| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
lionballer7
Star Player
Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 1684
|
 Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 11:52 am Post subject: Can we get Wilcox and Watson for brown and expiring k's? |
|
|
| Seattle is about to have a fire sale, maybe we can pry away Wilcox and Watson. They both have long K's. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LuxuryBrown
Franchise Player
Joined: 09 Jun 2006
Posts: 17429
Location: Mackadocious, Ca.
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why Watson when we have Smush and Farmar?
_________________
| Quote: | Smooth, but I move like an army / Bulletproof down in case brothas try to bomb me / Puttin' brothas to rest like Elliot Ness / Cuz I don't like stress
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
venturalakersfan
Retired Number
Joined: 14 Apr 2001
Posts: 144469
Location: The Gold Coast
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pass, there are better ways to ruin our salary flexibility.
_________________
RIP mom. 11-21-1933 to 6-14-2023. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
golakersgo121
Franchise Player
Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Posts: 11717
Location: 8 miles from Staples Center
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No to either Watson or Wilcox. And to give up Kwame?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hector the Pup
Retired Number
Joined: 25 Jul 2002
Posts: 35946
Location: L.A.
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wilcox?
Only if you feel that the team is too consistent as is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
