the stats are not really accurate assessment because of 04-05 season but the last 3 games ... Lakers have given up more than points than in any juncture of the season (3 consecutive games where they are scorched).

Lakers won't be losing these games with Lamar back. They're not perfect with him, but alot better than Rad/Cook at PF.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
magic_bryant
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 18179

PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 12:44 pm    Post subject:

Rad/Cook are your boys, wolf. Think we shouldn't have got more defensive help, now?

Ugly.

We need some D-first guys...badly.
_________________
Stephon Marbury on Kobe: "He's the only person on 'dis earth that can do 'dat. He guards people, like shuts 'em down. Then, to do 'dat on 'da offensive end. It's like 'Damn, I can't score on him AND he about to bust my ass."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number Reply with quote
wolfpaclaker
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 29 May 2002
Posts: 58336

PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 12:47 pm    Post subject:

magic_bryant wrote:
Rad/Cook are your boys, wolf. Think we shouldn't have got more defensive help, now?

Ugly.

We need some D-first guys...badly.

And once the playoffs roll around or Lamar is back, they'll be coming off the bench. At that point, the team has that balance of defense/offense.

Right now, there is way toooo many offensive players in the lineup. You can play one of the 3 with Kwame/LO in the frontcourt but not 2. Playing 2 is hurting the D bigtime. How can you really be upset about this? Many teams are alot weaker when their 2nd best player is out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
bluestorm1990
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Apr 2006
Posts: 5827

PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 12:50 pm    Post subject:

magic_bryant wrote:
Rad/Cook are your boys, wolf. Think we shouldn't have got more defensive help, now?

Ugly.

We need some D-first guys...badly.
Why doesn't Phil just play Turiaf then. Nobody helped defensivley nobody should be singled out , right next to Kobe they kept us in the game with their shooting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
- Sean -
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Apr 2002
Posts: 7339
Location: L.A.

PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 12:56 pm    Post subject:

Wolf - I'm not saying this team isn't better defensively w/ Lamar. I said as much in my first post to you. I'm aware that he'd be a better matchup for Dirk and Jamison than what LA had at their disposal.

I do think they are a weak defensive team w/ Lamar as well though.

The only teams giving up a higher % from the field are in the lottery.

Yeah they're 11th in steals w/ 7.7, but they also give up the most amount of steals in the league w/ 8.4. Yeah they are 7th in forcing turnovers, but they lead the league in turnovers committed.

As far as the rebounding advantage you speak of...are you aware of the only teams who they rebound better than for the season? Let me list them for you...Toronto, Charlotte, Atlanta, Golden State, Seattle,
Minnesota, Philadelphia, Memphis, Portland, and Milwaukee. All those teams are terrible.

Lamar is going to improve things for them across the board (including defensively)...but they need more than that to become a good defensive team. Personally, I think they have what it takes on the team to up their defense some....they just aren't putting forth the effort every night.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
magic_bryant
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 18179

PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 12:56 pm    Post subject:

Shooting and giving up score after score does nothing to help the team.

Turiaf isn't good enough to warrant minutes from Phil. Therefore, you have to get someone that is D-first but has an Offensive game to earn Phil's respect, so that they get minutes.

If the Rad/Cook at 4 thing doesn't change soon, this team will have to fight for the last playoff spot by the time LO gets back.
_________________
Stephon Marbury on Kobe: "He's the only person on 'dis earth that can do 'dat. He guards people, like shuts 'em down. Then, to do 'dat on 'da offensive end. It's like 'Damn, I can't score on him AND he about to bust my ass."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number Reply with quote
wolfpaclaker
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 29 May 2002
Posts: 58336

PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:01 pm    Post subject:

Sean - Ok I see your point, I agree. My only thing is that with 2 of Rad/Cook/Walton being out there along with no PG D that is what's really killing us. Once we get Lamar back and put forth a better effort, things will be better IMO. As you saw against SA, this team is capable of D. It's just about effort and to tell you the truth I question whether Jackson even cares as much about D.

Teams follow their coach. Jackson seems to care mostly about the Triangle in the regular season. My hopes are that by playoff time, Jackson being the genious he is figures out each team defensively too. That way the Lakers have a strategy offensively and defensively.

M_B - you are overreacting. Still 2-2 without LO and 1 road win to go with 1 home win. They should be able to go 3-3 on this road trip and then have Philly, Denver, Dallas, Orlando at home with the road games being Sacto, Memphis and Houston. That puts the Lakers through to a matchup against Miami at home and almost 5 weeks without Odom. I don't see why the Lakers can't win atleast .500 of their games until that point.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Reply with quote
magic_bryant
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 18179

PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 1:26 pm    Post subject:

Chi- Gordon/Hinrich, Nocioni/Deng will score at will on us and we won't get 30 team rebounds. Kwame has no great player to defend.

Minnesota- KG will eat us up and go for 25 and 15 just to let us know Bynum/LO isn't as good as he is. Add James/Davis' penetration.

NJ- Kidd/Carter/Jefferson. We barely win that matchup WITH LO. Just a bad matchup altogether for us. Again, Kwame has no matchup to defend, so it's 4-on-5 when he's out there.

Miami- Wade lives at the foul line, Haslem will score his 20, and Kwame has no one to defend. Again, another bad matchup.

Orlando- Dwight punks any and everyone. Kwame will be no different, because he doesn't have an athleticism advantage. Maybe Kobe steals this one.

Charlotte- See Orlando. Get out the KY, because Felton and Knight will LIVE in the lane.

Conclusion- We'll be lucky to be 2-4 on this trip.
_________________
Stephon Marbury on Kobe: "He's the only person on 'dis earth that can do 'dat. He guards people, like shuts 'em down. Then, to do 'dat on 'da offensive end. It's like 'Damn, I can't score on him AND he about to bust my ass."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number Reply with quote
Dr. Funkbot
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Sep 2001
Posts: 8188
Location: Eagle Rock

PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 2:28 pm    Post subject:

LakerLanny wrote:
LakersPimp wrote:
The lakers played well enough to win...but the wizards played a great game...they made their shots and free throws...im not disappointed at all. Lanny how could u say the lakers didnt try....they were down by 17 with like 5 minutes left in the game....


I am just calling it like I see it, but they looked like they were jogging around half speed out there for much of the game.

I don't even blame them really, it is ludicrous to play 82 games + playoffs and a pre-season. It is too much basketball on the body by 30 games at least. Thus, many nights you have guys jogging around and playing with half-hearted effort and intensity like last night.


I totally agree with you Lanny!- That is why some players are going to Europe- they are paying pretty good money over there now and they have to play only half as many games in the regular season.

The regular NBA season requires a VERY DEEP TEAM so that the Starters can rest up and be ready for the ridiculously long post season- since we have Mitch at the helm, our teams have been anything but deep.
_________________
R.I.P. Doc Buss
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Klone_dd
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 11 Mar 2002
Posts: 7330

PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 2:28 pm    Post subject:

^^ You're a mean one, Mr. Grinch.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
A Mad Chinaman
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Posts: 6139

PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 4:41 pm    Post subject:

Chi- Gordon/Hinrich, Nocioni/Deng will score at will on us and we won't get 30 team rebounds. Kwame has no great player to defend.
** Another take is the following: Kwame will be able to block out Wallace so that the Bulls will have less 2nd chances. Since the Bulls don't have any "lights-out" offensive players, the Lakers can win the game.

Minnesota- KG will eat us up and go for 25 and 15 just to let us know Bynum/LO isn't as good as he is. Add James/Davis' penetration.
** Another take is the following: James/Davis are not "quick" guards, hopefully players such as Smush/Sasha/Evans will able to guard them. KG is always a load, but they have no legimate center and with Cook/Vlad taking KG away from the paint - a chance to win the game

NJ- Kidd/Carter/Jefferson. We barely win that matchup WITH LO. Just a bad matchup altogether for us. Again, Kwame has no matchup to defend, so it's 4-on-5 when he's out there.

** Another take is the following: Maybe Smush/Jordan/Sasha can slow down Kidd and with the Nets not having many legimate front court players (C/PF), if they can control the tempo - they can win

Miami- Wade lives at the foul line, Haslem will score his 20, and Kwame has no one to defend. Again, another bad matchup.
** Another take is the following: Kwame will able to block out Zo and Haslem will not get his 20 - then its Kobe vs. DWade. Advantage Kobe

Orlando- Dwight punks any and everyone. Kwame will be no different, because he doesn't have an athleticism advantage. Maybe Kobe steals this one.
** Another take is the following: If Kwame can block out Howard, Lakers will have a chance.

Charlotte- See Orlando. Get out the KY, because Felton and Knight will LIVE in the lane.
** Another take is the following: The greatest danger here is that it is the last road game. The baromoter will be how the reserves play in this game. Jordan vs. Knight, Turiaff vs. Felton


Note: If the Wizzards are playing a "run&gun" offense where Arenas can take any shot and make them - any team will appear slow. The Lakers were a little slow, but with Arenas going off - it looked worse
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
magic_bryant
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 18179

PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 4:50 pm    Post subject:

If Kwame can't block out Brendan Haywood, I'd have serious reservations in saying he'll block out Ben Wallace or Dwight Howard.

I also have trouble suspecting that Kwame can find anything to even do on the court when he doesn't have an elite player to keep his attention. Honestly, does Kwame ever do anything when he's not playing Duncan, Yao, KG, or JO?

I have trouble expecting Davis/James to be slowed at all by Smush/Sasha/Evans. Expecting offense to win games is hardly reassuring, or did you not see last night's game? Think Cook/Radman wasn't stretching the D?

Wade will live at the foul line. And when he's not getting fouled, Radman/Cook will be sliding over to stop his penetration. Guess what happens then? Work horse, Haslem, gets the easy layup.

Hoping for 2-4 out of the next 6.
_________________
Stephon Marbury on Kobe: "He's the only person on 'dis earth that can do 'dat. He guards people, like shuts 'em down. Then, to do 'dat on 'da offensive end. It's like 'Damn, I can't score on him AND he about to bust my ass."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number Reply with quote
expertla
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 20 Sep 2004
Posts: 723

PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 7:53 pm    Post subject: Re: WIZARDS -at- LAKERS -- 12/17 -- Thoughts and :-(( ratings

DancingBarry wrote:
"I think once we had to start fouling to get back into the game, the referees thought that we were just going to foul the rest of the game because I have never seen a disparity like that in a free-throw situation," Phil said. "Sometimes it just gets contagious and we just couldn't get a stop on that."...


That was quite a disparity, but the fact is that the Wizards were just more aggresive. In fact I was very disappointed by the way the Lakers handled having Washington in the penalty early in 2 separate quarters. They did not even try to drive the lane to take advantage of it. I'm pretty sure that they were in the penalty as early as almost 3 or 4 minutes into one quarter. But they kept shooting jumpers. This just was not smart basketball and it accounted for the difference in free throw attempts and the game IMO. You simply must attack the basket in that type of situation or else you're giving away free points.

On the other hand its hard to blame Kobe for not attacking. He has to get fouled at least 3 times before they call one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakersSpirit
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 13 Apr 2001
Posts: 13619
Location: West Los Angeles

PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:57 pm    Post subject:

I thought something was wrong, at the beginning of the game. Sorry, to "point-the-finger", but I thought that Luke, in particular, looked too awkward, and not in sync... If you check it out, you'll see some early turnovers, and, relatively easy - missed shots, just from Luke. One, or two players, being out of sync, can knock the whole team out of sync.

One thing, that was very disturbing... I kept seeing loose balls, or lazy passes, going right past a group of Lakers, who didn't look very interested. Also, we didn't seem to be intense enough, on defense. Smush, in particular, continues to stand in a corner, with his hands in his pockets[in particular, after one of his missed shots]... I think that's why Phil took Smush out. We didn't seem to be using any anticipation, until late in the game. Phil has to focus on these defensive weaknesses... 1.) intensity; 2.) anticipation, and 3.) just plain court-awareness (at least look interested).

We seem to have finally come together, as a team, but it took a long time, and that gave the Wiz a lot of momentum. Arenas always seems to kill us. I remember, Gilbert was one of Chick's favorite prospects... I think Chick really wanted Arenas to come to the Lakers.

Phil's rotations may be a sign, that he wants to get everyone ready to play together[if this makes no sense, see some of my other posts..]. Kobe, also seemed to defer to others, in crunch time. It was, as if, Kobe was sending a message, to the team.
_________________
"Teamwork is a nebulous thing. It is as ephemeral as love, disappearing at the latest insult.".... Phil Jackson


Last edited by LakersSpirit on Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:23 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakersSpirit
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 13 Apr 2001
Posts: 13619
Location: West Los Angeles

PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:17 pm    Post subject:

Personally, I still think we can do much better, by using a certain combination of players, to give us energy, and I even think Phil sees the same thing... Phil, however, may want everyone to be ready to jump in, with whatever combination is out there...??

What I call the "energy-team", consists, at various times, of: 1.) Farmar; 2.) Sasha(yes, laugh, or throwup); 3.) Turiaf; 4.) Mo Evans; 5.) Kwame... I don't feel like this "energy team", off the bench, is getting enough time, on the court, together, to get really warmed up, and going. In the preseason, and when Kobe was out, the "energy-team" was being allowed to work together more, and it was working!! I think the "energy-team" can give us that spark, that we desparately need. Kobe, and Lamar, could be resting, and getting ready to close the game out. We need to use players wisely, then again, I'm no Phil Jackson...
_________________
"Teamwork is a nebulous thing. It is as ephemeral as love, disappearing at the latest insult.".... Phil Jackson


Last edited by LakersSpirit on Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:26 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
A Mad Chinaman
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Posts: 6139

PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:24 pm    Post subject:

If Kwame can't block out Brendan Haywood, I'd have serious reservations in saying he'll block out Ben Wallace or Dwight Howard. I also have trouble suspecting that Kwame can find anything to even do on the court when he doesn't have an elite player to keep his attention. Honestly, does Kwame ever do anything when he's not playing Duncan, Yao, KG, or JO?
** I believe that Wallace and Howard are elite and/or very good players that would get Kwame's attention - if not, it will get Bynum's attention who craves to play against top competition. Recognizing the Lakers' versatility and depth, they can tap into Turiaff to guard Wallace since there are many similarities between them.


I have trouble expecting Davis/James to be slowed at all by Smush/Sasha/Evans. Expecting offense to win games is hardly reassuring, or did you not see last night's game? Think Cook/Radman wasn't stretching the D?
** I think that Smush (if he can find his head) can make it difficult, Sasha will be the pest that he always is and Evans has the athletic ability/tenaciousness to stay with Davis and James. Did you not see them play against the Spurs?

Wade will live at the foul line. And when he's not getting fouled, Radman/Cook will be sliding over to stop his penetration. Guess what happens then? Work horse, Haslem, gets the easy layup.
** An old argument on the vast number of "in the proximity" fouls that DWade gets will arise during that game. If the refs call the game even on both sides of the court, they will be able to defend him. The game plan will probably to recognize that DWade will get his points, the goal is to eliminate the other players' contribution. If the Lakers are active, Haslem won't get many clean and uncontested shots - hence not score many points.

What is great is that if the Lakers play their game, they will at least win half the games on this road trip, if not - it will be another lesson that they will have to learn for their next road trip
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakersSpirit
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 13 Apr 2001
Posts: 13619
Location: West Los Angeles

PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 10:51 pm    Post subject:

magic_bryant wrote:
Kwame needs traded for anyon e that can a fill a need. I'd try to trade him for an upgrade at 1, 3, or 5. And I'm a Kwame jocker.

But dude is only useful against the Rockets and Spurs now.

Things that I was worried about before the season - shot-blocking, athletic defenders, needed help on the glass, etc - are really showing themselves. Which is why I find it so apalling that the team can be so damned content to watch the ending Ks walk for nothing, Cook getting a $3 million contract extension when you just signed Vlad for the MLE, extending Sasha, picking up Shammond over DeShawn Stevenson or even keeping Devin Green, etc.
Need to try and trade Cook+Shammond for an athletic defender at 1-3.



I can almost agree, with some things you say... However, I keep thinking of our presence, in the paint... Without Mihm, and now, Lamar, I think we need a really good defender, that will rebound, box out, and block shots, right under the basket. Drew, and Kwame don't seem to be enough, and the rest of our bigs are like tweeners. I keep thining of the the time, when Mutombo was available...
_________________
"Teamwork is a nebulous thing. It is as ephemeral as love, disappearing at the latest insult.".... Phil Jackson
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
magic_bryant
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 16 Oct 2002
Posts: 18179

PostPosted: Mon Dec 18, 2006 11:07 pm    Post subject:

LakersSpirit wrote:
magic_bryant wrote:
Kwame needs traded for anyon e that can a fill a need. I'd try to trade him for an upgrade at 1, 3, or 5. And I'm a Kwame jocker.

But dude is only useful against the Rockets and Spurs now.

Things that I was worried about before the season - shot-blocking, athletic defenders, needed help on the glass, etc - are really showing themselves. Which is why I find it so apalling that the team can be so damned content to watch the ending Ks walk for nothing, Cook getting a $3 million contract extension when you just signed Vlad for the MLE, extending Sasha, picking up Shammond over DeShawn Stevenson or even keeping Devin Green, etc.
Need to try and trade Cook+Shammond for an athletic defender at 1-3.



I can almost agree, with some things you say... However, I keep thinking of our presence, in the paint... Without Mihm, and now, Lamar, I think we need a really good defender, that will rebound, box out, and block shots, right under the basket. Drew, and Kwame don't seem to be enough, and the rest of our bigs are like tweeners. I keep thining of the the time, when Mutombo was available...


Or the time when Ratliff and Terry were available for Horry and Fisher.

Or Diop for $2 million.

etc.
_________________
Stephon Marbury on Kobe: "He's the only person on 'dis earth that can do 'dat. He guards people, like shuts 'em down. Then, to do 'dat on 'da offensive end. It's like 'Damn, I can't score on him AND he about to bust my ass."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number Reply with quote
angrypuppy
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 13 Apr 2001
Posts: 32752

PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 7:11 am    Post subject:

A Mad Chinaman wrote:
If Kwame can't block out Brendan Haywood, I'd have serious reservations in saying he'll block out Ben Wallace or Dwight Howard. I also have trouble suspecting that Kwame can find anything to even do on the court when he doesn't have an elite player to keep his attention. Honestly, does Kwame ever do anything when he's not playing Duncan, Yao, KG, or JO?
** I believe that Wallace and Howard are elite and/or very good players that would get Kwame's attention - if not, it will get Bynum's attention who craves to play against top competition. Recognizing the Lakers' versatility and depth, they can tap into Turiaff to guard Wallace since there are many similarities between them.


I have trouble expecting Davis/James to be slowed at all by Smush/Sasha/Evans. Expecting offense to win games is hardly reassuring, or did you not see last night's game? Think Cook/Radman wasn't stretching the D?
** I think that Smush (if he can find his head) can make it difficult, Sasha will be the pest that he always is and Evans has the athletic ability/tenaciousness to stay with Davis and James. Did you not see them play against the Spurs?

Wade will live at the foul line. And when he's not getting fouled, Radman/Cook will be sliding over to stop his penetration. Guess what happens then? Work horse, Haslem, gets the easy layup.
** An old argument on the vast number of "in the proximity" fouls that DWade gets will arise during that game. If the refs call the game even on both sides of the court, they will be able to defend him. The game plan will probably to recognize that DWade will get his points, the goal is to eliminate the other players' contribution. If the Lakers are active, Haslem won't get many clean and uncontested shots - hence not score many points.

What is great is that if the Lakers play their game, they will at least win half the games on this road trip, if not - it will be another lesson that they will have to learn for their next road trip




Kwame simply has to make himself relevant when he's not facing an elite player. When he's not challenged, he simply takes himself out of the game... with disastrous results.

The character of this team is being tested early. If they fancied themselves as a possible contender, they were going to have to improve their defense and rebounding as the regular season progressed. With Lamar out, that test came early, which is in many ways a blessing in disguise.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Texas_Pete
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 12823
Location: Somewhere watching a Laker game

PostPosted: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:36 am    Post subject:

LakersSpirit wrote:
magic_bryant wrote:
Kwame needs traded for anyon e that can a fill a need. I'd try to trade him for an upgrade at 1, 3, or 5. And I'm a Kwame jocker.

But dude is only useful against the Rockets and Spurs now.

Things that I was worried about before the season - shot-blocking, athletic defenders, needed help on the glass, etc - are really showing themselves. Which is why I find it so apalling that the team can be so damned content to watch the ending Ks walk for nothing, Cook getting a $3 million contract extension when you just signed Vlad for the MLE, extending Sasha, picking up Shammond over DeShawn Stevenson or even keeping Devin Green, etc.
Need to try and trade Cook+Shammond for an athletic defender at 1-3.



I can almost agree, with some things you say... However, I keep thinking of our presence, in the paint... Without Mihm, and now, Lamar, I think we need a really good defender, that will rebound, box out, and block shots, right under the basket. Drew, and Kwame don't seem to be enough, and the rest of our bigs are like tweeners. I keep thining of the the time, when Mutombo was available...


Shhhh!! I got blasted for suggesting a Mihm trade for Mutombo. You think LA could use his swatting? He like 3 against us in limited minutes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> Thoughts and Ratings All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB