Thank you MALIK MONK
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 29, 30, 31  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
BILBJH
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jul 2020
Posts: 5105

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2022 10:38 am    Post subject:

anth2000 wrote:
defense wrote:
Please stop with the Jordan Poole comps

We are not the Warriors
Poole is way better than Monk


Exactly, who in the hell is comparing Monk to Poole? Lol....try, not even close.
Poole is a much much better player than Monk. No question.
I hope the Lakers can keep him but not holding my breath.


Is Poole a lockdown defender?

Because while you can say Poole is better than Monk... I don't think you can say he's much better than Monk... they are shooting at the exact same rate and I'm not sure Poole has Monk's athleticism.

Monk's assist turnover ratio is slightly better, rebounds a little better...

Where is this drastic difference that you guys see?

For 6 million, Monk is a steal and we should thank our lucky stars he's willing to stay for that price, if he actually does.

Monk vs. Poole
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
JUST-MING
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 43951

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2022 6:11 pm    Post subject:

If we bring back Malik, I will have a Jordan Poole agenda. I can't wait.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
CamReddish
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2015
Posts: 7783

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2022 6:59 pm    Post subject:

JUST-MING wrote:
If we bring back Malik, I will have a Jordan Poole agenda. I can't wait.


Nobody takes your stuff seriously
_________________
Previously LBJ23
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakersfan32
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 3601

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2022 7:36 pm    Post subject:

BILBJH wrote:
anth2000 wrote:
defense wrote:
Please stop with the Jordan Poole comps

We are not the Warriors
Poole is way better than Monk


Exactly, who in the hell is comparing Monk to Poole? Lol....try, not even close.
Poole is a much much better player than Monk. No question.
I hope the Lakers can keep him but not holding my breath.


Is Poole a lockdown defender?

Because while you can say Poole is better than Monk... I don't think you can say he's much better than Monk... they are shooting at the exact same rate and I'm not sure Poole has Monk's athleticism.

Monk's assist turnover ratio is slightly better, rebounds a little better...

Where is this drastic difference that you guys see?

For 6 million, Monk is a steal and we should thank our lucky stars he's willing to stay for that price, if he actually does.

Monk vs. Poole


poole -0.54 drpm, monk -2.35 drpm, lol

http://www.espn.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_/sort/DRPM/position/2
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerDYnasty72
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 4562

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2022 7:47 pm    Post subject:

BILBJH wrote:
anth2000 wrote:
defense wrote:
Please stop with the Jordan Poole comps

We are not the Warriors
Poole is way better than Monk


Exactly, who in the hell is comparing Monk to Poole? Lol....try, not even close.
Poole is a much much better player than Monk. No question.
I hope the Lakers can keep him but not holding my breath.


Is Poole a lockdown defender?

Because while you can say Poole is better than Monk... I don't think you can say he's much better than Monk... they are shooting at the exact same rate and I'm not sure Poole has Monk's athleticism.

Monk's assist turnover ratio is slightly better, rebounds a little better...

Where is this drastic difference that you guys see?

For 6 million, Monk is a steal and we should thank our lucky stars he's willing to stay for that price, if he actually does.

Monk vs. Poole


I appreciate Monk but damn Jordan Poole? The main advantage he gives us over Monk is defensive versatility. Monk can guard 1's exclusively, Poole can guard some 1's, 2's & 3's.

Can you say that about Monk given how similiar their numbers are?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
jonnybravo
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 21 Sep 2007
Posts: 30619

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:13 pm    Post subject:

LakerDYnasty72 wrote:
BILBJH wrote:
anth2000 wrote:
defense wrote:
Please stop with the Jordan Poole comps

We are not the Warriors
Poole is way better than Monk


Exactly, who in the hell is comparing Monk to Poole? Lol....try, not even close.
Poole is a much much better player than Monk. No question.
I hope the Lakers can keep him but not holding my breath.


Is Poole a lockdown defender?

Because while you can say Poole is better than Monk... I don't think you can say he's much better than Monk... they are shooting at the exact same rate and I'm not sure Poole has Monk's athleticism.

Monk's assist turnover ratio is slightly better, rebounds a little better...

Where is this drastic difference that you guys see?

For 6 million, Monk is a steal and we should thank our lucky stars he's willing to stay for that price, if he actually does.

Monk vs. Poole


I appreciate Monk but damn Jordan Poole? The main advantage he gives us over Monk is defensive versatility. Monk can guard 1's exclusively, Poole can guard some 1's, 2's & 3's.

Can you say that about Monk given how similiar their numbers are?


He's also their primary ball handler when Steph is out. That's a huge difference.
_________________
KOBE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
BILBJH
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jul 2020
Posts: 5105

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2022 9:00 pm    Post subject:

lakersfan32 wrote:
BILBJH wrote:
anth2000 wrote:
defense wrote:
Please stop with the Jordan Poole comps

We are not the Warriors
Poole is way better than Monk


Exactly, who in the hell is comparing Monk to Poole? Lol....try, not even close.
Poole is a much much better player than Monk. No question.
I hope the Lakers can keep him but not holding my breath.


Is Poole a lockdown defender?

Because while you can say Poole is better than Monk... I don't think you can say he's much better than Monk... they are shooting at the exact same rate and I'm not sure Poole has Monk's athleticism.

Monk's assist turnover ratio is slightly better, rebounds a little better...

Where is this drastic difference that you guys see?

For 6 million, Monk is a steal and we should thank our lucky stars he's willing to stay for that price, if he actually does.

Monk vs. Poole


poole -0.54 drpm, monk -2.35 drpm, lol

http://www.espn.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_/sort/DRPM/position/2


The Warriors had the second best defense in the league... if you put Monk on the Warriors and Poole on the Lakers you are likely to see those numbers somewhat inverted.

Again, I'm not even saying Monk is better than Poole.

I'm saying Monk is a huge steal for 6 million.

I can't believe I'm arguing with people who think Stanley Johnson will learn to shoot after 7 years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
governator
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 24996

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2022 6:18 am    Post subject:

Nunn - Monk - THT - Reaves - Christie

Lotta guard but he’s BPA for taxMLE I think, just secure him then go get the big wings and bigs

Unless y’all think Oladipo is a better get

Wouldn’t mind bringing back T.Bryant with the tMLE either


Quote:
Early indications are Tyler Herro’s extension with Miami will settle around $25 million in average annual value. Victor Oladipo is not expected to return to the Heat and is said to have interest from Washington, Denver and Detroit, in the salary range of the taxpayer MLE. – via Jake Fischer @ Bleacher Report


Last edited by governator on Wed Jun 29, 2022 6:49 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LakerDYnasty72
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 4562

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2022 6:43 am    Post subject:

BILBJH wrote:
lakersfan32 wrote:
BILBJH wrote:
anth2000 wrote:
defense wrote:
Please stop with the Jordan Poole comps

We are not the Warriors
Poole is way better than Monk


Exactly, who in the hell is comparing Monk to Poole? Lol....try, not even close.
Poole is a much much better player than Monk. No question.
I hope the Lakers can keep him but not holding my breath.


Is Poole a lockdown defender?

Because while you can say Poole is better than Monk... I don't think you can say he's much better than Monk... they are shooting at the exact same rate and I'm not sure Poole has Monk's athleticism.

Monk's assist turnover ratio is slightly better, rebounds a little better...

Where is this drastic difference that you guys see?

For 6 million, Monk is a steal and we should thank our lucky stars he's willing to stay for that price, if he actually does.

Monk vs. Poole


poole -0.54 drpm, monk -2.35 drpm, lol

http://www.espn.com/nba/statistics/rpm/_/sort/DRPM/position/2


The Warriors had the second best defense in the league... if you put Monk on the Warriors and Poole on the Lakers you are likely to see those numbers somewhat inverted.

Again, I'm not even saying Monk is better than Poole.

I'm saying Monk is a huge steal for 6 million.

I can't believe I'm arguing with people who think Stanley Johnson will learn to shoot after 7 years.


There's no debate if that's all you were saying.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Halflife
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Posts: 16656

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:16 am    Post subject:

last night on Spectrum and yesterday on Radio both said they THINK (being the key word) that Monk and lakers will part ways due to a difference in money.
_________________
Kobe.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/Clw9scopegx/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
danzag
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 28 Apr 2013
Posts: 22244
Location: Brazil

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:26 am    Post subject:

I like Monk but I think we'll let him go. We need size and defense
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:40 am    Post subject:

He was one of our bright spots last year. Will be sad to see him go but it's understandable as the Lakers simply have too many other gaping holes. Wish we could keep him but big wing/stretch center is important too.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Megaton
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 18 Feb 2015
Posts: 25624

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2022 10:00 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
He was one of our bright spots last year. Will be sad to see him go but it's understandable as the Lakers simply have too many other gaping holes. Wish we could keep him but big wing/stretch center is important too.


If our summer league roster is any indication, there is still a good chance Lakers resign him as the organization continues to be allergic to athletic wings/Centers.
_________________
Darvin Scam: https://media.tenor.com/images/3c15249955860a4b16b59e8ae035fb75/tenor.gif
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
MJST
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 26085

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2022 10:20 am    Post subject:

The key to signing people like Monk was to hope they had exactly the kind of year he did and then re-signing them. That's the entire point. To not re-sign him defeats the whole purpose of why we signed him initially in the first place.
_________________
How NBA 2K18 failed the All-Time Lakers:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxMBYm3wwxk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2022 10:24 am    Post subject:

The key with Monk here is if he makes the crazy (but Clips do this all the time) move to stay on the Lakers with a slight non-bird rights raise, and then the Lakers have his Early Bird rights in 2023. But that would be such a gamble for Monk that is unreasonable.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
BILBJH
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jul 2020
Posts: 5105

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2022 10:24 am    Post subject:

Same people disrespecting Monk are probably the same ones who said Brandon Ingram would never average 20 points a game.

Oh well, if the Spectrum report is true... we weren't getting him anyway.

I like the idea of Mo Bamba also, but Nunn better be healthy or this will not be a net gain offensively.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2022 10:27 am    Post subject:

BILBJH wrote:
Same people disrespecting Monk are probably the same ones who said Brandon Ingram would never average 20 points a game.

Oh well, if the Spectrum report is true... we weren't getting him anyway.

I like the idea of Mo Bamba also, but Nunn better be healthy or this will not be a net gain offensively.


People really thought BI wouldn't score 20PPG?
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Laker's Fan
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 27 Jun 2002
Posts: 12812

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2022 10:29 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
The key with Monk here is if he makes the crazy (but Clips do this all the time) move to stay on the Lakers with a slight non-bird rights raise, and then the Lakers have his Early Bird rights in 2023. But that would be such a gamble for Monk that is unreasonable.


I would trust Ballmer to make good on a wink-wink deal. Not sure I would feel as confident in Jeanie/Pelinka, unless maybe I was Klutch (and is that even still true).
_________________
Austin Reaves keeps his game tight, like Kobe Bryant on game night.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
BILBJH
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jul 2020
Posts: 5105

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2022 10:33 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
BILBJH wrote:
Same people disrespecting Monk are probably the same ones who said Brandon Ingram would never average 20 points a game.

Oh well, if the Spectrum report is true... we weren't getting him anyway.

I like the idea of Mo Bamba also, but Nunn better be healthy or this will not be a net gain offensively.


People really thought BI wouldn't score 20PPG?


Repeatedly

It's incredible that a lot of regulars argued like hell to defend the offer to pay Dennis 84 million but think Monk is a liability at 6 million.

(I'm not saying this just to you because it was many people here) but it's just frustrating that they don't appreciate Monk's talent.

If we were offering Dennis money to Monk... then sure, I can see some reason for debate... but at 6 million?

Just really super frustrating.

And I like the Mo Bamba idea... but Malik really showed me something and I'm going to be pissed if he goes up another level somewhere else next year.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ThePageDude
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 25 Jul 2002
Posts: 2563

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2022 10:38 am    Post subject:

BILBJH wrote:

<snip>
It's incredible that a lot of regulars argued like hell to defend the offer to pay Dennis 84 million but think Monk is a liability at 6 million.


Really? Monk is absolutely worth $6 million.
However that's not even the interesting question, the only relevant/interesting question is given that we only have 1 tpmle are there any *other* players worth spending it on? E.g. if both Mo Bamba and Monk are interested do you pick Bamba or Monk?

P.S. I really doubt Bamba would be available - many other teams can/will offer the tpmle, some may offer more.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
BILBJH
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jul 2020
Posts: 5105

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2022 10:42 am    Post subject:

ThePageDude wrote:
BILBJH wrote:

<snip>
It's incredible that a lot of regulars argued like hell to defend the offer to pay Dennis 84 million but think Monk is a liability at 6 million.


Really? Monk is absolutely worth $6 million.
However that's not even the relevant question, the only relevant/interesting question is given that we only have 1 tpmle are there any players worth spending it on? E.g. if both Mo Bamba and Monk are interested do you pick Bamba or Monk?


If Nunn is completely healthy... I can understand that choice.

But I really think Malik showed a higher level... so it wouldn't be an easy call for me. It all depends on whether you think Malik has hit his ceiling or not... but he is scoring with elite efficiency... over 60% TS which is getting close to Steph like numbers. If the article was BS that Malik wanted to stay for less... then it makes sense to go for Mo.

But if Malik really did want to stay like Alex did... then I think we might regret that choice.

But I do see the benefits of Mo because he is a unicorn in terms of his length.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
ThePageDude
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 25 Jul 2002
Posts: 2563

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2022 10:44 am    Post subject:

BILBJH wrote:


If Nunn is completely healthy... I can understand that choice.

But I really think Malik showed a higher level... so it wouldn't be an easy call for me. It all depends on whether you think Malik has hit his ceiling or not... but he is scoring with elite efficiency... over 60% TS which is getting close to Steph like numbers. If the article was BS that Malik wanted to stay for less... then it makes sense to go for Mo.

But if Malik really did want to stay like Alex did... then I think we might regret that choice.

But I do see the benefits of Mo because he is a unicorn in terms of his length.


I agree it's not an easy choice. It really boils down to whether one prioritizes defense vs offense and whether Monk can/will get starter minutes. (Bamba definitely will get starter minutes).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
yinoma2001
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Posts: 119487

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2022 10:55 am    Post subject:

BILBJH wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
BILBJH wrote:
Same people disrespecting Monk are probably the same ones who said Brandon Ingram would never average 20 points a game.

Oh well, if the Spectrum report is true... we weren't getting him anyway.

I like the idea of Mo Bamba also, but Nunn better be healthy or this will not be a net gain offensively.


People really thought BI wouldn't score 20PPG?


Repeatedly

It's incredible that a lot of regulars argued like hell to defend the offer to pay Dennis 84 million but think Monk is a liability at 6 million.

(I'm not saying this just to you because it was many people here) but it's just frustrating that they don't appreciate Monk's talent.

If we were offering Dennis money to Monk... then sure, I can see some reason for debate... but at 6 million?

Just really super frustrating.

And I like the Mo Bamba idea... but Malik really showed me something and I'm going to be pissed if he goes up another level somewhere else next year.


I think you are conflating a few issues here.

Dennis would have been an overpay (and even I said that). But we would have not traded for Russ, and possibly kept KCP/Kuz/1st and Caruso.

Monk's value has no relation to Dennis, as Dennis was coming off a 6MOY 2nd place finish the year prior, and was established. Monk on this team, would be a luxury to have but we would be using our only free agent tool (MMLE) to do so, and we'd have a glut of guards IMO unless we offloaded Russ.
_________________
From 2-10 to the Western Conference Finals
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
governator
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 24996

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2022 10:56 am    Post subject:

Schroeder $84m ain’t got Westbrook’s $47.1m on the team, what are we comparing here, the $6m is the only weapon we got left for FAs
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
BILBJH
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Jul 2020
Posts: 5105

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2022 11:30 am    Post subject:

yinoma2001 wrote:
BILBJH wrote:
yinoma2001 wrote:
BILBJH wrote:
Same people disrespecting Monk are probably the same ones who said Brandon Ingram would never average 20 points a game.

Oh well, if the Spectrum report is true... we weren't getting him anyway.

I like the idea of Mo Bamba also, but Nunn better be healthy or this will not be a net gain offensively.


People really thought BI wouldn't score 20PPG?


Repeatedly

It's incredible that a lot of regulars argued like hell to defend the offer to pay Dennis 84 million but think Monk is a liability at 6 million.

(I'm not saying this just to you because it was many people here) but it's just frustrating that they don't appreciate Monk's talent.

If we were offering Dennis money to Monk... then sure, I can see some reason for debate... but at 6 million?

Just really super frustrating.

And I like the Mo Bamba idea... but Malik really showed me something and I'm going to be pissed if he goes up another level somewhere else next year.


I think you are conflating a few issues here.

Dennis would have been an overpay (and even I said that). But we would have not traded for Russ, and possibly kept KCP/Kuz/1st and Caruso.

Monk's value has no relation to Dennis, as Dennis was coming off a 6MOY 2nd place finish the year prior, and was established. Monk on this team, would be a luxury to have but we would be using our only free agent tool (MMLE) to do so, and we'd have a glut of guards IMO unless we offloaded Russ.


I'm not conflating anything.

Some of the people who managed to contort logic into every conceivable direction to justify signing Dennis for 84 million... are also saying that... Monk is too small so he's not worth signing for 6 million.

I said we'd have a hard time moving Dennis at 84 million... considering Houston just let him go... my theory seems to have been true.

I said that we'd be lucky to sign Monk for 6 million... even if we found out his fit wasn't perfect... we'd have a valuable asset to use to perhaps get a wing for the playoffs.

It's all about value... and Monk is one of the best values.

IF Nunn is 100% and you can get Mo Bamba for 6... then I understand that move... but if Nunn isn't... it is a huge loss to lose Malik.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 29, 30, 31  Next
Page 30 of 31
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB