Lakers Offseason Outlook
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
pio2u
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 26 Dec 2012
Posts: 54688

PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2016 3:39 pm    Post subject: Lakers Offseason Outlook

We are at a crossroads but the Lakers are finally trending upward.
Here's a look at possibilities that the off-season may bring.

Offseason Outlook: Los Angeles Lakers

Quote:
The Lakers are coming off a 17-65 season, the worst in their 68-year history. After being one of the league’s elite teams for decades, L.A. has strung together three consecutive last-place finishes. With a fan base and a front office that is used to winning, there is a lot of pressure throughout the organization for an immediate turnaround.


http://www.hoopsrumors.com/2016/05/offseason-outlook-los-angeles-lakers-3.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
kikanga
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 29414
Location: La La Land

PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2016 11:56 pm    Post subject:

ESPN torching us in their future power rankings.

http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/15700437/nba-future-power-rankings-team-ratings-players-management-money-market-draft
(link works even if you don't have insider)

Players - 29 out of 30
Management - 27 out of 30
Money - 1 out of 30
Market - 1 out of 30
Draft - 10 out of 30

Overall- 24th in league, 12th in the West
https://docs.zoho.com/sheet/ropen.do?rid=bhy44c1d63f96d82e43bdbf492984b6f064dc
_________________
"Every hurt is a lesson, and every lesson makes you better”
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
al242
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Sep 2012
Posts: 3137

PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2016 11:59 pm    Post subject:

kikanga wrote:
ESPN torching us in their future power rankings.

http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/15700437/nba-future-power-rankings-team-ratings-players-management-money-market-draft
(link works even if you don't have insider)

Players - 29 out of 30
Management - 27 out of 30
Money - 1 out of 30
Market - 1 out of 30
Draft - 10 out of 30

Overall- 24th in league, 12th in the West
https://docs.zoho.com/sheet/ropen.do?rid=bhy44c1d63f96d82e43bdbf492984b6f064dc


Nothing to disagree with. Do not get emotional, we are a 17 win team... Dude we freaking suck, really really bad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
BigBallerBrand
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Dec 2008
Posts: 5810
Location: LA

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 12:18 am    Post subject:

Imo with Ingram I think our core is as good as Minnesota. Not sure why they are so high and we are #29
_________________
Billions Billions Billions
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Lakers2015
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 16 Feb 2015
Posts: 2315

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 12:44 am    Post subject:

al242 wrote:
kikanga wrote:
ESPN torching us in their future power rankings.

http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/15700437/nba-future-power-rankings-team-ratings-players-management-money-market-draft
(link works even if you don't have insider)

Players - 29 out of 30
Management - 27 out of 30
Money - 1 out of 30
Market - 1 out of 30
Draft - 10 out of 30

Overall- 24th in league, 12th in the West
https://docs.zoho.com/sheet/ropen.do?rid=bhy44c1d63f96d82e43bdbf492984b6f064dc


Nothing to disagree with. Do not get emotional, we are a 17 win team... Dude we freaking suck, really really bad


Because of Byron and because Kobe was a shell of himself.

Now we have a great, promising young core.

Having us basically last is idiotic, but this is ESPN aka Lakers Hating Network.

We could have prime Shaq and Kobe again and we still wouldn't get respect from those chumps.
_________________
#CowboysNation
#LakeShow
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lewis
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Oct 2013
Posts: 1165

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 1:31 am    Post subject:

These are just a joke:

Management

12. Houston
18. Charlotte
20. Philadelphia
26. Brooklyn
27. L.A. Lakers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakerhaterhater
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 03 May 2016
Posts: 402

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 1:42 am    Post subject:

15 wrote:
Imo with Ingram I think our core is as good as Minnesota. Not sure why they are so high and we are #29


Maybe not quite as good yet...even with Ingram. Minny have 2 players who have a good chance of making All Star next year....we're not quite there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Math
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 22 Mar 2015
Posts: 1550

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 2:27 am    Post subject: Re: Lakers Offseason Outlook

pio2u wrote:
We are at a crossroads but the Lakers are finally trending upward.
Here's a look at possibilities that the off-season may bring.

Offseason Outlook: Los Angeles Lakers

Quote:
The Lakers are coming off a 17-65 season, the worst in their 68-year history. After being one of the league’s elite teams for decades, L.A. has strung together three consecutive last-place finishes. With a fan base and a front office that is used to winning, there is a lot of pressure throughout the organization for an immediate turnaround.


http://www.hoopsrumors.com/2016/05/offseason-outlook-los-angeles-lakers-3.html


In our division; not in our conference and not in the league. By that metric six teams in the league finish last each year.
_________________
I'm a Balliever.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
gumby
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 2500
Location: Inland Empire

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 4:04 am    Post subject:

lewis wrote:
These are just a joke:

Management

12. Houston
18. Charlotte
20. Philadelphia
26. Brooklyn
27. L.A. Lakers


Wow. They are laying it on thick with that particular rating.

At least the Lakers have a positive upside going on with Luke and drafting.
Can't say that for these others.

Brooklyn owes a million draft picks to Boston, that alone was disaster. And they will suck well into the future based on management.

Philly is Philly and they barely have a glimmer of hope with the #1 and no Hinkie. But who really thinks they will do better than last year?

Houston is a Harden away from a complete rebuild. For a team that almost went to the finals a year ago?

Bad, real bad.

Bye.
_________________
"This trophy removes the most odious sentence in the English Language. It can never be said again that 'the Lakers have never beaten the Celtics.'" -Dr. Jerry Buss (1985) R.I.P., 33 x M.V.O.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
governator
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 25098

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 4:12 am    Post subject:

Guess they penalize F.O. for failing to sign star FA in the past 3 years (including Pau and Dwight that left). I for one thought they did what they had to do in getting Dwight and Nash, one last run for Kobe/Pau team. Nobody predicted Nash breaking down, Dwight feeling broken down and Kobe got broken. I mean that was a mountain to get out from (3 starters). Even with the draft picks traded for those players, we still came up with gems and capspace. 27 out of 30 teams, let's see if we'll finally get a break and sign a star FA... or 2
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
al242
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Sep 2012
Posts: 3137

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 4:22 am    Post subject:

Lakers2015 wrote:
al242 wrote:
kikanga wrote:
ESPN torching us in their future power rankings.

http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/15700437/nba-future-power-rankings-team-ratings-players-management-money-market-draft
(link works even if you don't have insider)

Players - 29 out of 30
Management - 27 out of 30
Money - 1 out of 30
Market - 1 out of 30
Draft - 10 out of 30

Overall- 24th in league, 12th in the West
https://docs.zoho.com/sheet/ropen.do?rid=bhy44c1d63f96d82e43bdbf492984b6f064dc


Nothing to disagree with. Do not get emotional, we are a 17 win team... Dude we freaking suck, really really bad


Because of Byron and because Kobe was a shell of himself.

Now we have a great, promising young core.

Having us basically last is idiotic, but this is ESPN aka Lakers Hating Network.

We could have prime Shaq and Kobe again and we still wouldn't get respect from those chumps.


We have nothing but hopes and desire. Im not going to peg our core up a level for something they have yet to show on a consistent basis, as of right now its all potential. Heck they consistently sucked last year as we were a 17 win team, I think its so funny that people always see ESPN as haters. They were considered haters last year too when they projected us to be the 2nd worst team in the west, we were actually the last.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
al242
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Sep 2012
Posts: 3137

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 4:23 am    Post subject:

15 wrote:
Imo with Ingram I think our core is as good as Minnesota. Not sure why they are so high and we are #29


Do you realize we actually do not have Ingram yet?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
governator
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 25098

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 4:25 am    Post subject:

al242 wrote:
Lakers2015 wrote:
al242 wrote:
kikanga wrote:
ESPN torching us in their future power rankings.

http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/15700437/nba-future-power-rankings-team-ratings-players-management-money-market-draft
(link works even if you don't have insider)

Players - 29 out of 30
Management - 27 out of 30
Money - 1 out of 30
Market - 1 out of 30
Draft - 10 out of 30

Overall- 24th in league, 12th in the West
https://docs.zoho.com/sheet/ropen.do?rid=bhy44c1d63f96d82e43bdbf492984b6f064dc


Nothing to disagree with. Do not get emotional, we are a 17 win team... Dude we freaking suck, really really bad


Because of Byron and because Kobe was a shell of himself.

Now we have a great, promising young core.

Having us basically last is idiotic, but this is ESPN aka Lakers Hating Network.

We could have prime Shaq and Kobe again and we still wouldn't get respect from those chumps.


We have nothing but hopes and desire. Im not going to peg our core up a level for something they have yet to show on a consistent basis, as of right now its all potential. Heck they consistently sucked last year as we were a 17 win team, I think its so funny that people always see ESPN as haters. They were considered haters last year too when they projected us to be the 2nd worst team in the west, we were actually the last.


That was actually a masterful tanking job. Very stealthy, hiding behind Kobe's farewell tour, no updated offensive sets, no defensive sets at all
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
al242
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Sep 2012
Posts: 3137

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 4:26 am    Post subject:

gumby wrote:
lewis wrote:
These are just a joke:

Management

12. Houston
18. Charlotte
20. Philadelphia
26. Brooklyn
27. L.A. Lakers


Wow. They are laying it on thick with that particular rating.

At least the Lakers have a positive upside going on with Luke and drafting.
Can't say that for these others.

Brooklyn owes a million draft picks to Boston, that alone was disaster. And they will suck well into the future based on management.

Philly is Philly and they barely have a glimmer of hope with the #1 and no Hinkie. But who really thinks they will do better than last year?

Houston is a Harden away from a complete rebuild. For a team that almost went to the finals a year ago?

Bad, real bad.

Bye.


Drafting? Im sorry have we drafted any players that have turned into allstars...Towns was ROY, Russell was 9th in the ROY race. We are not in Minnesota's class right now. Also Walton has not proved anything yet, he could be a complete bust, I don't like to congratulate management on the unknowns and neither should you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
governator
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 25098

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 4:27 am    Post subject:

al242 wrote:
15 wrote:
Imo with Ingram I think our core is as good as Minnesota. Not sure why they are so high and we are #29


Do you realize we actually do not have Ingram yet?


Ingram, simmons, Randle, Clarkson, Dlo... unfortunately they all way behind Towns in potential or actual current impact
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Chronicle
Retired Number
Retired Number


Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Posts: 31935
Location: Manhattan

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 4:32 am    Post subject:

Well let's be real here. We all know how absolutely terrible Byron was as a coach

How much of an effect it will have on the rookies for the next few years to come cannot be stated. There were reports on Kyrie Irving that it took years to forget the bad habits he picked up under Byron

Our FO did not fire Byron for two whole years. They hired him in the first place

That is ineptitude that warrants a low ranking

ESPN is still (bleep) though. But some people in this thread think we have a great FO. That great FO is the FO that hired and kept Byron for 2 years
_________________
Kobe
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
LVLAKERFAN
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Posts: 5347
Location: United States

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 4:39 am    Post subject:

governator wrote:
al242 wrote:
15 wrote:
Imo with Ingram I think our core is as good as Minnesota. Not sure why they are so high and we are #29


Do you realize we actually do not have Ingram yet?


Ingram, simmons, Randle, Clarkson, Dlo... unfortunately they all way behind Towns in potential or actual current impact


Twolves have Towns, Wiggins, Lavine, Shabazz, Rubio and the #5

We have Russell, Randle, Clarkson, Nance, and the #2

I think they got us beat.
_________________
SCHROEDER/CARUSO/COOK
MATTHEWS/KCP/THT
LEBRON/KUZMA/BABYGIANIS
AD/MORRIS/DUDLEY
GASOL/HARRELL/TINKLE
Coachs:Vogel/Kidd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
al242
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Sep 2012
Posts: 3137

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 4:42 am    Post subject:

Chronicle wrote:
Well let's be real here. We all know how absolutely terrible Byron was as a coach

How much of an effect it will have on the rookies for the next few years to come cannot be stated. There were reports on Kyrie Irving that it took years to forget the bad habits he picked up under Byron

Our FO did not fire Byron for two whole years. They hired him in the first place

That is ineptitude that warrants a low ranking

ESPN is still (bleep) though. But some people in this thread think we have a great FO. That great FO is the FO that hired and kept Byron for 2 years


I consider us to have the 2nd worst front office (this ties to us having the second worst record in the league) until our record reflects otherwise. People like to bash franchises like the Kings, but their inept front office has actually produced a better product than our inept 2.0 front office.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
RI Laker
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 27 Jun 2005
Posts: 7170

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 4:47 am    Post subject:

I would trade our entire core for KAT alone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Denny_Russo
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 27 Jan 2016
Posts: 2710

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 5:31 am    Post subject:

RI Laker wrote:
I would trade our entire core for KAT alone.


Well, thank goodness you aren't a GM.
_________________
Yi Jianlian Fanboy. Respect The Chair.
Starting anew. I'm retiring my main.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
lakerhaterhater
Starting Rotation
Starting Rotation


Joined: 03 May 2016
Posts: 402

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 5:41 am    Post subject:

RI Laker wrote:
I would trade our entire core for KAT alone.


That's a very bad joke
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
nash
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 23 Oct 2001
Posts: 8194

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 5:46 am    Post subject:

RI Laker wrote:
I would trade our entire core for KAT alone.


Not the entire core, but something like Dlo, Randle and Brown in a heart bit.

KAT >>>>>>>>>> Dlo
AW > Randle
LaVine ~ JC but maybe with > upside

They are way ahead in prospects, but we have money and the best city.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
BigGameHames
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 24 May 2015
Posts: 7982

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 5:49 am    Post subject:

al242 wrote:
gumby wrote:
lewis wrote:
These are just a joke:

Management

12. Houston
18. Charlotte
20. Philadelphia
26. Brooklyn
27. L.A. Lakers


Wow. They are laying it on thick with that particular rating.

At least the Lakers have a positive upside going on with Luke and drafting.
Can't say that for these others.

Brooklyn owes a million draft picks to Boston, that alone was disaster. And they will suck well into the future based on management.

Philly is Philly and they barely have a glimmer of hope with the #1 and no Hinkie. But who really thinks they will do better than last year?

Houston is a Harden away from a complete rebuild. For a team that almost went to the finals a year ago?

Bad, real bad.

Bye.


Drafting? Im sorry have we drafted any players that have turned into allstars...Towns was ROY, Russell was 9th in the ROY race. We are not in Minnesota's class right now. Also Walton has not proved anything yet, he could be a complete bust, I don't like to congratulate management on the unknowns and neither should you.


Russell showed a lot of potential and will be an all star eventually IMO even though he isn't there yet (neither is any other rookie). Nance looks to be a great pick in the late first. Clarkson was first team all rookie as a second rounder and Randke averaged a double double his rookie year and also has all star potential although I have less faith in him then Russell. We have drafted very well recently.

Yes Walton may be a complete bust but he was one of the top two coaches on the market this offseason so I think that deserves some credit. We have been terrible recently but are trending upwards. I think the FO deserves some credit for that. Good drafting and a great coaching hire is commendable even though they got us in the situation in the first place.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
KindCrippler2000
Franchise Player
Franchise Player


Joined: 02 May 2003
Posts: 15821

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 5:54 am    Post subject:

Kobe didn't win ROY. Must be a bust.

Time to trade Russell for Michael Carter-Williams.

Do it Mitch!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
al242
Star Player
Star Player


Joined: 28 Sep 2012
Posts: 3137

PostPosted: Mon May 30, 2016 5:56 am    Post subject:

BigGameHames wrote:
al242 wrote:
gumby wrote:
lewis wrote:
These are just a joke:

Management

12. Houston
18. Charlotte
20. Philadelphia
26. Brooklyn
27. L.A. Lakers


Wow. They are laying it on thick with that particular rating.

At least the Lakers have a positive upside going on with Luke and drafting.
Can't say that for these others.

Brooklyn owes a million draft picks to Boston, that alone was disaster. And they will suck well into the future based on management.

Philly is Philly and they barely have a glimmer of hope with the #1 and no Hinkie. But who really thinks they will do better than last year?

Houston is a Harden away from a complete rebuild. For a team that almost went to the finals a year ago?

Bad, real bad.

Bye.


Drafting? Im sorry have we drafted any players that have turned into allstars...Towns was ROY, Russell was 9th in the ROY race. We are not in Minnesota's class right now. Also Walton has not proved anything yet, he could be a complete bust, I don't like to congratulate management on the unknowns and neither should you.


Russell showed a lot of potential and will be an all star eventually IMO even though he isn't there yet (neither is any other rookie). Nance looks to be a great pick in the late first. Clarkson was first team all rookie as a second rounder and Randke averaged a double double his rookie year and also has all star potential although I have less faith in him then Russell. We have drafted very well recently.

Yes Walton may be a complete bust but he was one of the top two coaches on the market this offseason so I think that deserves some credit. We have been terrible recently but are trending upwards. I think the FO deserves some credit for that. Good drafting and a great coaching hire is commendable even though they got us in the situation in the first place.


How have we trended upwards? I expect us to suck next year, I am not placing any more optimism in our incompetent front office to get anything done. Not setting myself up for disappointment is my outlook for 2016-2017, also the 8 other rookies ahead of Russell in the ROY voting also showed promise, so the odds of him becoming an allstar on that narrative alone seem slim.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Reply with quote
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic    LakersGround.net Forum Index -> LA Lakers Lounge All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum






Graphics by uberzev
© 1995-2018 LakersGround.net. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use.
LakersGround is an unofficial news source serving the fan community since 1995.
We are in no way associated with the Los Angeles Lakers or the National Basketball Association.


Powered by phpBB